Lagrangians in Quantum Mechanics

In summary, the principle of Lagrangian non-linearity does not always hold in classical and relativistic quantum mechanics. For relativistic quantum field theory the Lagrangian does contain higher order derivatives.
  • #1
lugita15
1,554
15
In classical mechanics the Lagrangian depends only on time, position, and velocity. It is not allowed to depend on any higher order derivatives of position. Does this principle remain true for Lagrangians in non-relativistic quantum mechanics? What about relativistic quantum field theory?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank You in Advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I don't think I've ever seen Lagrangian for a quantum mechanical theory that isn't a quantum field theory (except for string Lagrangians, which I haven't studied). Quantum field theory Lagrangians don't contain higher order derivatives because they would make the theory non-renormalizable. (It would probably be more correct to include those terms but they don't contribute much to physics at low energies, so it's safe to ignore them. This is fortunate since they are difficult to deal with mathematically).
 
  • #3
lugita15 said:
In classical mechanics the Lagrangian depends only on time, position, and velocity. It is not allowed to depend on any higher order derivatives of position. Does this principle remain true for Lagrangians in non-relativistic quantum mechanics? What about relativistic quantum field theory?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank You in Advance.

The lagrangian in QM is the same as in classical mechanics. You could derive Schrödingers equ from the Lagrangian using Feynmans path integral formulation as described in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_integral_formulation" .

In principle the Lagrangian could contain higher order derivatives. Using the variational derivatives to get the equation of motion you get for instance something like this for a second order time-derivative:

[tex]
\frac{d^2}{dt^2}\left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial x_{tt}}\right)
[/tex]

But if it is physical meaningful is another question... If you could transform your Lagrangian into a Hamiltonian, containing the canonic momentum p, then you could use it into an effective Schrödinger equation as well.

The relativistic non-quantum Lagrangian is not linear in the momentum either, but that's another story.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

What is a Lagrangian in Quantum Mechanics?

A Lagrangian in Quantum Mechanics is a mathematical function that describes the dynamics of a quantum system. It takes into account the potential and kinetic energy of the particles in the system, and is used to calculate the equations of motion for the system.

How is a Lagrangian different from a Hamiltonian?

A Hamiltonian is another mathematical function that is used to describe the dynamics of a quantum system. While the Lagrangian takes into account both kinetic and potential energy, the Hamiltonian only considers the total energy of the system. The Hamiltonian also includes the quantum operators for position and momentum, while the Lagrangian does not.

What is the importance of the Lagrangian in Quantum Mechanics?

The Lagrangian is a fundamental concept in Quantum Mechanics and is used to derive many important equations, such as the Schrödinger equation. It allows us to understand the behavior of quantum systems and make predictions about their future states.

How is the Lagrangian used in calculations?

The Lagrangian is used to calculate the equations of motion for a quantum system by using the principle of least action. This principle states that the actual path or motion of the system is the one that minimizes the action, which is the integral of the Lagrangian over time.

Can the Lagrangian be applied to all quantum systems?

Yes, the Lagrangian can be applied to all quantum systems, whether they are simple or complex. However, the calculations may become more complicated for systems with a large number of particles or interactions between particles. In these cases, approximations or simplifications may be necessary to solve for the equations of motion.

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
13
Views
754
Replies
5
Views
742
Replies
45
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
817
Back
Top