Integrating the Unsolvable: $\int x^xdx$

In summary, the professor said that the only way to solve the Integral x^x is with an infinite Taylor series expansion. Neither pen and paper nor any math program he has tried will solve the equation.
  • #1
airkapp
58
0
[tex]\int x^xdx[/tex]

After calculus today, our professor casually asked us to integrate the above problem. Most of us stated DNE (does not exist), or possibly x+1 / x+1 . He stated that both of these solutions were incorrect and than challenged us to write a paper on the subject which seemed ridiculous to me but here I am.

So a few questions...

Can this be done by Taylor Series expansion??

[tex]\int x^x dx=x + \frac{\left( -1 + 2\,\log (x) \right) \, x^2}{4} + \frac{\left( 2 - 6\,\log (x) + 9\,{\log (x)}^2 \right) \,x^3}{54} + \frac{\left( -3 + 12\,\log (x) - 24\,{\log (x)}^2 + 32\,{\log (x)}^3 \right) \,x^4}{768} + \frac{\left( 24 - 120\,\log (x) + 300\,{\log (x)}^2 - 500\,{\log (x)}^3 + 625\,{\log (x)}^4 \right) \,x^5}{75000} + \frac{\left( -5 + 30\,\log (x) - 90\,{\log (x)}^2 + 180\,{\log (x)}^3 - 270\,{\log (x)}^4 + 324\,{\log (x)}^5 \right) \,x^6}{233280} + {O(x^7)[/tex]










or is the answer simply dF/dx is x^x ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I've seen this many times, the last time someone jokingly asked me to solve it, to which the answer was solve you xxxxxxx :smile:

I asked a friend about this very thing and he said in fact the only way it can be done is with an infinite Taylor Expansion.

So there really is no "solution", and all maths programs I've tried won't solve it.

Nor will pen and paper.

[itex]\int e^xdx=e^x+C[/itex]

Same deal here basically, the solution is either non "renormalizable" or itself.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
There is no integral in terms of elementary functions. However, since that is a continuous function, it certainly does have an integral. That's why "does not exist" is incorrect.

I have no idea why anyone in your class would have thought the integral would be x+ 1/x+ 1. It should be easy to see that the derivative of that is not xx.
 
  • #4
I think the way to show that it can't be integrated in terms of an elementary function is using the Risch Algorithm (see http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RischAlgorithm.html" ). As for what the algorithm actually is, I have no idea!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
I read the wiki: I know I'm wrong in the head, according to that, if it is correct. If there is no elementary solution they use computer algorithms to get heuristic solutions which give approximations without proof. In other words only rough answers and there is no suggestion that they will remain infinitely good approximations. Which neatly explains why my maths program tells me to get bent :smile:

well actually it gives the solution

[itex]\int x^xdx\rightarrow \int x^xdx[/itex]

Which is the same thing :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Your first approach was good. Taylor Series. Integrate term-by-term. Then leave it as such. That's all you should do.
 
  • #7
[tex]\int_0^1 x^x dx = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (-1)^{n+1} n^{-n}[/tex]

-----

You cannot use a Taylor series for [tex]x^x[/tex] centered at 0 because the function is not defined on an open interval containing 0.

Consider the complex valued funtion [tex]f(z) = z^z = e^{z\log z}[/tex] this function is holomorphic on [tex]\mathbb{C} - (-\infty,0][/tex] so as along as we stay away from the branching of [tex]\log z[/tex] we can use the complex version of Taylor's theorem. For instance if we are on the neightborhood [tex]N(1,1) = \{z\in \mathbb{C} : |z-1|<1\}[/tex] then this function is holomorphic on this open disk and hence has a Taylor series expansion. So you need to change you center of series, for instance, for x=1 if you really want a Taylor series.
 
Last edited:
  • #8
Parthalan said:
I think the way to show that it can't be integrated in terms of an elementary function is using the Risch Algorithm (see http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RischAlgorithm.html" ). As for what the algorithm actually is, I have no idea!
My understanding of this article is that the Risch algorithm is a decision procedure used to determine the function of an indefinite integral. I don't gather that there actually is an algorithim that proves it CANNOT be integrated in terms of elementary functions. If there is, can someone post it?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #9
The mathematician Liouville showed that [tex]\int f(x) \exp [g(x)] \ dx[/tex] where [tex]g(x)[/tex] is non-constant is elementary for rational functions [tex]f(x),g(x)[/tex] if and only if there exists a rational function [tex]h(x)[/tex] which solves the ordinary differential equation: [tex]f(x) = h'(x) + h(x)g(x)[/tex].

I believe this can be modified to show [tex]\int x^x \ dx[/tex] is not an elementary function.
 
  • #10
Kummer said:
The mathematician Liouville showed that [tex]\int f(x) \exp [g(x)] \ dx[/tex] where [tex]g(x)[/tex] is non-constant is elementary for rational functions [tex]f(x),g(x)[/tex] if and only if there exists a rational function [tex]h(x)[/tex] which solves the ordinary differential equation: [tex]f(x) = h'(x) + h(x)g(x)[/tex].

I believe this can be modified to show [tex]\int x^x \ dx[/tex] is not an elementary function.
I'm interested in how this modification can be done. I've had a go at it without much luck.
 
  • #12
JJacquelin said:
A compendium of properties of the integral of x^x is provided in the paper "Sophomore's Dream Function" :
http://www.scribd.com/JJacquelin/documents
Great link. Thanks for that. I guess all that's left is to prove that it is indeed a non-elementary integral.
 

1. What is the meaning of "Integrating the Unsolvable"?

Integrating the Unsolvable refers to the process of finding the antiderivative of a function that cannot be easily integrated using standard methods. In the case of $\int x^xdx$, there is no known algebraic or trigonometric function that can represent its antiderivative.

2. Is it possible to solve $\int x^xdx$ using traditional integration techniques?

No, it is not possible to solve $\int x^xdx$ using traditional integration techniques. The function $x^x$ does not have a closed-form antiderivative, meaning it cannot be expressed using standard algebraic or trigonometric functions.

3. What are some alternative methods for solving $\int x^xdx$?

There are several alternative methods for solving $\int x^xdx$, such as using numerical integration techniques like Simpson's rule or Monte Carlo integration. Another approach is to use Taylor series expansion to approximate the antiderivative.

4. Why is $\int x^xdx$ considered an important unsolvable integral?

Integrals like $\int x^xdx$ are important because they challenge our understanding of traditional integration techniques and push us to develop new methods for solving them. They also have practical applications in fields like physics and engineering, where complicated functions often arise.

5. Are there any real-life applications for $\int x^xdx$?

Yes, there are several real-life applications for $\int x^xdx$. In physics, it can be used to calculate the work done by a variable force, and in economics, it is used to model exponential growth. It also has applications in thermodynamics, chemistry, and other fields.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
320
  • Calculus
Replies
1
Views
991
Replies
2
Views
938
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
164
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Calculus
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
339
Back
Top