- #1
madness
- 815
- 70
Hi everyone,
I'm having trouble getting a mathematical result in the following paper:
http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-88853-6_4#page-1
In particular, I can't figure out how they reach equation 7. They use equations (3) and (5), and I think they discard a lot of the terms in the integral based on the assumption that A decays exponentially or faster. I think they also use the symmetry of the integral to change the limits. Can anyone figure it out?
I'm having trouble getting a mathematical result in the following paper:
http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-88853-6_4#page-1
In particular, I can't figure out how they reach equation 7. They use equations (3) and (5), and I think they discard a lot of the terms in the integral based on the assumption that A decays exponentially or faster. I think they also use the symmetry of the integral to change the limits. Can anyone figure it out?