Unambiguous Quantum Gravity Phenomenology: Bonder & Sudarsky

In summary, the authors present a refined proposal for exploring quantum gravity phenomenology, which is free from sign ambiguities and focuses on effects arising from a fundamental granularity of quantum space-time. This proposal is fully observer covariant and involves non-trivial couplings of curvature to matter fields, with a well-defined phenomenology. The authors also present an effective Hamiltonian for potential experimental analysis and discuss its compatibility with the equivalence principle. However, the idea of granular space lacks observational support and its potential crystal-like structure is uncertain.
  • #1
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
4,446
558
arXiv:0811.1229 (cross-list from gr-qc) [ps, pdf, other]
Title: Unambiguous Quantum Gravity Phenomenology Respecting Lorentz Symmetry
Authors: Yuri Bonder, Daniel Sudarsky
Comments: Based on a talk given at the 40th SMP: Geometry and Quanta
Subjects: General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc); High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph)
We describe a refined version of a previous proposal for the exploration of quantum gravity phenomenology. Unlike the original scheme, the one presented here is free from sign ambiguities while it shares with the previous one the essential features. It focuses on effects that could be thought as arising from a fundamental granularity of quantum space-time. The sort of schemes we consider are in sharp contrast with the simplest scenarios in that such granularity is assumed to respect Lorentz Invariance but it remains otherwise unspecified. The proposal is fully observer covariant, it involves non-trivial couplings of curvature to matter fields and leads to a well defined phenomenology. We present the effective Hamiltonian which could be used to analyze concrete experimental situations, and we shortly review the degree to which this proposal is in line with the fundamental ideas behind the equivalence principle.

Way over my head, but i thought it might be interesting.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Granular space is an appealing idea, but lacks observational support. It should fuzzy up [diffract] the images of exceedingly distant objects.
 
  • #3
does that assume that the 'granules' form a regular crystal-like pattern? what if its more like an amorphous substance?
 

1. What is "Unambiguous Quantum Gravity Phenomenology"?

"Unambiguous Quantum Gravity Phenomenology" is a theoretical framework developed by physicists Bonder and Sudarsky. It aims to reconcile the theories of quantum mechanics and general relativity, which are currently incompatible, in order to better understand the fundamental workings of the universe.

2. How does "Unambiguous Quantum Gravity Phenomenology" differ from other theories of quantum gravity?

Unlike other theories of quantum gravity, which often involve complex mathematical models and rely on speculative assumptions, "Unambiguous Quantum Gravity Phenomenology" is based on a more empirical approach. It focuses on observable phenomena that can be tested and verified, making it a more reliable and scientifically rigorous framework.

3. What are the potential implications of "Unambiguous Quantum Gravity Phenomenology"?

If successful, "Unambiguous Quantum Gravity Phenomenology" could provide a more complete understanding of the fundamental laws of nature, potentially leading to breakthroughs in fields such as cosmology, particle physics, and quantum computing. It could also help resolve long-standing paradoxes and inconsistencies in our current understanding of the universe.

4. How is "Unambiguous Quantum Gravity Phenomenology" being tested and validated?

Currently, there are ongoing experiments and observations being conducted to test the predictions of "Unambiguous Quantum Gravity Phenomenology". These include experiments at particle accelerators, observations of gravitational waves, and studies of the cosmic microwave background radiation. Additionally, the framework is constantly being refined and expanded upon through collaboration among physicists and researchers.

5. Is "Unambiguous Quantum Gravity Phenomenology" widely accepted in the scientific community?

While still a relatively new and evolving framework, "Unambiguous Quantum Gravity Phenomenology" has gained support and interest from many prominent physicists and researchers. However, there is still ongoing debate and criticism within the scientific community, as with any emerging theory. Further research and experimentation will be necessary to fully evaluate its validity.

Similar threads

I Rovelli on Quantum Gravity
    • Beyond the Standard Models
4
Replies
105
Views
10K
I Graviweak Unification and Coleman-Mandula theorem
    • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
7
Views
2K
I Is the Continuum Limit of Spin Foam Dynamics Equivalent to Massless Gravitons?
    • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
I MOND as a purely quantum gravity effect
    • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Implications of validating loop quantum cosmology
    • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
28
Views
4K
I Testing Quantum Gravity paper Bose Einstein helium superfluid
    • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
8
Views
2K
A MOND Theory Primer: Stacy McGaugh's Research Program Explored
    • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
11
Views
2K
I Testing string/m-theory extra dimensions prediction
    • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
10
Views
2K
I Can Core Theory Be Derived From Nine Lines?
    • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
6
Views
2K
I Asymptotic safety and loop quantum gravity
    • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top