Are zero divisors in R[x] also zero divisors in R?

  • Thread starter chuy52506
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Rings Zero
In summary, if an element in a commutative ring is a zero divisor in the polynomial ring R[x], then its leading coefficient an will also be a zero divisor in R. This can be proven by considering the product of the zero divisor polynomial p(x) with any other polynomial q(x), which will result in a new polynomial with a leading term of an*bm*x^(n+m). Since this product is equal to 0, it means an*bm*x^(n+m) is also a zero divisor in R.
  • #1
chuy52506
77
0
Let R be a commutative ring. If an doesn't equal 0 and
a0+a1x+a2x^2+...+anx^n is a zero divisor in R[x], prove that an is a zero divisor in R.


What I did was say if the polynomial is a zero divisor in R[x] then let that polynomial equal p(x) and any other polynomial be q(x) with coefficients b0,b1,...,bm, then p(x)*q(x)=0. And the leading coefficient and degree will be an*bm*x^(n+m) which will be a zero divisor in R. Therefore an will be a zero divisor. However I don't know what to say to show this? is it correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
This is a mostly correct argument: you have the right basic idea, but a couple of points come across as nonsense or misstated. You say "let [tex]p[/tex] be a zero divisor and [tex]q[/tex] be any other polynomial, then [tex]pq = 0[/tex]". This is false. What it means for [tex]p[/tex] to be a zero divisor is that there exists a polynomial [tex]q[/tex] such that [tex]pq = 0[/tex]. Also, it doesn't make sense to say "[tex]a_n b_m x^{n+m}[/tex] is a zero divisor in [tex]R[/tex]", as this is a monomial that lives in [tex]R[x][/tex], not in [tex]R[/tex].

Other than that, your argument just needs text editing. Try correcting these points, and then one of us can show you how to clean up the wording.
 

1. What are zero divisors in a ring and how do they affect the ring's properties?

Zero divisors are elements in a ring that, when multiplied by another element, result in zero. They affect the ring's properties by making it a non-integral domain, meaning that there exist non-zero elements whose product is zero. This can lead to the loss of certain properties, such as the ability to cancel out common factors.

2. Can a ring have more than one zero divisor?

Yes, a ring can have multiple zero divisors. In fact, all non-zero elements in a ring can be zero divisors if the ring is not an integral domain.

3. How are zero divisors related to the commutativity of a ring?

In a commutative ring, the order of multiplication does not matter. Therefore, if an element is a zero divisor when multiplied on the left, it will also be a zero divisor when multiplied on the right. However, in a non-commutative ring, an element can be a zero divisor when multiplied on one side, but not on the other.

4. Are there any real-life applications of zero divisors and rings?

Yes, zero divisors and rings have many applications in fields such as abstract algebra, number theory, and cryptography. They are also used in the study of polynomial rings and algebraic geometry.

5. Can a ring have zero divisors but still be a field?

No, a field is a type of ring that has the additional property of every non-zero element having a multiplicative inverse. Since zero divisors cannot have a multiplicative inverse, a ring with zero divisors cannot be a field.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
24
Views
792
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
2
Replies
55
Views
4K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
704
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top