Where do the jets come from in quark-antiquark interactions?

  • Thread starter nabeel17
  • Start date
In summary: The quark and anti quark pair cannot exist alone due to color confinement so they form 2 jets that will go in opposite directions (to conserve momenta). Where do these jets come from? Do the quarks emit gluons that then form more quarks? Or are they spontaneously produced from the vacuum or something?The quark and anti quark pair cannot exist alone due to color confinement so they form 2 jets that will go in opposite directions (to conserve momenta). Where do these jets come from? Do the quarks emit gluons that then form more quarks? Or are they spontaneously produced from the vacuum or something?The quark and anti quark pair cannot exist alone due to color
  • #1
nabeel17
57
1
Consider

e+e* -> q+q* in the centre of mass frame. Where I am using star for antiparticle.

the quark and anti quark pair cannot exist alone due to color confinement so they form 2 jets that will go in opposite directions (to conserve momenta). Where do these jets come from? Do the quarks emit gluons that then form more quarks? Or are they spontaneously produced from the vacuum or something?

Also the jets can be mesons or baryons but if they form baryons then one jet has to be baryons and the other has to be anti-baryons to conserve baryon number correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Where do these jets come from? Do the quarks emit gluons that then form more quarks? Or are they spontaneously produced from the vacuum or something?
Both options are possible, but once you get to hadronization the perturbative description (in particular, everything you can write down as Feynman diagram) becomes problematic.
Also the jets can be mesons or baryons but if they form baryons then one jet has to be baryons and the other has to be anti-baryons to conserve baryon number correct?
A single particle is not a jet, but in total, the baryon number is conserved, sure.
 
  • #3
nabeel17 said:
Consider

e+e* -> q+q* in the centre of mass frame. Where I am using star for antiparticle.

the quark and anti quark pair cannot exist alone due to color confinement so they form 2 jets that will go in opposite directions (to conserve momenta). Where do these jets come from? Do the quarks emit gluons that then form more quarks?
Yes. Jets are primarily due to gluon emission, and arise from the acceleration of a color-charged particle, (a parton, either a quark or gluon), analogous to the bremsstrahlung emitted by an accelerating electromagnetically charged particle.

Jets are side effects, useful to the experimenter because they reveal the presence of the intermediate high-energy parton. But the original parton is not part of the jet. The jet itself is colorless. The original parton is pulled back.
 
  • #4
Bill_K said:
Yes. Jets are primarily due to gluon emission, and arise from the acceleration of a color-charged particle, (a parton, either a quark or gluon), analogous to the bremsstrahlung emitted by an accelerating electromagnetically charged particle.

Jets are side effects, useful to the experimenter because they reveal the presence of the intermediate high-energy parton. But the original parton is not part of the jet. The jet itself is colorless. The original parton is pulled back.

Ok so when the qq* pair are produced they will emit 2 gluons that will each turn to jets (in the case of 2 jet events)? Also these gluons must be very energetic to conserve energy of all the particles created in the jet right?
 
  • #5
No, the quarks initiate the jets. If you just get two jets, all the additional gluons and quarks go (roughly) in the same direction as one of the initial quarks.
Very energetic gluons, not aligned with a quark, would lead to additional jets.
 
  • #6
A single quark can radiate multiple gluons.

In the system you are talking about, the important thing is conserving the quantum numbers.

So baryon, lepton, colour bla bla bla.

This conservation is overall. So in fact, this means that the two jets of energetic bunches of particles have to know about one another. This is required to totally conserve the colourless state originated by the e e* beams.
 
  • #7
RGevo said:
This conservation is overall. So in fact, this means that the two jets of energetic bunches of particles have to know about one another. This is required to totally conserve the colourless state originated by the e e* beams.
No, each jet by itself is colorless.
 
  • #8
Yes. If you mean the reconstructed object of colourless particles is colourless, I agree.

I am talking about the formation of the colourless objects. Which is what the question is about. To form the colourless hadrons, the two quark initiated jets must know about one another.

In analogy with jets initiated by a colour octet (q q* pair from tree level gluon exchange) at a hadron collider. This must know about the rest of the colliding beams else colour confinement doesn't work.
 
  • #9
RGevo said:
I am talking about the formation of the colourless objects. Which is what the question is about. To form the colourless hadrons, the two quark initiated jets must know about one another.
Again, no. The original quarks are correlated, but the jets are both colorless and completely uncorrelated. I don't know how else to say this.

Suppose the original reaction produces a red quark and an antired antiquark, and let's follow what happens to the quark. Suppose it emits a red antiblue gluon. Typically this gluon will simply be reabsorbed. But suppose the quark (which is now blue) then emits a second gluon, one which is blue antired. The gluons taken together are colorless, and together they can separate a macroscopic distance, going on to create a jet by fragmenting into a number of hadrons. Again, the quark does not require "knowledge" of what color gluons it must emit to produce the jet, since any other choice will be reabsorbed.

The quark (which is now red) is pulled back, and reinteracts with the original antiquark, which in the meantime has done something which I don't know or care about.
 
  • #10
You are just repeating what I said.

"The quark (which is now red) is pulled back, and reinteracts with the original antiquark, which in the meantime has done something which I don't know or care about."

This interaction is what I am talking about and is important - without this interaction colour confinement would not work and the string/cluster models would make no sense. Also, local parton hadron duality (which is observed) says that the hadrons formed from the quarks should have the same quantum numbers and energy-momentum flow. So your suggestion that the quark spits off the colour singlet jets via gluons doesn't make sense to me.
 

1. What is fragmentation?

Fragmentation is the process by which a larger body or object is broken down into smaller pieces or fragments. This can occur naturally, such as in rock formations or glaciers, or through human activities like mining or demolition.

2. How does fragmentation occur in ecosystems?

In ecosystems, fragmentation typically occurs when large areas of habitat are divided into smaller, isolated patches due to human activities like urban development or deforestation. This can disrupt the natural balance of species and lead to loss of biodiversity and ecological stability.

3. What are the consequences of fragmentation?

The consequences of fragmentation can be significant, including loss of habitat and biodiversity, disruption of species interactions and food webs, and increased vulnerability to environmental disturbances like natural disasters or climate change. It can also negatively impact human communities that rely on healthy ecosystems for resources and services.

4. Can fragmentation be reversed?

In some cases, fragmentation can be reversed or mitigated through conservation efforts such as habitat restoration, creation of wildlife corridors, and sustainable land use practices. However, it is important to prevent fragmentation in the first place as restoring fragmented ecosystems can be challenging and costly.

5. How can we minimize fragmentation?

To minimize fragmentation, it is important to consider the potential impacts on ecosystems before engaging in activities such as land development and resource extraction. Strategies like smart urban planning, sustainable land use practices, and protected areas can help limit the effects of fragmentation on ecosystems and promote more sustainable development.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
2
Replies
44
Views
9K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
879
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top