How Can Physics Calculate Seesaw Dynamics with Unequal Masses?

In summary: I think it is very unlikely that the lead sphere will stop at the fulcrum. The heavier mass will most likely continue moving at a much higher speed than the fulcrum, potentially reaching speeds exceeding the maximum velocity of the fulcrum. I'm not sure what the linear average speed of the seesaw would be at the lead sphere end, but I would estimate it to be significantly higher than the lighter mass. The lighter mass would most likely be accelerated to a high speed once it leaves the fulcrum.
  • #1
I2use
3
0
This is not homework, it is purely for my own enjoyment.

Say I have a lead sphere with a one meter radius, a mass of 465800N and a terminal velocity of 1290m/s. Say I also have a different spherical body of 685N. I now place the 685N body on one side of a seesaw of 20m in length and a height of 5m at the at the 10m mark.

How, from this information, can I work out how high I must drop the lead ball from to accelerate the 685N ball to >= 11200m/s? Also what is the relationship between mass and acceleration and how does it transfer to the other side of this idealized seesaw.


I'd be grateful if you didn't work it out but told me how to, as the working is what I find fun.

P.S I am ignoring things such as friction and assuming the 685N ball is launching vertically.

Thanks.

-R
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Before you can start calculating a solution, you must set a location for the fulcrum. For example, if the see-saw's fulcrum is put at the halfway (10 m) point, then I believe it is impossible for the heavy ball to launch the light ball at a speed any greater than approx. 2 × 1,290 m/s = 2,580 m/s. (I could be wrong—this is just my gut feeling.) By this reckoning, and making some simplifying assumptions, I would estimate that when the heavy ball lands at its terminal velocity of 1,290 m/s, the fulcrum should be placed approx. 1.87 m from the heavy ball's end of the see-saw in order to launch the light ball at the required 11,200 m/s. (Note: My answer is very approximate and may be refuted by other members.)
 
  • #3
Before you can start calculating a solution, you must set a location for the fulcrum.
The fulcrum is the centre - 5m high (I was trying to describe it but did not know the correct word). I would like to change the mass of the object instead of the fulcrum position. Also what is the equation for how fast an object approaches its terminal velocity?
 
  • #4
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
  • #6
Thank you, both of you, that link was very appropriate! I got this far:
Let it fall from mount Everest and the velocity will be 384.7m/s when it hits the ground. F=ma and a=finalvelocity-startingvelocity/time which would be 0-384.7/the time it takes for the ball to travel 10m which would be 0.025994281s so that = −14801.847 = a. Then * mass(in grams) = -703100751673.72
The Moment/Torque = Fd (where d = perpendicular distance from force application to fulcrum) =
-703100751673.72*10 = M = −7.031007517×10¹²
This is a stupidly large number! What have I done wrong? Also how do I get the other object's velocity from torque?
 
  • #7
You might want to think in terms of the velocity ratio. If the end of the seesaw where the lead sphere hits travels 10 meters over a certain time period, what distance does the other end travel over that period?
 
  • #8
I agree with PhanthomJay—it is the velocity ratio of the two ends of the see-saw that is important. In post #2 I hypothesised that the stationary ball will be launched at no greater than twice the speed of the end of the see-saw on which it sits. For a central fulcrum setup, the heavy falling ball must therefore strike the see-saw at (11,200 / 2) m/s = 5,600 m/s.
 
  • #9
This is a very hypothetical problem, of course. But assuming a rigid seesaw, do you think it is able to bring the massive lead sphere to a stop? What do you think might be the approximate linear average speed of the see saw at the lead sphere end in its 10 meter journey? What then would be the speed at the other end with the lighter mass on it? How high will the lighter mass go, neglecting air resistance? What is the acceleration of the lighter mass once it leaves the see saw?
 

1. What is the physics behind a seesaw?

The physics of a seesaw involves the principles of torque and the lever arm. When one person sits on one end of the seesaw, their weight creates a downward force that causes the other end to rise. This creates a rotation around the fulcrum, which is the point of support in the middle of the seesaw.

2. How does the weight of each person affect the seesaw?

The weight of each person affects the seesaw by creating a difference in torque. Torque is the product of the force applied and the distance from the fulcrum. The heavier person will apply a greater downward force and sit closer to the fulcrum, while the lighter person will apply a lesser force and sit further from the fulcrum. This imbalance in torque causes the seesaw to tilt towards the heavier person.

3. What is the role of the fulcrum in a seesaw?

The fulcrum is the point of support in the middle of the seesaw. It acts as a pivot point and allows the seesaw to rotate. Without the fulcrum, the seesaw would not be able to move.

4. Why does a seesaw move up and down?

A seesaw moves up and down because of the alternating forces and torques created by the two people sitting on each end. When one person pushes down on their end, their weight creates a downward force and a torque that causes the seesaw to rotate upwards. This motion continues as the other person on the other end pushes down, creating a back-and-forth motion.

5. Can a seesaw ever be balanced?

Yes, a seesaw can be balanced when the torque on each end is equal. This can be achieved by having two people of equal weight sit on each end or by adjusting the distance of one person from the fulcrum. When the seesaw is balanced, it will remain in a horizontal position and not move.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
942
Replies
2
Views
933
  • Classical Physics
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
4
Replies
121
Views
33K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
5K
Back
Top