## Proof by Induction

Is it a solid proof to show that the closure of a union equals the union of the closures of the sets via induction?
 PhysOrg.com science news on PhysOrg.com >> Ants and carnivorous plants conspire for mutualistic feeding>> Forecast for Titan: Wild weather could be ahead>> Researchers stitch defects into the world's thinnest semiconductor

 Quote by Bachelier Is it a solid proof to show that the closure of a union equals the union of the closures of the sets via induction?
How can we possibly know if your proof is valid if you don't show us your proof? Still, I'm not entirely sure why you would use induction here. Are you only considering the union of finitely many sets?
 A proof is a proof no matter if you use induction or some direct method as long as the logic of each step is impeccable. There are some math purists who disdain induction proofs for some theorems and prefer other styles of proof but thats beyond my math understanding to explain here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brouwer...rt_controversy

## Proof by Induction

 Quote by Number Nine How can we possibly know if your proof is valid if you don't show us your proof? Still, I'm not entirely sure why you would use induction here. Are you only considering the union of finitely many sets?
Yes of course. I'm talking about finite sets. I found a different way to prove it though. But the proof by induction crossed my mind.

I should work it out some time and post it here. It seems feasible.

 Quote by jedishrfu A proof is a proof no matter if you use induction or some direct method as long as the logic of each step is impeccable. There are some math purists who disdain induction proofs for some theorems and prefer other styles of proof but thats beyond my math understanding to explain here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brouwer...rt_controversy
great article. Thanks