Iraqis to lead role for security by years end

In summary, the conversation discusses the current situation in Iraq with regards to security and the role of the Iraqi government and its forces. The Prime Minister, Nouri al-Maliki, has stated that Iraqi forces will take over security in most of the country by the end of the year, with a few exceptions. However, there is skepticism and doubt surrounding this statement, with some questioning the ability of the Iraqi government and its forces to handle the situation. Despite this, there are still many Iraqis who are hoping for an end to the conflict so they can resume their normal lives.
  • #1
edward
62
166
This sounds good, but who are they kidding, the new Iraqi govenment officials can't even travel outside of the greeen zone. Policemen are issued a single Glock handgun, and soldiers are issued an AK47.

On the other side the insergents have morters, RPG's, rockets and heavy machine guns. Dozens of newly trained Iraqi soldiers deserted recently when they found out that they would not be serving in their home towns.

In reality The situation in Iraq hasn't changed in the past several years. This sounds like American election year hype and it is coming from an Iraqi.

Iraqis to assume lead role for security by year's end, leader says

BY LIZ SLY
Chicago Tribune
BAGHDAD, Iraq - Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki said Monday that Iraqi forces will assume the lead role for security from U.S. forces across most of Iraq by the end of the year, with the exception of "hot spots" such as Baghdad and the restive western province of Anbar.

Speaking during a surprise visit to Baghdad by Britain's Tony Blair intended to show support for Iraq's newly installed government, al-Maliki said the two southern provinces of Amara and Samawah, which are under British control, would be handed over to Iraqi forces next month, with "most of the provinces" to follow in the months after that.

His timetable coincides closely with the targets set by the U.S. military, which aims to give Iraqis the lead role for security over all of Iraq by the end of the year, according to the U.S. general in charge of training the Iraqi army.
http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/world/14636375.htm
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I'll believe that when I see it. :rolleyes:

Frankly, I am deeply skeptical, almost to the point of cynicism.

I do know that there are many Iraqis, both Sunni and Shia, and Kurd, who simply want the conflict to end, so that they can get on with normal lives. May it be so!
 
  • #3


I would say that while it is certainly a positive step for Iraqis to take on a larger role in their own security, there are still many challenges and obstacles that need to be addressed. The fact that Iraqi government officials are unable to travel outside of the green zone and that newly trained soldiers are deserting due to concerns about serving in their home towns is concerning. It is also worrying that insurgents have access to more advanced weapons than Iraqi police and soldiers.

While it is important to have a timeline and goals for Iraqi forces to take over security, it is equally important to ensure that they are properly equipped, trained, and supported in their efforts. Without addressing these issues, it is unlikely that the situation in Iraq will see significant improvement. It is also important for the international community to continue supporting and assisting Iraq in their efforts towards security and stability.
 

1. What is the significance of Iraqis taking on a lead role for security by the end of the year?

The significance of this development is that it marks a major step towards Iraq's independence and self-governance. It shows that the Iraqi government and security forces are capable of handling the country's security without relying on foreign assistance.

2. How will this affect the presence of foreign troops in Iraq?

This shift towards Iraqi-led security means that foreign troops will likely play a smaller role in the country. It is expected that their numbers will decrease as they transition to a support and advisory role rather than being directly involved in security operations.

3. What challenges might Iraq face in taking on this lead role for security?

There are several challenges that Iraq may face in this transition, including potential gaps in training and resources for their security forces, as well as the ongoing threat of terrorist groups and internal conflicts. Additionally, there may be political and logistical challenges to coordinating and managing the security efforts of multiple Iraqi agencies.

4. Will this lead to a complete withdrawal of foreign troops from Iraq?

No, it is unlikely that there will be a complete withdrawal of foreign troops from Iraq in the near future. While their numbers may decrease, it is expected that they will maintain a presence in the country to continue supporting and advising the Iraqi security forces.

5. What does this mean for the overall stability and security of Iraq?

This shift towards Iraqi-led security is a positive step towards the country's stability and security. It demonstrates their progress in rebuilding and strengthening their own security capabilities. However, it is important to note that there are still challenges and threats that Iraq will need to address in order to maintain long-term stability and security.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
6
Replies
193
Views
20K
  • General Discussion
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
29
Views
9K
  • General Discussion
Replies
10
Views
3K
Back
Top