Difference between gapless excitations and Goldstone bosonsby sam12 Tags: condensed matter, symmetry breaking 

#1
Sep413, 08:42 AM

P: 3

I have been looking around on the web and in books to clarify this, but can't find a good explanation describing relationship/difference between gapless modes/excitations and Goldsone modes/bosons in Condensed matter physics.
Does the term "gapless modes" mean that no energy is required for these modes/excitations or that only an infinitesimal amount of energy is required for such excitations? If Goldstone modes/excitations require some(small) amount of energy (as mentioned in Ref:http://web.mit.edu/8.334/www/lectures/lec3.pdf), how can they ever be gapless? Does a previously gapless mode/excitation develop a gap or remain gapless if a continuous symmetry is spontaneously broken in a system? 



#2
Sep413, 06:27 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 2,606

It is possible for a system to develop a mass gap if we allow additional interactions. For instance, if we couple the complex scalar ##\psi(x)## in the LG model to a gauge field, we will find a mass gap. In the false vacuum we have the massive field ##\psi(x)## and a massless gauge field ##A_\mu(x)##. In the true vacuum, we have a massive real scalar ##\bar{\psi}## and a massive gauge field ##B_\mu(x)##, that is actually composed of the 2 degrees of freedom from ##A_\mu## and the single degree of freedom from the wouldbe Goldstone boson ##\theta(x)##. This model is related to what is usually called the abelian Higgs model. 



#3
Sep513, 01:55 AM

Sci Advisor
P: 3,380

The gap mode vanishes in the limit k>0. So a long wavelength exitation looks different than the vacuum over a large extent of space, yet it is energetically practically degenerate, i.e. there are different vacuum states. That is the definition of a broken symmetry, so every gapless mode can be viewed as resulting from symmetry breaking. The other direction does not always work as interactions have to be short range for broken symmetry modes to be gapless.




#4
Sep513, 09:51 AM

P: 29

Difference between gapless excitations and Goldstone bosons
In the context of field theory, a gap in dispersion relation really means a mass. So a gapless excitation, like goldstone boson, doesn't have a mass hence is always relativistic. This is like the situation of photon in relativity.




#5
Sep513, 10:36 AM

Sci Advisor
P: 3,380

I would be careful with the word "relativistic". If E is a linear function of k for a gapless mode, then it may be called massless as it is dispersion free and hence a wavepacket will move with the constant speed v= E/hbar k. However, almost never does this speed coincide with the speed of light in vacuo, so it is certainly not relativistically invariant, which is already clear by the solid matrix forming a special system of reference.




#6
Sep513, 01:40 PM

P: 29




Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Reading off masses of eight goldstone bosons from chiral Lagrangian mass term  High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics  5  
What is meant by saying that the Goldstonebosons are "eaten" by gauge bosons?  High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics  3  
Goldstone bosons in Models with global symmetry, broken by Orbifolding  Beyond the Standard Model  4  
Kaluza Klein, Goldstone Bosons, symmetries obliging masslessness???  High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics  0  
Goldstone bosons 1st order phase transition  Quantum Physics  13 