Exploring Cold Welding: Understanding Friction and Surface Roughness

In summary: I'm trying to understand why, when two surfaces attempt to slide across one another, a force resists that movement. It seems intuitive that the nature of friction can be best understood by considering the interaction between the two surfaces at a microscopic level. My physics textbook seems to say that frictional forces result from the difficulty of breaking the bonds between two surfaces that form as a result of cold welding. I realize that, if correct, this cold welding would normally be on a much lesser scale than that which occurs when two surfaces come into contact with one another in the "everyday world." However, I'm curious as to why this is the case, and if it is actually the case. Does anyone have any insight into this?
  • #1
Zorodius
184
0
If I'm understanding it correctly, my book says that frictional forces are the result of cold welds - that when two surfaces are in contact with one another, the highest points on the surfaces on an atomic scale weld together to form a single object, and these welds are what resists movement when some object tries to slide over some other object.

This seems intuitive, but it raises a question in my mind: Usually, I would think of a rougher surface as one with greater friction, and a smoother surface as one that is easier to slide across. By my book's explanation, a smoother surface has the opportunity for more atom-to-atom contact, and therefore more points of cold-welding, leading to greater friction.

Why the discrepancy? Is it because I'm thinking of "rough" and "smooth" on entirely the wrong scale, or is it something else?

And, on a mildly related note, does this mean that any time friction opposes the movement of two surfaces across one another, some atoms of each surface are ripped off and stuck to the other surface?

Thanks for taking the time to answer my neophyte questions. :wink:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
To the first (I'm on thin ice here..):
I would think that a macroscopically "rough" surfaces is microscopically characterized by lots of "protuberances" (spikes)
These protuberances can more easily slide into the other material, and hence come in close contact with more molecules (more difficult to dislodge).

Secondly, I would think that occasionally, such spikes will break off..
 
  • #3
I work in a wafer fab clean room, a few weeks ago 2 200mm raw wafers were mis handled by our tool and ended up in full surface contact, these raw Silicone faces which are extremely flat and highly polished were impossible to separate. There was no glue other then a bit of moisture, no applied pressure other then atmospheric. Yet is was as if the wafers were glued together. Any time the unprocessed face of Si wafers come in contact it is very difficult or impossible to separate them, this is an example of high surface contact friction. You simply do not encounter this phenomena in the everyday world. Most surfaces are neither smooth nor flat enough for this type of bonding to occur.
 
  • #4
Integral said:
You simply do not encounter this phenomena in the everyday world. Most surfaces are neither smooth nor flat enough for this type of bonding to occur.
So is it correct or incorrect to say that all friction is the result of cold welding, but that there are usually several orders of magnitude less cold welding occurring between regular surfaces than occurred with your silicone wafers?
 
  • #5
You know, this really angers me. My physics teacher said that frcition had nothign to do with how much of the surface is in contact...I intuitively argued, it woulda been nice to have this stuff.
 
  • #6
KingNothing said:
You know, this really angers me. My physics teacher said that frcition had nothign to do with how much of the surface is in contact...I intuitively argued, it woulda been nice to have this stuff.
I think he was pointing out that by reducing the area of contact between two surfaces, you increase the pressure across that area by the same amount, so the net change is nothing. Therefore, friction between two surfaces does not depend on the surface area, only the magnitude of the normal force and coefficient of friction.
 
  • #7
Zorodius said:
So is it correct or incorrect to say that all friction is the result of cold welding, but that there are usually several orders of magnitude less cold welding occurring between regular surfaces than occurred with your silicone wafers?
I'm still curious about the answer to the above question.
 
  • #8
Zorodius said:
So is it correct or incorrect to say that all friction is the result of cold welding, but that there are usually several orders of magnitude less cold welding occurring between regular surfaces than occurred with your silicone wafers?
The word "all" bothers me I am reluctant to draw that conclusion. I am not sure I understand the last statement, nor am I willing draw an conclusion with such an ill defined statement. Please clarify.
 
  • #9
Integral said:
The word "all" bothers me I am reluctant to draw that conclusion. I am not sure I understand the last statement, nor am I willing draw an conclusion with such an ill defined statement. Please clarify.
I'm trying to understand why, when two surfaces attempt to slide across one another, a force resists that movement. It seems intuitive that the nature of friction can be best understood by considering the interaction between the two surfaces at a microscopic level. My physics textbook seems to say that frictional forces result from the difficulty of breaking the bonds between two surfaces that form as a result of cold welding. I realize that, if correct, this cold welding would normally be on a much lesser scale than that which occurred between your silicone wafers.

What I am looking for is a confirmation or denial that, when two mostly flat surfaces attempt to slide across one another, friction results from the difficulty of breaking the cold welds that form between the atoms of one surface and the atoms of the other.
 
  • #10
Friction is not a result of cold welding alone. Friction between rough surfaces is dominated by another effect. I don't know if this has a name but it can be "roughly" described by an analogy. Consider a road with irregular undulations on it, each of which has a radius of curvature of magnitude a foot. Clearly, it will be harder to drive your car over this road (not just from a passenger comfort point of view) than over a relatively smooth one. And sometimes, if the undulation (or pit) exactly matches the size of one of your wheels (what ? a car with different sized wheels ?!), you might find it easier to get past that pit if you leave that wheel behind. This is the "breaking off" effect that Arildno described. For most normally rough surfaces, I believe the above effects dominate the cold welding action.
 
  • #11
Hi guys. As a mechanical engineering final year student, I was assigned to design and build a cold welding prototype to weld just two sheets of metal together by lap joint. The thing is I have no idea how to design this since I haven't had any experience in building these kind of things. Anyone did similar kind of project? Can you show me examples or samples? Thanks in advance!
 

What is cold welding and how does it differ from traditional welding?

Cold welding is a process where two metal surfaces are joined together at room temperature without the use of heat or filler material. It differs from traditional welding, which uses heat to melt and fuse the metals together.

What causes cold welding to occur?

Cold welding occurs when two metals with clean and flat surfaces are pressed together with sufficient force. This force causes the atoms of the two metals to diffuse and bond together at the atomic level, creating a strong bond between the two surfaces.

What are the advantages of cold welding?

Cold welding offers several advantages over traditional welding, including the ability to join dissimilar metals, the absence of heat-affected zones, and the ability to join delicate or heat-sensitive materials without causing damage.

What are the limitations of cold welding?

Cold welding is limited by the surface conditions of the materials being joined. The surfaces must be clean, flat, and free of oxide layers for the process to be successful. Additionally, cold welding is not suitable for joining large or complex structures, as it requires precise alignment and high pressure.

How is friction related to cold welding?

Friction plays a crucial role in cold welding, as it provides the necessary force to bring the two metal surfaces into contact and create the bond. Friction also helps to remove any surface contaminants, allowing the atoms of the two metals to bond more easily.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
806
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Mechanics
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top