- #1
bananan
- 176
- 0
"string theory is a complete scientific failure" by Daniel Friedan
to make it clear, I am quoting Daniel Friedan, a former string theorist at Rutgers from hep-th/0204131
"The long-standing crisis of string theory"
"String theory has no credibility as a candidate theory of physics.
Recognizing failure is a userful part of the scientific strategy. Only
when failure is recognized can dead ends be abandoned and useable
pieces of failed programs be recycled. Aside from possible utility,
there is a responsibility to recognize failure. Recognizing failure
is an essential part of the scientific ethos. Complete scientific
failure must be recognized eventually."
Like Nietzsche's Death of God (the news of which require time)
apparently string theorists like RX, Lubos, Witten, Randall, Kaku, Greene, etc., have not yet heard the news.
Thanks bananan!
to make it clear, I am quoting Daniel Friedan, a former string theorist at Rutgers from hep-th/0204131
"The long-standing crisis of string theory"
"String theory has no credibility as a candidate theory of physics.
Recognizing failure is a userful part of the scientific strategy. Only
when failure is recognized can dead ends be abandoned and useable
pieces of failed programs be recycled. Aside from possible utility,
there is a responsibility to recognize failure. Recognizing failure
is an essential part of the scientific ethos. Complete scientific
failure must be recognized eventually."
Like Nietzsche's Death of God (the news of which require time)
apparently string theorists like RX, Lubos, Witten, Randall, Kaku, Greene, etc., have not yet heard the news.
Thanks bananan!