Analogy for magnetism in the nuclear strong force?

In summary: I think the question of how they work is pretty interesting, and I want to include some description of it in a paper I'm writing for class.
  • #1
pantheid
53
0
Whenever people begin to explain the nuclear strong force, they relate it to electricity. I was wondering if color charges, besides also interacting with one another in a way that's analogous to electricity, can also interact in a way that's analogous to magnetism. I have asked some professors and they said "maybe," but were unfamiliar with it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yes, the strong force involves both "chromoelectricity" and "chromomagnetism." One of the deep insights of special relativity is that electricity and magnetism are two aspects of the same thing, one total electromagnetic field. Similarly there is a chromoelectric field and a chromomagnetic field that are both aspects of one total color field.
 
  • #3
The_Duck said:
Yes, the strong force involves both "chromoelectricity" and "chromomagnetism." One of the deep insights of special relativity is that electricity and magnetism are two aspects of the same thing, one total electromagnetic field. Similarly there is a chromoelectric field and a chromomagnetic field that are both aspects of one total color field.

There are in fact eight of each (though in QFT the 4-potential is most often considered the fundamental fields and the electromagnetic field is considered a derived field.)
 
  • #4
The_Duck said:
Yes, the strong force involves both "chromoelectricity" and "chromomagnetism."
Do quarks have an anomalous chromomagnetic moment?
 
  • #5
dauto said:
There are in fact eight of each (though in QFT the 4-potential is most often considered the fundamental fields and the electromagnetic field is considered a derived field.)

sorry, but eight of what exactly?
 
  • #6
And can someone explain how a chromomagnetic field would work if all color-charges must be in bound states?
 
  • #7
There are colour effects inherent in descriptions of particle collisions.

See the Lund string model for example. Colour effects are all around at the Lhc where coloured objects are interacting.

Some of these models which include dipole colour interactions are approximations of things we still haven't calculated to high enough accuracy yet.
 
  • #8
And these things happen after a collision before these coloured objects form into bound objects(hadronization which occurs at a later time scale)
 
  • #9
pantheid said:
sorry, but eight of what exactly?

Eight independent set of fields, each equivalent (up to a certain point) to the set of electromagnetic fields.
 
  • #10
Bill_K said:
Do quarks have an anomalous chromomagnetic moment?

I assume so; for example in QCD at one loop you can draw a diagram correcting the quark-quark-gluon vertex that looks exactly like the one-loop QED diagram that corrects the electron-electron-photon vertex and which gives rise to the anomalous magnetic dipole moment of the electron. So at least in perturbation theory you can use that to calculate an anomalous chromomagnetic dipole moment.

That might only work perturbatively, though. In QED you can define the magnetic dipole moment as the derivative of the energy of the one-electron state with respect to the external magnetic field. But in QCD quarks are confined so it's hard to speak of a one-quark state. Maybe nonperturbatively the magnetic dipole moment of a quark is ill-defined?

pantheid said:
And can someone explain how a chromomagnetic field would work if all color-charges must be in bound states?

The fields are also confined; within a proton, say, there is a bundle of quarks all bound together by chromoelectric and chromomagnetic fields. These fields cannot extend far outside the proton, just as the quarks cannot stray outside proton.

Why are you worried about chromomagnetic fields as opposed to chromoelectric fields?
 
Last edited:
  • #11
The fields are also confined; within a proton, say, there is a bundle of quarks all bound together by chromoelectric and chromomagnetic fields. These fields cannot extend far outside the proton, just as the quarks cannot stray outside proton.

Why are you worried about chromomagnetic fields as opposed to chromoelectric fields?[/QUOTE]

I think the question of how they work is pretty interesting, and I want to include some description of it in a paper I'm writing for class.
 
  • #12
Bill_K said:
Do quarks have an anomalous chromomagnetic moment?
Yes, it leads to a strong spin-spin interaction just like the atomic hyperfine interaction.
This has been known since the start of the quark model, but seems to have been forgotten.
 

1. What is an analogy for magnetism in the nuclear strong force?

The analogy for magnetism in the nuclear strong force is the concept of spin. Just like how magnets have a north and south pole, particles in the nucleus also have a spin, or a magnetic moment, which can interact with each other.

2. How does the analogy of spin apply to the nuclear strong force?

The analogy of spin in the nuclear strong force refers to the orientation of the particles' magnetic moment, which can either be aligned or anti-aligned. This orientation affects the strength of the nuclear force between particles.

3. Can you explain the relationship between magnetism and the nuclear strong force?

Magnetism and the nuclear strong force are both fundamental forces of nature. While magnetism is responsible for the attraction and repulsion of charged particles, the nuclear strong force holds together the particles in the nucleus. The analogy of spin helps us understand how these forces interact with each other.

4. Are there any other analogies for magnetism in the nuclear strong force?

Another analogy for magnetism in the nuclear strong force is the concept of color charge. Similar to how magnets have a positive and negative charge, particles in the nucleus also have a color charge, which can interact and influence the strength of the nuclear force.

5. How does understanding the analogy for magnetism in the nuclear strong force benefit scientific research?

Understanding the analogy for magnetism in the nuclear strong force allows scientists to better study and predict the behavior of particles in the nucleus. This can lead to advancements in nuclear physics and technology, as well as a deeper understanding of the fundamental forces of nature.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
912
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top