Resolving Forces Homework: Pin Frame BCFGD

In summary: I got stuck. Isolate joint G to solve for the force in CG. It should bounce right out at you. What did you get for the force in DC?I got my reaction force at B as +20KN and at F -10KN. You mean the reaction force at B is -20 (acting left) and at F it is +10 (acting right), which you seem to have correctly noted below. I was struggling because once i had worked these out I found I had a -40kN force which needed to be taken by CG and CD and i couldn't get these to be in equilibrium at G and D. You are messing up your plus and minus signs. You must keep them straight, or
  • #1
geoffishere
5
0

Homework Statement


Hi guys, i hope this is posted in the right area, i have been struggling on the following question. Sorry about the diagram but i don't have a scanner

I have a pin frame BCFGD and need to resolve the forces. It is attached to a wall at B and F. There is a negative force of 20KN acting vertically at C and at D a positive force of 10KN acting horizontally.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I have worked out the following BC=20KN, CF=28.28KN, FG=10KN, CG=40KN GD=10KN

I think i am on the right line but I just can't get it to add up. I started by working out the forces at the supports which i got as 20KN for B and 10KN for F acting horizontally and a vertical force of 20KN acting at F.

Any help would be appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Geoffishere, welcome to PF!
Without a sketch, it's pretty tough for us to help. However, if you're not getting your numbers to add up, a likely cause might be in the incorrect use of plus and minus signs and incorrect directions for reaction forces. If you can't attach a sketch, perhaps you can describe the frame with words, giving dimensions between joints, angles, etc.
 
  • #3
Hi, thanks for your reply, i was struggling to attach the file last night. All horizontal and vertical lengths are 2m.
 

Attachments

  • frame.bmp
    219.8 KB · Views: 443
  • #4
The attachment won't work for me. Are you using method of joints of sections to try and solve the problem?
 
  • #5
I think i am usin joints of sections. I will try and discribe the frame if the attachment isn't working. Starting at B, it is attached to wall by a hinge on a roller. from this is a horizontal bar joining to C. From C are three further bars one vertically down to G, one going south west to F and one going south east to D. D and G are attached horizontally as are FG. F is attached to the wall by a hinge.

All angles are 45 or 90 and all horizontal and vertical lengths are 2m. The forces are acting at C, -20KN vertically and at D +10KN horizontally
 
  • #6
I was able to open your attachment. Be sure to specify the direction of the reaction forces, and the direction of the member forces (compression or tension). Otherwise, you have an error in the value of CG, and it's probably because you got careless with your signage at joint C. Isolate joint G to solve for the force in CG. It should bounce right out at you. What did you get for the force in DC?
 
  • #7
I got my reaction force at B as +20KN and at F -10KN. I was struggling because once i had worked these out I found I had a -40kN force which needed to be taken by CG and CD and i couldn't get these to be in equilibrium at G and D.

I think it must be something wrong with what i am doing. I will try and explain what my thinking is.

Firstly because of the -20KN force at C, I deduced there must be a reactant force of +20KN acting vertically at F. I the deduced that the moments at B and F are 20Knm however because of the 10KN force at D and to keep everything in equilibrium, F is +10Kn and B -20KN.

I then used equilibrium of joints to try and work out the rest and that's where i got stuck
 
  • #8
geoffishere said:
I got my reaction force at B as +20KN and at F -10KN.
You mean the reaction force at B is -20 (acting left) and at F it is +10 (acting right), which you seem to have correctly noted below.
I was struggling because once i had worked these out I found I had a -40kN force which needed to be taken by CG and CD and i couldn't get these to be in equilibrium at G and D.
You are messing up your plus and minus signs. You must keep them straight, or else you'll be scratching your head forever. At Joint C, BC exerts a horizontal force of 20 to the left, and the horizontal component of FC acting on joint C is 20 to the right. They cancel, not add.
I think it must be something wrong with what i am doing. I will try and explain what my thinking is.

Firstly because of the -20KN force at C, I deduced there must be a reactant force of +20KN acting vertically at F. I the deduced that the moments at B and F are 20Knm however because of the 10KN force at D and to keep everything in equilibrium, F is +10Kn and B -20KN.
This result is correct.
I then used equilibrium of joints to try and work out the rest and that's where i got stuck
Mind your plus and minus signs, they can wear you down.
 
  • #9
I think i get it in equilibrium, but CG and CD are zero, is this right?
 
  • #10
geoffishere said:
I think i get it in equilibrium, but CG and CD are zero, is this right?
Yes, correct, they are both zero. I think you've licked it now.
 

1. What is a pin frame in resolving forces?

A pin frame, also known as a pin joint or a hinge joint, is a type of connection between two or more bodies that allows for rotation but restricts translation. In resolving forces, this refers to the point where two or more forces are acting on a body and are balanced, resulting in no net force at that point.

2. How do you determine the magnitude and direction of a force in a pin frame?

To determine the magnitude and direction of a force in a pin frame, you will need to use trigonometric principles such as the law of sines and cosines. First, draw a free body diagram of the pin frame, including the forces acting on it. Then, use the equations for equilibrium to find the unknown forces. The magnitude of the force can be found using the Pythagorean theorem, and the direction can be determined using the tangent function.

3. What is the difference between a pin frame and a fixed frame in resolving forces?

In a fixed frame, the connection between two or more bodies allows for both rotation and translation, meaning that the bodies can move freely in any direction. In contrast, a pin frame restricts translation and only allows for rotation. This difference affects the calculations and equations used in resolving forces.

4. Can a pin frame be in static equilibrium?

Yes, a pin frame can be in static equilibrium if the forces acting on it are balanced. This means that the net force and net torque at the pin frame must be equal to zero. If these conditions are met, the pin frame will not experience any linear or angular acceleration and will remain in a state of rest or constant motion.

5. What are some real-world examples of a pin frame?

A real-world example of a pin frame can be seen in the hinges of a door. The hinge restricts the door's movement to only rotation, allowing it to open and close without moving away from the frame. Another example is a seesaw, where the pivot point acts as a pin frame, allowing for only rotation and balancing the forces on either side.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
521
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
39
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
925
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
865
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
952
Back
Top