Register to reply

Scattering field formulation used in DG-FEM

by discworld
Tags: dgfem, field, formulation, scattering
Share this thread:
Apr29-13, 05:35 AM
P: 1

Reading up on simulations of electromagnetic scattering with DG-FEM and trying some myself, I got stuck.
In some of papers I have read, a scattering field formulation is used, in which the total field is linearly decomposed in incident field and scattering field:

[itex] E^{T}=E^{S}+E^{I}[/itex]

And, the 2D equations for the scattering field in a lossless, isotropic medium are:

[itex] \epsilon_{r} \frac{\partial E^{S}}{\partial t} = \nabla \times H^{S} - (\epsilon_{r} - \epsilon_{r}^{I}) \frac{\partial E^{i}}{\partial t} [/itex]
[itex] \mu_{r} \frac{\partial H^{S}}{\partial t} = -\nabla \times E^{S} - (\mu_{r} - \mu_{r}^{I}) \frac{\partial H^{i}}{\partial t} [/itex]

My problem is in the interpretation of the "scattering field" and "incident field" in this context. In every use I see of this formulation [itex]\epsilon_{r}[/itex] is space dependent, while [itex]\epsilon_{r}^{I}[/itex] is a constant - specifically, the incident medium's permittivity (same for the permeability). How can this work for multi-substrate cases, where, if I am thinking correctly, the medium considered incident should change?

(I am quite confused with the affair in general, so any clarifications are quite welcome)
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on
Physicists discuss quantum pigeonhole principle
First in-situ images of void collapse in explosives
The first supercomputer simulations of 'spin?orbit' forces between neutrons and protons in an atomic nucleus

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Hamiltonian formulation of *classical* field theory Classical Physics 7
Magnetic field formulation! Classical Physics 1
Scattering of Waves Formulation (moved to correct forum) Calculus & Beyond Homework 0
Scattering of Waves Formulation Precalculus Mathematics Homework 0
Equivalence between path integral formulation and matrix formulation Quantum Physics 1