The Latest in Fusion Reactor Research: Breakthroughs & Challenges

In summary, the research into controlled thermonuclear fusion is ongoing, but there are many obstacles to overcome. There is some hope that the first prototypes of a fusion reactor may be ready by 2010.
  • #1
shingetsunohimitsu
7
0
How far is research really gone? Is there any major breakthrough on its way? Are the first prototypes ready yet?

I'm making a project work on this for school, and I find it hard to find sufficient information in books and likes about this, since clearly, books from the beginning of the last decade are going to be very out-of-date today...


I gathered from the Cold Fusion thread, that Cold Fusion is not even an option as it's not do-able?

What are the major obstacles with a fusion reactor as of today? And are there any realistic plans to overcome these obstacles? How far is the research gone in the USA (this is also hard for me to find out since I'm situated in Sweden and mostly can gather info about the JET project)...

ITER is a cooperative effort between Japan, USA and Europe, am I right?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
shingetsunohimitsu said:
How far is research really gone? Is there any major breakthrough on its way? Are the first prototypes ready yet?

I'm making a project work on this for school, and I find it hard to find sufficient information in books and likes about this, since clearly, books from the beginning of the last decade are going to be very out-of-date today...


I gathered from the Cold Fusion thread, that Cold Fusion is not even an option as it's not do-able?

What are the major obstacles with a fusion reactor as of today? And are there any realistic plans to overcome these obstacles? How far is the research gone in the USA (this is also hard for me to find out since I'm situated in Sweden and mostly can gather info about the JET project)...

ITER is a cooperative effort between Japan, USA and Europe, am I right?

shingetsunohimitsu,

First Cold Fusion was a fraud - a couple chemists went public with some
work they didn't understand - and the physics community agrees that
cold fusion never did exist.

Controlled thermonuclear fusion is incredibily difficult - research has
been underway for decades. There are two main approaches - magnetic
confinement and inertial confinement.

Magnetic confinement is the attempt to contain the reaction a magnetic
"bottle". Tokamaks are the leading type of magnetic fusion machine.
That said, the USA has not built a tokamak in years. The leading machine
was the TFTR - Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor at Princeton University's
Plasma Physics Center.

The ITER would follow the work of TFTR - but it has been under discussion
for over a decade - and nothing has actually been built.

In the are of inertial confinemet fusion - i.e. "laser fusion" research is
continuing at the Omega Laser at the University of Rochester. The NIF -
the National Ignition Facility at Lawrence Livermore is in the process
of bringing up the lasers. The physical facility has been built - and will
eventually have 192 laser chains. About 8 laser chains are now operating:

http://www.llnl.gov/nif/project/index.html

http://www.llnl.gov/nif/project/lib_construction.html

http://www.llnl.gov/nif/project/lib_highlights.html

The NIF will be the first machine to achieve "ignition" - that is to
generate as much energy from fusion as was put into the fusion fuel.

However, that's a long, long way from generating large amounts of
power.

Dr. Gregory Greenman
Physicist LLNL
 
  • #3
shingetsunohimitsu said:
How far is research really gone? Is there any major breakthrough on its way? Are the first prototypes ready yet?

ITER is a cooperative effort between Japan, USA and Europe, am I right?

If you view ITERs website http://www.iter.org, somewhere on there is a timeline. I believe that they are expecting their experimental reactor to come online somewhere around 2010 so that commerically viable plants can be built later on.

The United States dropped out of ITER for a while (political reasons) and rejoined last year along with China and Korea.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
There are non-mainstream reactor designs. For example fusors (http://www.fusor.net/) which are not likely to ever produce net energy and sonoluminescent reactors (sorry, no link).
 
  • #5
shingetsunohimitsu said:
What are the major obstacles with a fusion reactor as of today?

I recently had the opportunity to visit Omega. The first major obstacle is to maintain the large temperature that is needed to make a reaction. With inertial confinement, it lasts for nanoseconds (a short laser pulse). A bit more (milliseconds?) is achieved with tokamaks. NIF will do an important step by reaching a break-even point.

It is important to note that these systems are also used by astrophysicists to simulate star core physics, they are not just pre-pre-... - reactor prototypes.
 
  • #6
I suppose the ITER project is lagging a bit due to the member countries bickering about the location of the next stage experimental reactor, which I think ought to be a major improvement over the previous ones and pave the way for "commercial" ones (with any luck).
 
  • #7
Fusion is too dangerous and has been killed. If you have a good fusion system you are able to transmute to produce any end product you wish. As you can guess that can be very dangerous.

The best fusion results to date have been the predecessor of the proposed X-1 project

http://www.sandia.gov/media/Z.htm

This has dropped of the scope and I don’t think you will find anymore about results.
 
  • #8
4Newton said:
Fusion is too dangerous and has been killed. If you have a good fusion system you are able to transmute to produce any end product you wish. As you can guess that can be very dangerous.

Who said this and when? And what about fusion of iron and heavier atoms which are endothermic fusion reactions? In theory those elemnts could be fused but how would any man made machine be able to produce that much energy if even stars implode when fusing iron?
 
  • #9
The only practical fusion reactors are those converting isotopes of hydrogen to helium. Anything else would involve much higher temperatures and pressures and would be impossible today on any useful scale.
 
  • #10
Exactly, mathman. Being able to produce any end product you could want would require being able to do H to He and get net energy from it, to continue fusion. Producing Plutonium or Uranium from just Hydrogen would still be a long ways off even if we could.
 
  • #11
theCandyman said:
Exactly, mathman. Being able to produce any end product you could want would require being able to do H to He and get net energy from it, to continue fusion. Producing Plutonium or Uranium from just Hydrogen would still be a long ways off even if we could.

Candyman,

Exactly - producing Plutonium and Uranium is best left to supernovae.

You get the minimum binding energy per nucleon with Iron.

If you fuse elements lighter than Iron - you get energy.

If you fission elements heavier than Iron - you get energy.

Dr. Gregory Greenman
Physicist
 
  • #12
I'm hedging my bets on saltwater. Hot fusion seems to be our only road forward. I'm still undecided as to whether I should study magnetic confinement or inertial/laser systems though. My gut says "magnetics", but laser-type systems have become more viable. Is this correct? This is my first year in college, and I do have to choose a suitable university in Ca.
 
  • #13
Savitri, the University of California has very good engineering programs at the San Diego (UCSD), Santa Barbara (UCSB) and LA (UCLA) campuses. And there is also UC Berkeley, which still has a nuclear engineering program.

In addition, General Atomic is located there in San Diego.
 
  • #14
Thanks Astronuc.
 
  • #15
Ok, this thread is a bit old (has been dormant for about a month until yesterday), but if anyone is still interested, goolge for "fusion ignition research experiment", aka FIRE (unforetunately, googling for "fire" gives too many irrelevant results, so you have to use the full name).
 
  • #16
Heard today that the location of ITER might finally be set ... France ... I've been out of the loop for a while, anyone got any other information on this or is this just a scoop ?
 
  • #17
What happens if you replace the NIF lasers with say electrons with the proper energy to create x-rays in a closed high-Z chamber?
 

What is fusion energy and why is it important?

Fusion energy is a potential source of clean and sustainable energy that is produced by fusing two lighter atomic nuclei together to form a heavier nucleus. This process releases a large amount of energy, similar to what is produced by the sun. It is important because it has the potential to provide a nearly limitless source of energy without producing harmful greenhouse gases or radioactive waste.

What are the latest breakthroughs in fusion reactor research?

Some of the latest breakthroughs in fusion reactor research include the development of advanced superconducting magnets, improvements in plasma confinement and stability, and the use of new materials for the reactor walls that can withstand the extreme conditions of fusion reactions.

What are the main challenges in developing a fusion reactor?

The main challenges in developing a fusion reactor include achieving and maintaining the necessary temperatures and pressures for fusion to occur, finding materials that can withstand the extreme conditions inside the reactor, and managing the plasma within the reactor to prevent disruptions and maintain stability.

How close are we to achieving sustainable fusion energy?

While there has been significant progress in fusion research, achieving sustainable fusion energy is still a significant challenge. Many experts believe that we are still several decades away from commercial fusion energy, but some smaller fusion reactors have already achieved positive net energy production.

What is the potential impact of fusion energy on the future of energy production?

If we are able to successfully develop fusion energy, it could have a significant impact on the future of energy production. It has the potential to provide a nearly limitless source of clean and sustainable energy, which could help reduce our reliance on fossil fuels and mitigate the effects of climate change.

Similar threads

  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
970
Replies
2
Views
863
  • General Discussion
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
4
Views
6K
Back
Top