Why Doesn't the Space Shuttle Deploy Its Wings During Reentry?

  • Thread starter mheslep
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Wings
In summary, the conversation discusses the idea of mechanically deploying the wings and vertical stabilizer of the shuttle during re-entry at lower mach numbers. The drawbacks of keeping the aerial control surfaces attached during ascent and high mach re-entry are mentioned, as well as the challenges of storing and deploying the surfaces in flight. The weight and space constraints, as well as potential failures, are also considered. However, the benefits of reducing drag and eliminating the need for a fragile, tile-based heat shield are discussed. Ultimately, the complexity and risk of implementing this idea are deemed too high, and it is decided that the shuttle needs its wings for re-entry.
  • #36
Right, that's why I specified ram-air rather than circular chutes like the military use (or the Mercury and Gemini capsules). But the scale of the thing is still somewhat daunting. As has been mentioned, the airfoil for the x-38 is referred to as the "largest in the world," and the one I linked to from paraflite is for 10-ton payloads, and will be the new record, I believe. Making one big enough to fly the Shuttle (minus its wings) is truly a new realm. I don't know if simply "scaling up" the current forms would function. But if it did, it would be lighter and cheaper than building the Shuttle with wings.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
I'm a bit confused. Will these ram-air chutes work to slow the shuttle from orbital velocity? The Mercury and Gemini capsules had a very large heat-shield surface compared to their size and mass, enough for aero-braking from orbit.

Without wings, the shuttle will be a very heavy missile moving at Mach 25.
 
  • #38
DaveC426913 said:
I'm a bit confused. Will these ram-air chutes work to slow the shuttle from orbital velocity? The Mercury and Gemini capsules had a very large heat-shield surface compared to their size and mass, enough for aero-braking from orbit.

Without wings, the shuttle will be a very heavy missile moving at Mach 25.
The idea proffered here was to use the old Apollo/Gemini style, but simple, large monolithic heat shield to brake from orbital velocity, perhaps jettison the shield, and then pop the chutes. I was thinking of some kind of large elliptical or rectilinear shape, a single piece that would be easy/cheap to construct, would not have to accommodate any complex or movable flight surfaces, and would not be exposed to debris strikes during ascent.
 

Similar threads

  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
22
Views
17K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • Poll
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • Sticky
  • Aerospace Engineering
2
Replies
48
Views
60K
Back
Top