Vertical vs Horizontal takeoff (VTO vs HTO)

In summary, it is believed that horizontal takeoff is more cost-effective and energy efficient compared to vertical takeoff due to the use of wings for lift rather than relying solely on engine power to fight gravity. Additionally, the maximum takeoff weight and thrust capabilities of current aircraft make vertical takeoff impractical.
  • #1
DavidRatcliff
1
0
Supposedly taking off horizontally costs less and is more energy efficient than vertical takeoff.

Aside from the issues of staging, and rocket vs. propeller, does anyone know why HTO is better than VTO?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Welcome to PF, David.
In a vertical take-off, the engine has to supply all of the effort to fight gravity. When rolling, the wings provide the lift and the engine just has to provide lateral motion.
 
  • #3
I just looked up some quick figures. A typical 747-400 has a maximum take-off weight of 875,000 lb; while the thrust it's engines produce is around 60,000 lb.

So you see...
 
  • #4
minger said:
I just looked up some quick figures. A typical 747-400 has a maximum take-off weight of 875,000 lb; while the thrust it's engines produce is around 60,000 lb.

So you see...

per engine!
 
  • #5
and unless that thing has a dozen engines mounted god knows where, it's not going to VTO.
 

1. What is the difference between vertical and horizontal takeoff?

Vertical takeoff (VTO) refers to the ability of an aircraft to take off and land vertically, without the need for a runway. Horizontal takeoff (HTO) is the traditional method of takeoff where an aircraft uses a runway to gain enough speed and lift to take off.

2. Which method of takeoff is more efficient?

It depends on the specific aircraft and its purpose. Generally, vertical takeoff is more efficient for military aircraft that need to operate in small or remote areas. Horizontal takeoff is more efficient for commercial airliners and larger aircraft that need to transport a large number of passengers or cargo.

3. What are the advantages of vertical takeoff?

Vertical takeoff eliminates the need for a runway, allowing an aircraft to take off and land in smaller or more confined spaces. This can be useful for military operations or emergency situations. It also allows for greater flexibility in flight paths and can reduce travel time.

4. What are the disadvantages of vertical takeoff?

Vertical takeoff requires more energy and fuel, making it less efficient for larger aircraft. It also requires more advanced technology and specialized training for pilots. Additionally, vertical takeoff can be more expensive and may not be suitable for all types of aircraft.

5. Is there a hybrid method of takeoff that combines vertical and horizontal methods?

Yes, there are aircraft that have the ability to perform both vertical and horizontal takeoff. These aircraft, known as VTOL (vertical takeoff and landing) or STOL (short takeoff and landing) aircraft, can take off vertically and then transition to horizontal flight. This allows for greater flexibility and efficiency in flight operations.

Similar threads

  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
3
Views
185
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
994
  • STEM Educators and Teaching
Replies
5
Views
631
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
4
Replies
120
Views
15K
Replies
4
Views
881
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
63
Views
7K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
28
Views
2K
Back
Top