A thought on quantum correlations and EPR

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of quantum correlations and how it was challenged by Einstein, Podolski, and Rosen in 1935. It also brings up Feynman's QED and the idea of particles and antiparticles moving forward and backward in time. The question is posed whether the set up of the experiment can be seen as equivalent to antiparticles running backward in time and then interacting. It is clarified that in annihilation/creation experiments, both particles and antiparticles travel in the same direction but with opposite time directions.
  • #1
pat_connell
126
0
Consider the usual set up in regard to showing that quantum correlations exist. Recall how Einstein, Podolski and Rosen in there 1935 argued that quantum mechanics must be incomplete since we can tell immediately the state of a particle A at time t by measuring the state of a particle B it interacted with, at time t = 0, for a short period of time say dt, i.e. they have been separated for a time t - dt .
Now we know from Feynman's QED that " a particle going forward in time is equivalent to it's antiparticle going backward in time". can we say that the set up of the experiment is equivalent to to anti particles running backwards in time and then interacting?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
In a particle-antiparticle creation, if a particle moves along +x axis and its antiparticle along -x axis, can we say that it is moving in -t but +x.
 
  • #3
i think my original question on second thoughts might have been a little silly. the anti- particles run backward in time. They interact and then continue to run backward in time, but what is confusing is the fact that the set up of the experiment runs forward in time for us.

in answer to your question anuj, in any annihilation/ creation experiment both particle and antiparticle travel in the +x direction, but one the particle travels in +t and the antiparticle goes the opposite way.
 

1. What is quantum correlation?

Quantum correlation refers to the dependence or connection between two or more quantum systems, where the measurement of one system affects the state of the other system, even when they are physically separated.

2. What is the EPR paradox?

The EPR (Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen) paradox is a thought experiment proposed by Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen in 1935. It highlights the apparent conflict between quantum mechanics and the classical concept of local realism, where particles have definite properties even when unobserved.

3. How does the concept of quantum correlation relate to the EPR paradox?

In the EPR paradox, two entangled particles are created in a way that their properties are correlated. According to quantum mechanics, measuring one of the particles will instantaneously determine the state of the other particle, even if they are separated by a large distance. This phenomenon is known as quantum correlation and it is one of the key aspects of the EPR paradox.

4. How is the concept of quantum correlation tested experimentally?

Quantum correlation can be tested experimentally through various methods, such as Bell tests, where the measurements of entangled particles are compared to classical predictions. Another method is quantum teleportation, where information is transferred between two particles without any physical connection, demonstrating the presence of quantum correlation.

5. What are the potential applications of quantum correlation?

Quantum correlation has potential applications in quantum computing, quantum cryptography, and quantum communication. It can also be used to study fundamental principles of quantum mechanics and to test the limits of our current understanding of the universe.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
786
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
966
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
956
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
257
Back
Top