About rendering physical reality

[ValenceE]

Hello all,

as far as rendering physical reality, isn't sampling frequency the main thing ?...


VE

 

[jaap de vries]

I don't understand your question, rendering physical reality and sampling are two different things. Samples can be used to validate models that render physical reality. The temporal resolution is important depending on the dominant frequency of the system. Your sampling frequency should be twice that. I don't know why this should be the main thing. spatial resolution and range are just as important. I you try to measure pressure oscillations of 0-1000 psi with a 0-10 psi transducer your in trouble regardless of the transducer's time constant.

 

[oswaler]

ry good question! Sampling frequency is definitely an important factor in rendering physical reality, but it is not the only one. In order to accurately depict the physical world, we also need to consider factors such as lighting, materials, and physics-based simulation. These elements all play a crucial role in creating a realistic representation of the world around us. Additionally, advancements in technology have allowed for more sophisticated rendering techniques, such as ray tracing, which further enhance the realism of virtual environments. Ultimately, it takes a combination of accurate sampling frequency and other factors to truly capture the intricacies of the physical world in a digital medium.