Are Uncontacted Tribes Influenced by External Cultures?

  • Thread starter rootX
  • Start date
In summary: The Piraha language challenges simplistic application of Hockett’s (1960) nearly universally-accepted “design features of human language”, by showing that some of these design features (interchangeability, displacement and productivity) may be culturally constrained. In particular Piraha culture constrains communication to non-abstract subjects which fall within the immediate experience of interlocutors. This constraint explains several very surprising features of Piraha grammar and culture, some of which are listed below:1) The absence of creation myths and fiction2) The simplest kinship system yet documented3) The absence of numbers of any kind or a concept of counting4) The absence of color systems5
  • #1
rootX
479
4
I never of them before :eek:

_44701396_pixone.jpg


Its really surprising that few of them are of black color (or maybe they painted themselves black?) I think black ones are females .

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_pictures/7426869.stm
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Nice picture, it captures a moment of our past.

We must appear as gods to them.
 
  • #3
Now that's an interesting discovery. I especially like the picture of the warriors prepping to shoot arrows at the plane or helicopter.

_44701421_pixw.jpg


It's nice to think that there's still tribes out there that still haven't been influenced by outside culture.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
waht said:
Nice picture, it captures a moment of our past.

We must appear as gods to them.

no no .. we are not gods, majority we are predators :biggrin:
 
  • #6
What the freak is that black noise maker flying above us?...Lets shoot arrows at it!

That's crazy. :bugeye:
 
  • #7
'We do not need to make contact with them. We need to protect them. We need to completely leave them alone, but it sure would be nice to fly over once and a while and study their habits.'

UFOs:uhh:
 
  • #8
waht said:
We must appear as gods to them.

I'm sure we appear to be quite the opposite.
 
  • #9
B. Elliott said:
'We do not need to make contact with them. We need to protect them. We need to completely leave them alone, but it sure would be nice to fly over once and a while and study their habits.'

UFOs:uhh:

Are aliens thinking the same way?
Because of our own good, they just staying away from us.


My Algebra professor compared us to some tribe named Peruhara (I forgot the exact name) who lack abstraction - they are really interesting and dumb people. I don't remember exactly what he said but something like if you are walking in straight line and then take a turn, you would become invisible to them llol
 
  • #10
Wow! That is pretty interesting, thanks for posting :smile:
 
  • #12
Throw empty glass coke bottles at them. Bahahahahaha.
 
  • #13
Cyrus said:
Throw empty glass coke bottles at them. Bahahahahaha.

Magic demon crystals!

*edit* That just reminded me of the tribe that was in Joe vs. the Volcano. lol
 
  • #14
Those two movies have got to be some of my favorites, ever!
 
  • #15
Cyrus said:
Throw empty glass coke bottles at them. Bahahahahaha.

There is a movie like that :smile:

Edit: note to self, read rest of postings. Nevermind
 
  • #16
rootX said:
My Algebra professor compared us to some tribe named Peruhara (I forgot the exact name) who lack abstraction - they are really interesting and dumb people. I don't remember exactly what he said but something like if you are walking in straight line and then take a turn, you would become invisible to them llol
That would be the Piraha. I wrote this back in 2004.

Cultural constraints on cognition?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Marcus, you mentioned an interest in linguistics. I wonder what your neighbor would think about this. I have been interested for some time in tribal cultures in South America and New Guinea. This tribe, the Piraha, is the most unusual I have come across.

I'd like to know what you and others think about this. Does their culture prevent them from learning?

The first is an article giving a brief overview of the tribe. The second (PDF) covers their language and culture.

Rueters

"Members of a tiny, isolated Brazilian tribe have no words for numbers other than "one or a few" or "many" and seem to have trouble counting, the researchers reported.

The Piraha tribespeople are clearly intelligent, so the finding opens questions into how language may affect thinking, the researchers say in this week's issue of the journal Science."

http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsArticle...199 §ion=news <broken>

The Piraha language challenges simplistic application of Hockett’s (1960) nearly universally-accepted “design features of human language”, by showing that some of these design features (interchangeability, displacement and productivity) may be culturally constrained. In particular Piraha culture constrains communication to non-abstract subjects which fall within the immediate experience of interlocutors. This constraint explains several very surprising features of Piraha grammar and culture:

1) The absence of creation myths and fiction
2) The simplest kinship system yet documented
3) The absence of numbers of any kind or a concept of counting
4) The absence of color systems
5) The absence of embedding in the grammar
6) The absence of “relative tenses”
7) The borrowing of its entire pronoun inventory from Tupi
8) The fact that the Piraha are monolingual after more than 200 years of regular contact with Brazilians and the Tupi-Guarani-speaking Kawahiv
9) The absence of any individual or collective memory of more than two generations past
10) The absence of drawing or other art and one of the simplest material cultures yet documented
11) The absence of any terms for quantification, e.g. “all”, “each”, “every”, “most”, “some”, etc…
Since my links are broken, I will just throw this article in for now.

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/04/16/070416fa_fact_colapinto
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #19
Evo said:
That would be the Piraha. I wrote this back in 2004.
Wow, that's crazy. That has some profound implications in it about the nature of human development.
 
  • #20
I don't know much about linguistics, but I had a prof in college who was fascinated by mathematical notation. He believed that the influence of notation on mathematical thought was huge.

After learning Dirac notation, I found it certainly changed the way I thought about quantum mechanics. The notation became a scaffold for my thinking.

So if notation can influence how one thinks of mathematical concepts, I can see how language could influence thought.

But it seems that it would be hard to distinguish the influence of language from the influence of culture.
 
  • #21
lisab said:
I don't know much about linguistics, but I had a prof in college who was fascinated by mathematical notation. He believed that the influence of notation on mathematical thought was huge.

After learning Dirac notation, I found it certainly changed the way I thought about quantum mechanics. The notation became a scaffold for my thinking.

So if notation can influence how one thinks of mathematical concepts, I can see how language could influence thought.

But it seems that it would be hard to distinguish the influence of language from the influence of culture.
I also disagree with the person that stated "language influences thought", in this case, They've been exposed to language from another tribe for over 200 years and it has not changed them. They are satisfied with their simplicity. It seems to work for them.
 
  • #22
The Piraha and Dirac is fascinating. How could George Orwell have known, when he invented http://www.netcharles.com/orwell/articles/col-newspeak.htm :

...Newspeak is closely based on English but has a greatly reduced and simplified vocabulary and grammar. This suited the totalitarian regime of the Party, whose aim was to make subversive thought ("thoughtcrime") and speech impossible...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #23
I've read about isolated tribes (I think in Australia and parts of Polynesia) that as recently as a few decades ago, when they were studied pretty extensively, hadn't yet figured out the connection between sex and conception. That too may be related to design aspects of their languages.
 
  • #24
Has any research gone into the idea that it isn't the language that limits their thinking, but their thinking that limits their language? Why can't a tribe uncontacted by the rest of the world for thousands of years, not have an actually physically different brain by now?
 
  • #25
How can language affect "basic" thinking? If I see a picture of a part of the body that I don't know the name for, but I see where it belongs in the body, what difference does it make if I know the name?

Someone might know that if you eat a certain plant you will get sick or die. You don't need the words for plant, sick or die to put them together in your mind and understand the link between them.

You don't need to have words for fire, hot or burn to understand. language just makes communicating what you know with someone else easier. Of course, you could just demonstrate and neither would need words.
 
Last edited:
  • #26
Evo said:
How can language affect "basic" thinking? If I see a picture of a part of the body that I don't know the name for, but I see where it belongs in the body, what difference does it make if I know the name?

Someone might know that if you eat a certain plant you will get sick or die. You don't need the words for plant, sick or die to put them together in your mind and understand the link between them.

You don't need to have words for fire, hot or burn to understand. language just makes communicating what you know with someone else easier. Of course, you could just demonstrate and neither would need words.

It is argued that the language one learns as a child directly affects the development of the brain... or perhaps I should say cognitive processes.
 
  • #27
On a related note: I recall my German Professor saying that at some age, something around four or five years, maybe a little older... the language known will always be one's native tongue. Any other language learned after that time will always be secondary in one's thinking processes.
 
  • #28
Gokul43201 said:
I've read about isolated tribes (I think in Australia and parts of Polynesia) that as recently as a few decades ago, when they were studied pretty extensively, hadn't yet figured out the connection between sex and conception. That too may be related to design aspects of their languages.

That sounds like rural Wisconsin a few decades ago (like when my parents were young). Well, at least young married couples. Sex was a pretty uncomfortable topic for parents to talk about to their kids. Sometimes the doctor had to be the one to explain where these kids kept coming from.

For the most part, I'd be surprised at a culture where no one knew that. Even your primitive cultures had drugs that lessened the chance of pregnancy or had a good chance of ending a pregnancy. Having more than one child nursing at a time usually wasn't a good thing.
 
Last edited:
  • #29
BobG said:
That sounds like rural Wisconsin a few decades ago (like when my parents were young). Well, at least young married couples. Sex was a pretty uncomfortable topic for parents to talk about to their kids. Sometimes the doctor had to be the one to explain where these kids kept coming from.

For the most part, I'd be surprised at a culture where no one knew that. Even your primitive cultures had drugs that lessened the chance of pregnancy or had a good chance of ending a pregnancy. Having more than one child nursing at a time usually wasn't a good thing.

Nursing usually - though not always - suppresses ovulation.
 
  • #30
Ivan Seeking said:
It is argued that the language one learns as a child directly affects the development of the brain... or perhaps I should say cognitive processes.
I've heard that argument, of course learning a language is a part of learning overall, which would I assume would affect development of the brain, but additional learning can come without language. Nereid had brought this up in one of our discussions that for these tribes an ethnobotanist would be better at determining the level of knowledge that these tribes possesses than an anthropologist.

Trapped in a jungle, would you rather have an illiterate tribesman that knows the thousand important ways to survive or a PHD in English Literature? :tongue2:

Nereid said:
Presumably the Piraha are (or were) quite successful in their environment - do any of the materials mention how long they've been there as a group? It obviously can't be more than ~13,000 years.

Everett is an anthropologist, not an ethnobotanist, so presumably couldn't assess the depth and sophistication of the Piraha's knowledge and understanding of the local flora. IIRC, all (most?) hunter-gatherer groups who've been studied by ethnobotanists have shown - to us - astonishingly rich understanding of their local flora. The extent of the Piraha's capabilities might be an easy way to test hitssquad's idea (unless, of course, such rich botanical understanding can be easily acquired by people with low IQ).

Evo, have you come across the Fayu of New Guinea in your reading?
 
Last edited:
  • #31
Evo said:
Trapped in a jungle, would you rather have an illiterate tribesman that knows the thousand important ways to survive or a PHD in English Literature? :tongue2:
That's kind of what I was getting at—if some remote tribe in their history have ever needed to count to more than 20, and only have a word for "more than twenty," why does this mean it's their language's fault? The language evolved to their needs, not the other way around. Even if they are born equal, when their young brains are plastic and ready to learn, they are never introduced to concepts that don't exist there. Mathematics started because of the need to keep track of large numbers of things, like in economics and trade.
 
  • #33
  • #34
but if 75% die as a result of contact?
as that is the record with these uncontacted tribes
they simply don't have immunity to far too many common diseases
''contaminating other cultures" is not just ideas or morals

too bad we can't just let them be
 
  • #35
Sorry, the serious discussion is fine and asks some good questions but


all I keep thinking about is N!xau and his coke bottle. too funny. :rofl:
 
<h2>1. How do you find uncontacted tribes?</h2><p>Finding uncontacted tribes is a complex process that involves extensive research, aerial surveys, and on-the-ground expeditions. Researchers look for signs of human activity, such as footprints, shelters, or smoke from fires. They also rely on information from local communities and indigenous groups who may have knowledge of nearby uncontacted tribes.</p><h2>2. What are the potential risks of making contact with uncontacted tribes?</h2><p>Making contact with uncontacted tribes can have serious consequences for both the tribe and the researchers. These tribes have no immunity to common diseases and can be easily infected by outsiders. There is also a risk of introducing foreign cultural practices that can disrupt their way of life. Additionally, contact can lead to violent encounters as the tribes may see outsiders as a threat to their territory and resources.</p><h2>3. How do you ensure the safety and well-being of uncontacted tribes during the research process?</h2><p>The safety and well-being of uncontacted tribes are always the top priority in any research involving them. Researchers work closely with local governments and indigenous organizations to develop protocols and guidelines for approaching and interacting with these tribes. This includes obtaining permission from the tribe and minimizing contact to prevent the spread of diseases.</p><h2>4. What have you learned about uncontacted tribes through your research?</h2><p>Through our research, we have learned that uncontacted tribes are incredibly resilient and have developed unique ways of surviving in their environments. They also have complex social structures and cultural practices that have remained unchanged for thousands of years. Our research has also shed light on the importance of preserving these tribes and their ways of life for future generations.</p><h2>5. What are the ethical considerations when studying uncontacted tribes?</h2><p>Studying uncontacted tribes raises ethical concerns, as these tribes have chosen to remain isolated from the outside world. Researchers must always prioritize the safety and well-being of the tribes and respect their right to self-determination. This includes obtaining informed consent and ensuring that their research does not harm or exploit the tribes in any way. Researchers must also consider the potential impact of their findings on the tribe and their culture.</p>

1. How do you find uncontacted tribes?

Finding uncontacted tribes is a complex process that involves extensive research, aerial surveys, and on-the-ground expeditions. Researchers look for signs of human activity, such as footprints, shelters, or smoke from fires. They also rely on information from local communities and indigenous groups who may have knowledge of nearby uncontacted tribes.

2. What are the potential risks of making contact with uncontacted tribes?

Making contact with uncontacted tribes can have serious consequences for both the tribe and the researchers. These tribes have no immunity to common diseases and can be easily infected by outsiders. There is also a risk of introducing foreign cultural practices that can disrupt their way of life. Additionally, contact can lead to violent encounters as the tribes may see outsiders as a threat to their territory and resources.

3. How do you ensure the safety and well-being of uncontacted tribes during the research process?

The safety and well-being of uncontacted tribes are always the top priority in any research involving them. Researchers work closely with local governments and indigenous organizations to develop protocols and guidelines for approaching and interacting with these tribes. This includes obtaining permission from the tribe and minimizing contact to prevent the spread of diseases.

4. What have you learned about uncontacted tribes through your research?

Through our research, we have learned that uncontacted tribes are incredibly resilient and have developed unique ways of surviving in their environments. They also have complex social structures and cultural practices that have remained unchanged for thousands of years. Our research has also shed light on the importance of preserving these tribes and their ways of life for future generations.

5. What are the ethical considerations when studying uncontacted tribes?

Studying uncontacted tribes raises ethical concerns, as these tribes have chosen to remain isolated from the outside world. Researchers must always prioritize the safety and well-being of the tribes and respect their right to self-determination. This includes obtaining informed consent and ensuring that their research does not harm or exploit the tribes in any way. Researchers must also consider the potential impact of their findings on the tribe and their culture.

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
5
Replies
161
Views
11K
  • General Discussion
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
12K
Replies
33
Views
8K
Back
Top