Register to reply

Why in SUSY we tend to use 2- components

by Safinaz
Tags: components, supersymmetry, susy, tend
Share this thread:
Safinaz
#1
Nov24-13, 09:08 AM
P: 42
Hi all,

why in SUSY we tend to use 2- components Weyl spinor field
not the ordinary Dirac filed ..

Regards,
Safinaz
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Optimum inertial self-propulsion design for snowman-like nanorobot
The Quantum Cheshire Cat: Can neutrons be located at a different place than their own spin?
A transistor-like amplifier for single photons
dauto
#2
Nov24-13, 10:57 AM
Thanks
P: 1,948
It's also easier to work in the Standard Model using Weyl spinors instead of Dirac spinors. That's because the left handed Weyl spinors and the right handed Weyl spinors belong to two different representations of the electroweak gauge group. It makes more sense to deal with them separately.
Safinaz
#3
Nov24-13, 11:37 AM
P: 42
Is that also to match the transformation from 2- complex components scalar filed (4-degrees of freedom)
to 2- components Weyl spinor filed which are also complex so we have 4-degrees of freedom as well, instead
of Dirac filed which will be twice ..

dauto
#4
Nov24-13, 11:47 AM
Thanks
P: 1,948
Why in SUSY we tend to use 2- components

Yes, one Dirac field with four degrees of freedom corresponds to two Weyl fields with two degrees each.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
No supersymmetry Beyond the Standard Model 2
What is supersymmetry High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 7
Supersymmetry isn't right ? Beyond the Standard Model 4
Supersymmetry n=8 Beyond the Standard Model 1
Supersymmetry Advanced Physics Homework 0