How would constant acceleration affect a Hohmann Transfer Orbit?

  • Thread starter Sojourner01
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Orbits
In summary, the conversation discusses the calculation of time needed to reach aphelion for a spacecraft with a small constant acceleration due to a thruster burn, specifically an ion engine. The expert explains that Hohmann Transfers do not have constant velocity and that the total energy of the spacecraft remains constant as it gains potential gravitational energy while losing velocity. They also mention that for ion thrusters, the equations become more complicated and can be calculated using software packages such as Satellite Toolkit. The conversation ends with the individual considering whether to abandon their idea or use software to calculate a possible value.
  • #1
Sojourner01
373
0
OK, I'm doing an assignment on spaceflight and I'm looking for a more complicated answer to a Hohmann Transfer. I know the conventional one, but that assumes the spacecraft has a constant velocity through the majority of the orbit.

What if it doesn't? How would one calculate the time needed to reach aphelion if the craft has a small constant acceleration due to a thruster burn (say, an ion engine)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think you've confused yourself a little bit.

Hohmann Transfers do not have constant velocity during the transfer. As the object goes outward from the gravitating body, it loses velocity, just the same as you lose upwards velocity when you jump.

What remains constant is the total Energy. The spacecraft loses velocity (which can also be counted as Kinetic Energy), but it gains Potential Gravitational Energy. The two different types of energy flip back and forth as the satellite proceeds on its orbit, but the sum of the two remains constant.

Doing a thruster burn changes the energy of the system, because it converts chemical or electrical potential energy into Kinetic. Unless the orbit is circular, there is no time that the velocity needs to stay constant.

For ion thrusters and other similar types of propulsion, the equations become much more complicated. To give you an idea, in my space propulsions class which is a 4th year class in an aerospace engineering major they only said _how_ it's done... we didn't have to actually do it.

Basically, you know the starting position and velocity of the spacecraft , and you consider the thrust, mass, direction of burn, etc. If you take a small enough time step, you then can know where the spacecraft is at the initital time + the time step.

The basic procedure is nothing more than Euler's Method for numerical solutions.

When you couple this with a multivariable controller, you can get a grip on the maximum error you can expect to see over long durations. If that error is less than the mission envelope says it can be (for example you want the spacecraft to arrive at a planet at a certain time + or - 2 minutes) the spacecraft can get where it's going.

There are several software packages which are used to do calculations like this. One of them is http://www.stk.com/ or Satellite Toolkit.

Hope that helps. Welcome to PF!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
Heh, thanks.

I knew that about ordinary Hohmann orbits, I just got the wording wrong. I was thinking constant linear acceleration i.e. zero.

The thing about ion engines is that they can make a continuous burn all the way from here to the Kuiper belt (where this is going). Obviously this will be complicated; not in terms of physical principles but definitely difficult to solve. I may either abandon the 'boosted Hohmann' idea entirely, or take your advice and use said software to calculate a possible value.
 

1. What is a Hohmann Transfer Orbit?

A Hohmann Transfer Orbit is a type of orbital maneuver used to transfer a spacecraft from one circular orbit to another by using the gravitational pull of a planet or other celestial body. It involves two burns, one to raise the spacecraft's orbit and another to lower it into the desired orbit.

2. How is a Hohmann Transfer Orbit different from other orbital maneuvers?

Unlike other orbital maneuvers, a Hohmann Transfer Orbit is the most efficient way to transfer a spacecraft between two circular orbits with the least amount of fuel. It takes advantage of the gravitational pull of a planet or other celestial body to reduce the amount of energy needed for the transfer.

3. How long does a Hohmann Transfer Orbit take?

The duration of a Hohmann Transfer Orbit depends on the distance between the two orbits and the speed of the spacecraft. On average, it can take anywhere from a few months to a few years to complete the transfer.

4. What are the advantages of using a Hohmann Transfer Orbit?

One of the main advantages of using a Hohmann Transfer Orbit is that it requires less fuel compared to other orbital maneuvers. This makes it a cost-effective option for transferring spacecraft between orbits. Additionally, it is a relatively simple and predictable maneuver, making it easier to plan and execute.

5. Are there any limitations to using a Hohmann Transfer Orbit?

While a Hohmann Transfer Orbit is an efficient and cost-effective option for transferring spacecraft between orbits, it does have some limitations. It is only suitable for transferring between circular orbits and is not as effective for transferring to highly elliptical or inclined orbits. It also requires precise timing and calculations to ensure a successful transfer.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
6K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Mechanics
Replies
4
Views
830
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
45
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top