Does Relativistic Kinetic Energy Increase with Velocity?

  • Thread starter accountkiller
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Relativistic
In summary: Therefore, the proton gains the same amount of kinetic energy during one meter of travel regardless of its speed.
  • #1
accountkiller
121
0
So, there is a sentence in my book, along with a graph, stating that "relativistic kinetic energy becomes infinite as v approaches c."

But then in a concept problem, it says "A proton is accelerated from rest by a constant force that always points in the direction of the particle's motion. Compared to the amount of kinetic energy that the proton gains during the first meter of its travel, how much kinetic energy does it gain during one meter of travel while it's moving at 99% of the speed of light"

The answer is the same, it says, because there is no change in kinetic energy since there is constant force. But I thought since the first statement above said that kinetic energy --> infinity as v -- c... means that as v increases, KE increases, right? But that is not so in the problem.

Could someone explain why this is so?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
There are three variables, x, v, and K (kinetic energy). There is a linear relationship between x and K (by the work-kinetic energy theorem). There is a nonlinear relationship between these variables and v.
 
  • #3
mbradar2 said:
The answer is the same, it says, because there is no change in kinetic energy since there is constant force. But I thought since the first statement above said that kinetic energy --> infinity as v -- c... means that as v increases, KE increases, right? But that is not so in the problem.
The phrase "the answer is the same" doesn't say that the energy never increases, only that it increases by the same amount in both scenarios. (I haven't thought about the actual problem yet, so I'm just commenting on what seems to be a misinterpretation of what you read).
 
  • #4
mbradar2 said:
So, there is a sentence in my book, along with a graph, stating that "relativistic kinetic energy becomes infinite as v approaches c."

But then in a concept problem, it says "A proton is accelerated from rest by a constant force that always points in the direction of the particle's motion. Compared to the amount of kinetic energy that the proton gains during the first meter of its travel, how much kinetic energy does it gain during one meter of travel while it's moving at 99% of the speed of light"

The answer is the same, it says, because there is no change in kinetic energy since there is constant force. But I thought since the first statement above said that kinetic energy --> infinity as v -- c... means that as v increases, KE increases, right? But that is not so in the problem.

Could someone explain why this is so?
Thanks!

You can find the answer to your problem https://www.physicsforums.com/blog.php?b=1928 . The answer is :

[tex]\Delta W =m_0c^2(\gamma(v)-1)[/tex] which also happens to be (by definition) the variation of the kinetic energy of the particle.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
mbradar2 said:
"A proton is accelerated from rest by a constant force that always points in the direction of the particle's motion. Compared to the amount of kinetic energy that the proton gains during the first meter of its travel, how much kinetic energy does it gain during one meter of travel while it's moving at 99% of the speed of light"
Work equals force times distance, so if the force is the same then the energy/distance is the same.
 

1. What is the definition of relativistic work and energy?

Relativistic work and energy refer to the concepts of work and energy in the context of Einstein's theory of relativity. In this theory, the laws of physics are the same for all observers in uniform motion, and the speed of light is constant. This leads to a different understanding of work and energy than in classical physics.

2. How is relativistic work and energy different from classical work and energy?

In classical physics, work is defined as the force applied to an object multiplied by the distance the object moves in the direction of the force. Energy is then defined as the ability to do work. In relativistic physics, work and energy are defined in terms of the change in an object's mass and its velocity. This is due to the fact that in relativity, mass and energy are equivalent and can be converted into each other.

3. What is the equation for calculating relativistic work and energy?

The equation for relativistic work and energy is E = mc^2, where E is energy, m is mass, and c is the speed of light. This equation shows the relationship between mass and energy, and how energy can be converted into mass and vice versa. It is one of the most famous equations in physics and is known as the mass-energy equivalence equation.

4. How does relativistic work and energy relate to the theory of relativity?

The theory of relativity states that the laws of physics are the same for all observers in uniform motion. This includes the laws of work and energy. In relativity, the concept of mass and energy being equivalent is crucial in understanding the relationship between work and energy. It also explains how energy can be converted into mass and vice versa, as seen in nuclear reactions.

5. What are some real-world applications of relativistic work and energy?

Relativistic work and energy have many real-world applications, especially in nuclear physics and astrophysics. For example, in nuclear reactors, the conversion of mass into energy is utilized to produce large amounts of energy. In astrophysics, the understanding of relativistic work and energy is crucial in explaining the behavior of stars and other celestial bodies. Additionally, the mass-energy equivalence equation has also been used in the development of nuclear weapons and in medical technologies such as PET scans.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
102
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
55
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
62
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
902
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
28
Views
490
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
Back
Top