you see, i think blood is iron based so it is red, at least that's what they taught in my classes (year nine of a grammar schoolmatthyaouw said:
). but they also told that blood has plasma which is much of water."Dammit Jim, I'm a Physicist, not a Chemist!"matthyaouw said:
Duh guys, he knew that, can'tcha catch a joke? He was skillfully pointing out that guy's error. That blood is not hemoglobin-based, blood is not copper-based, blood is water based.matthyaouw said:
The concept of "Blue Blood" in relation to early humans refers to the belief that certain ancient civilizations, such as the ancient Egyptians and Incas, had a distinct blue tint to their skin due to their royal or elite status.
No, there is no scientific evidence to support the existence of "Blue Blood" in early humans. The idea of blue blood is based on ancient myths and legends, and there is no genetic or biological basis for it.
The belief in "Blue Blood" originated from the visible differences between the ruling class and the common people in ancient societies. The rulers often had access to better diets and lifestyles, which may have given them a healthier and more vibrant appearance compared to the common people.
No, there are no modern-day examples of "Blue Blood" in humans. The idea of blue blood has been debunked by modern science and is now recognized as a myth.
The concept of "Blue Blood" has played a significant role in shaping social hierarchies and maintaining the power of the ruling class in ancient civilizations. It perpetuated the idea that those with blue blood were superior and entitled to rule, while the common people were seen as inferior.