Factors affecting signal strength.

In summary, you can measure the signal strength of a transmitting antenna by using a field intensity meter.
  • #1
canada
2
0
I have investigation on measuring the factors the signal strength from the transmitting antenna. I have some idea about measuring the signal strength.
Is it true to use field intensity meter to measure signal strength with the unit of volts per metre? Thank you for helping out.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yes, that is correct. Another common unit of measure for field strength is dBuV/m, when you get farther away from the transmitting antenna, and the field strength is getting weaker.
 
  • #3
Well the technical UNIT is V/m, but
what you'll actually MEASURE at the
output of a receiving antenna is
either volts, amps, or power.

The predetermined geometry and sensitivity specification of the
calibrated receiving antenna is then
related to its measured output signal
and thus one can obtain a V/m value.
 
  • #4
well, what are the factors that affect the signal strength in the transmitting antenna?

field intensity meter will measure in terms of V/m, right? Thank you so much.
 
  • #5
"field intensity meter will measure in terms of V/m, right? Thank you so much."

Yes, if it's a field strength meter, overall the instrument
will be able to give you a V/m reading through whatever
process of use its manual specifies.

"well, what are the factors that affect the signal strength in the transmitting antenna?"

Transmitting antennas have a radiation efficiency factor
that determines how efficiently they radiate. But that's
mostly relevant from the perspective of the transmitter.

Energy that the transmitting antenna does NOT radiate
into the far field is irrelevant to the question of the
field strength a given transmitting antenna does produce
at a given distant location.

It's most appropriate to measure the field strength of
a transmitting antenna at a distance that is at LEAST
several wavelengths away from the antenna, and at
least several times the geometric size of the antenna
away. This is what's known as the "far field" measurement
which indicates the field strength the transmitting antenna
produces at a distant location, and this is representative
of the propagating wave that is produced by the antenna.

If you measured the field strength too close to a
transmitting antenna you would get larger or smaller
than expected values due to the effect of "near field"
non-radiating or non-efficiently radiating radiation
components from the antenna. E.g. even a simple
LC circuit produces E and M fields NEAR itself, and hence
a field strength, but it is almost useless as an antenna
since almost no energy is radiated to distant locations,
it is all remaining concentrated very close to the
circuit / antenna.

So the effects that relate to a far field signal strength
measurement produced by a transmitting antenna are:

a) Geometric field pattern of the antenna in the direction(s)
that cause signal to be receivable at the measurement
location. The higher the geometric gain of the antenna
in directions that influence the receiving location, the
greater the received signal could be there.

b) Power being radiated by the transmitting antenna;
the more power being transmitted, the greater the
remote signal strength.

d) Obstruction loss between the transmitter and receiver;
i.e. is there an ocean or mountain in the path of the signal
that absorbs / reflects a given amount of it? Are there
obstructions like trees, buildings, etc. These will all cause
path loss.

c) Propagation absorbtion loss between the transmitter
and receiver; is some of the signal absorbed in the air,
the ionosphere, by the ground, by foliage, by
rain/clouds/snow, et. al.

d) Propagation path distance between the transmitter
and receiver; depending on the path of signal progagation
there will be some loss due to the geometric diffusion of
signal energy and hence field strength over that distance.

e) Multi-path or diffractive signal diminishment at the
receiving location. It's possible for signals to arrive at
the receiver from several different paths or reflections.
In the case of multiple signal paths the signal may not
'add up' in phase at the receiver and hence the overall
signal strength may become erratic or weaker at the
receiver, or in some cases it could be enhanced.
Obstacles that diffract the transmited wave between
the tx and rx will cause a diffraction pattern at the
receiver location and that interference/diffraction will
affect the signal.
 
  • #6
how can i measure the factors that affects the signal strength from the transmitting antenna?
how should i start on the investigation? thank you.
 
  • #7
malaysia said:
how can i measure the factors that affects the signal strength from the transmitting antenna?
how should i start on the investigation? thank you.

What have you learned by reading this old thread? Surely it must have given you some ideas on how to proceed?
 

1. What are the main factors that affect signal strength?

There are several factors that can affect signal strength, including distance from the source, physical barriers such as walls or buildings, interference from other electronic devices, and weather conditions.

2. How does distance from the source impact signal strength?

The further you are from the source of the signal, the weaker it will be. This is because the signal must travel a longer distance, which can cause it to lose strength.

3. Can physical barriers affect signal strength?

Yes, physical barriers such as walls, buildings, or even trees can block or weaken a signal. This is because the signal must pass through these objects, which can cause interference or attenuation.

4. What types of electronic devices can interfere with signal strength?

Devices that emit their own radio waves, such as microwaves, baby monitors, or cell phones, can interfere with signal strength. This is known as electromagnetic interference (EMI) and can cause signal degradation.

5. How do weather conditions affect signal strength?

Weather conditions such as rain, snow, or fog can also weaken a signal. This is because these conditions can absorb or scatter radio waves, making it more difficult for the signal to reach its destination.

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
3K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top