The concept of rotational equilibrium


by hms.tech
Tags: concept, equilibrium, rotational
hms.tech
hms.tech is offline
#1
Apr10-13, 05:07 AM
P: 247
Here is a text from my Physics Book :

The net external torque on the object about any axis must be zero for it to be in rotational equilibrium.

I divide the torques into two categories, anticlockwise and clockwise. (This approach works fine for 2-D objects but will it work for 3-D objects as well ?)

I think i found an error in my book or it might be possible that there is something wrong with my judgment. There was this quick quiz question and it asked whether the object is in rotational equilibrium. Click image for larger version

Name:	Capture.PNG
Views:	13
Size:	23.2 KB
ID:	57700

I say no, it shouldn't and i can prove it : Click image for larger version

Name:	Untitled.png
Views:	30
Size:	28.1 KB
ID:	57701
Consider the black spot as the pivot and if i were to take moments about this point of the two forces, i would find that [itex]F_{1}[/itex] and [itex]F_{2}[/itex] each provide a clockwise torque !

Yes i agree that the net torque about their point of intersection will be zero but not about the black spot(which also lies in the object)
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Physicists design quantum switches which can be activated by single photons
'Dressed' laser aimed at clouds may be key to inducing rain, lightning
Higher-order nonlinear optical processes observed using the SACLA X-ray free-electron laser
cactusCookies
cactusCookies is offline
#2
Apr10-13, 05:30 AM
P: 4
Hi hms.tech, did the question specify whether or not the point of intersection of the three force vectors was also the center of mass?
hms.tech
hms.tech is offline
#3
Apr10-13, 05:32 AM
P: 247
Quote Quote by cactusCookies View Post
Hi hms.tech, did the question specify whether or not the point of intersection of the three force vectors was also the center of mass?
Not at all

cactusCookies
cactusCookies is offline
#4
Apr10-13, 06:01 AM
P: 4

The concept of rotational equilibrium


Quote Quote by hms.tech View Post
Not at all
Then I'm inclined to agree with you!

If it was the center of mass, the object would be in rotational equilibrium. If you take your pivot axis at the black dot as you suggested, don't forget to add in the inertia force to produce a torque that counters the torque from the applied force and all is right in the world again :)
Doc Al
Doc Al is online now
#5
Apr10-13, 06:09 AM
Mentor
Doc Al's Avatar
P: 40,887
What book are you using? Are you saying that the text claimed that the pictured object was in rotational equilibrium?
hms.tech
hms.tech is offline
#6
Apr10-13, 07:08 AM
P: 247
Quote Quote by Doc Al View Post
What book are you using? Are you saying that the text claimed that the pictured object was in rotational equilibrium?
This book was recommended as a great book for introductory physics by ppl here on PF
Physics for Scientists & Engineers by Serway.

As mentioned in the first post, there was this quiz on page 349~350 which asked whether the given object is in equilibrium, i stumbled across it while reading the text.

The answer given at the back of the book says this :
The object is in torque equilibrium but not force equilibrium.

I am seriously confused, is that possible ?
arildno
arildno is offline
#7
Apr10-13, 07:48 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 12,016
"The object is in torque equilibrium but not force equilibrium.

I am seriously confused, is that possible?"

Sure. Consider an object in free fall. It experiences no torque, but definitely a force.
Doc Al
Doc Al is online now
#8
Apr10-13, 07:50 AM
Mentor
Doc Al's Avatar
P: 40,887
Quote Quote by hms.tech View Post
The answer given at the back of the book says this :
The object is in torque equilibrium but not force equilibrium.

I am seriously confused, is that possible ?
Is it possible for an object to be in torque equilibrium but not force equilibrium? Only if the torque about the center of mass is zero. In which case the object will have a translational acceleration, but not a rotational acceleration about its center of mass. (Usually these issues are addressed in your next mechanics course. I doubt Serway covers these cases.)

I would say that the book is wrong about that question. (Unless they are talking about the line of action intersecting at the center of mass. But I don't think the book is covering such issues.)
hms.tech
hms.tech is offline
#9
Apr10-13, 08:24 AM
P: 247
Quote Quote by Doc Al View Post
Is it possible for an object to be in torque equilibrium but not force equilibrium? Only if the torque about the center of mass is zero. In which case the object will have a translational acceleration, but not a rotational acceleration about its center of mass. (Usually these issues are addressed in your next mechanics course. I doubt Serway covers these cases.)

I would say that the book is wrong about that question. (Unless they are talking about the line of action intersecting at the center of mass. But I don't think the book is covering such issues.)
I cant see the logic in your answer .
I think that even if all three forces were passing through the Center of mass, there MIGHT still be a net torque !
Let me prove it : http://www.physicsforums.com/attachm...chmentid=57701

Consider this diagram in which the three forces are passing through the Center of mass (I am assuming this to prove my point). A point (black) is taken to be the pivot. Will there not be a net torque about this black spot ? (i think there will. )

Both [itex]F_{1}[/itex] and [itex]F_{2}[/itex] exert a clockwise torque ! ( i really cant see the possibility of an inertia force on the center of mass as suggested by cactusCookies; it does not make sense)
Doc Al
Doc Al is online now
#10
Apr10-13, 08:45 AM
Mentor
Doc Al's Avatar
P: 40,887
Quote Quote by hms.tech View Post
I cant see the logic in your answer .
I think that even if all three forces were passing through the Center of mass, there MIGHT still be a net torque !
Let me prove it : http://www.physicsforums.com/attachm...chmentid=57701

Consider this diagram in which the three forces are passing through the Center of mass (I am assuming this to prove my point). A point (black) is taken to be the pivot. Will there not be a net torque about this black spot ? (i think there will. )
Is there a torque about the black spot? Sure. But be careful about what conclusions you draw from that, since the black spot is accelerating. It still turns out that there will be no rotational acceleration of the object.

Both [itex]F_{1}[/itex] and [itex]F_{2}[/itex] exert a clockwise torque ! ( i really cant see the possibility of an inertia force on the center of mass as suggested by cactusCookies; it does not make sense)
One way of dealing with the fact that you are using an accelerating point as your pivot is by introducing inertial forces as cactusCookies stated. (The center of mass is a special point--it doesn't matter if it is accelerating or not.)

As I hinted, these more advanced issues are dealt with in your next mechanics course (e.g., Classical Mechanics).


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Rotational Mechanics(The concept of spinning) Introductory Physics Homework 6
torque and equilibrium; concept problem Introductory Physics Homework 2
Rotational Equilibrium and Rotational Dynamics problem Introductory Physics Homework 1
Rotational Equilibrium and Rotational Dynamics Introductory Physics Homework 1
Rotational equilibrium, subtending, and rotational acceleration Introductory Physics Homework 1