- #1
MedLine
- 7
- 0
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/25/science/space/25aurora.html?hp"
This is pretty suprising to me and I don't quite understand how the sequence could play out in this way. Regardless, it is a pretty interesting piece.
Medline
The snapping of magnetic fields occurred first, followed by a burst of auroras. Surprisingly, the disruption in the charged particle current occurred after the aurora. Proponents of that hypothesis had thought that the magnetic snapping caused the change in electric current and that, in turn, led to the auroras.
This is pretty suprising to me and I don't quite understand how the sequence could play out in this way. Regardless, it is a pretty interesting piece.
Medline
Last edited by a moderator: