New Intelligent Falling theory

In summary, a new "Intelligent Falling" theory has been proposed by the evangelical physics institution, the ECFR, which is based on a literal interpretation of the Bible. This has sparked humor and criticism, with some suggesting it is a ploy by other scientific organizations to discredit the concept of Intelligent Design. This is at least the fourth discussion thread on the topic.
  • #1
Donski
9
0
New "Intelligent Falling" theory

Check this out, lmao :rofl:

http://www.theonion.com/news/index.php?issue=4133&n=2
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
"Founded in 1987, the ECFR is the world's leading institution of evangelical physics, a branch of physics based on literal interpretation of the Bible."

I'm going to setup an institution of magical physics, a branch of physics based on the literal interpretation of Harry Potter.
 
  • #3
I think this is a fifth columnist group from either the American Physical Society or the National Academy of Science infiltrating the ECFR in order to subvert the Intelligent Designers by making them look laughable! ;)
 
  • #4
Is this Intelligent Falling thread number four now?
 
  • #5
brewnog said:
Is this Intelligent Falling thread number four now?
At least the fourth.
 

1. What is the New Intelligent Falling theory?

The New Intelligent Falling theory is a proposed alternative to the theory of gravity. It suggests that objects do not fall towards the Earth due to the force of gravity, but rather because they are being pushed down by an intelligent force. This theory is not widely accepted in the scientific community and is not supported by any evidence.

2. Who came up with the New Intelligent Falling theory?

The New Intelligent Falling theory was proposed by a group of individuals who reject the theory of gravity and believe in the existence of an intelligent force that controls the motion of objects. This theory has not been developed or endorsed by any reputable scientists or organizations.

3. How does the New Intelligent Falling theory differ from the theory of gravity?

The New Intelligent Falling theory differs from the theory of gravity in that it suggests that objects do not fall towards the Earth due to the force of gravity, but rather because they are being pushed down by an intelligent force. The theory of gravity, on the other hand, explains the motion of objects in terms of the force of gravity between masses.

4. Is there any scientific evidence to support the New Intelligent Falling theory?

No, there is no scientific evidence to support the New Intelligent Falling theory. The theory is not widely accepted in the scientific community and has not been tested or proven through experiments or observations. It is considered a pseudoscience and is not supported by any reputable scientists or organizations.

5. Why is the New Intelligent Falling theory not accepted in the scientific community?

The New Intelligent Falling theory is not accepted in the scientific community because it lacks any scientific evidence or support. It also goes against the well-established and widely accepted theory of gravity, which has been extensively tested and proven through experiments and observations. The New Intelligent Falling theory is considered a pseudoscience and is not taken seriously by the scientific community.

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
6K
  • General Discussion
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
762
  • General Discussion
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Computing and Technology
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
4K
Back
Top