Angled light path in moving clock

In summary, the light clock works because the photon moves at a constant speed and at the same time horizontally along x. If the photon doesn't acquire the speed of the clock, it must move at an angle relative to the vertical.
  • #1
phyti
452
8
1. Ann's light clock uses a single photon that oscillates vertically between two mirrors separated by a distance d. She leaves the space station, accelerates to a constant .2c in a random direction labeled x.
For her clock to continue working, the photon must move vertically as before, and simultaneoulsly horizontally along x. If the photon does not acquire the speed of the clock, it must move at an angle relative to the vertical. What causes the angular orientation?

2. Assume the same scenario except the upper mirror is moved vertically to a separation of d/2. Does the clock still work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If Ann remains still, an observer moving past at any velocity such as 0.2c will see her clock continue to work properly. The photon's velocity will appear to have a sideways component just as the mirrors in the clock do also.

However if you are serious that Ann accelerates, she must push her clock along with her. She will push the mirrors and they will accelerate, but there is nothing to push the photon and it will fall off the edge.
 
  • #3
Bill_K said:
If Ann remains still, an observer moving past at any velocity such as 0.2c will see her clock continue to work properly. The photon's velocity will appear to have a sideways component just as the mirrors in the clock do also.

However if you are serious that Ann accelerates, she must push her clock along with her. She will push the mirrors and they will accelerate, but there is nothing to push the photon and it will fall off the edge.

We know an observer moving past the clock cannot affect the operation of the clock, and only perceives/interprets his motion as belonging to the clock.
If the clock only works for a specific speed, i.e. in the frame where it was constructed, this would seem to disagree with the 1st postulate.

This also relates to the laser pointed toward the ceiling of a moving capsule.
Does it work for an observer moving at various speeds?
 
  • #4
phyti said:
This also relates to the laser pointed toward the ceiling of a moving capsule.
Does it work for an observer moving at various speeds?
It works for observers moving at various speeds. It doesn't necessarily work for accelerating observers.
 
  • #5
zonde said:
It works for observers moving at various speeds. It doesn't necessarily work for accelerating observers.

Thanks for that.
I'm only considering constant speeds.
This is based on the speed of light being constant and independent of the source. If either device, light clock or laser, moves to the right, the original vertical beam must move to the right to function correctly. The goal is to explain how the light signal acquires the necessary angle to intercept the moving mirror or ceiling that is vertical relative to the observer moving with the device. I've never seen an explanation for this.
 
  • #6
phyti said:
The goal is to explain how the light signal acquires the necessary angle to intercept the moving mirror or ceiling that is vertical relative to the observer moving with the device. I've never seen an explanation for this.
Stationary laser functions differently than similar laser that is in motion. If stationary laser emits light vertically then similar horizontally moving laser emits light at an angle to vertical. This is related to aberration. Only aberration usually describe observer effect but the same way it applies to source.
 
  • #7
zonde said:
Stationary laser functions differently than similar laser that is in motion. If stationary laser emits light vertically then similar horizontally moving laser emits light at an angle to vertical. This is related to aberration. Only aberration usually describe observer effect but the same way it applies to source.
Aberration has to do with a source and emitter that are moving relative to each other which is not the case with a light clock.
 
  • #8
phyti said:
Thanks for that.
I'm only considering constant speeds.
This is based on the speed of light being constant and independent of the source. If either device, light clock or laser, moves to the right, the original vertical beam must move to the right to function correctly. The goal is to explain how the light signal acquires the necessary angle to intercept the moving mirror or ceiling that is vertical relative to the observer moving with the device. I've never seen an explanation for this.
This question was considered in this thread, but not to the OP's satisfaction.
 
  • #9
Aberration has to do with a source and emitter that are moving relative to each other which is not the case with a light clock.
Aberration is the change in direction of the wave vector when going from one frame to another, and is the correct explanation for the light clock.
 
  • #10
phyti said:
The goal is to explain how the light signal acquires the necessary angle to intercept the moving mirror or ceiling that is vertical relative to the observer moving with the device. I've never seen an explanation for this.

That follows from momentum conversation in the electromagnetic field. Light rays or photons have momentum p=E/c, so their direction (not their speed) is affected by the motion of the source. That is, if the photons are sent upwards in a straight line (in the comoving frame), then the rays or photons automatically are moving to the right in a frame where the light source is moving to the right, in accordance with aberration.

This is equivalent to the transverse light path of the Michelson-Morley experiment, where one also expects an inclined path to the right due to momentum conservation (in the aether frame). See the lower image at Wikipedia/Michelson-Morley. There you can see how photons gain momentum and thus direction from the source, without changing the photon's speed. If you transform back into the MMX frame, the path becomes a straight line in transverse direction again.
 
  • #11
phyti said:
The goal is to explain how the light signal acquires the necessary angle to intercept the moving mirror or ceiling that is vertical relative to the observer moving with the device. I've never seen an explanation for this.

Not in contradiction with the explanations you have received, but as a development of the details, the mechanics of the process, you may want to look at the reasoning I give in this Blog entry. The matter puzzled me at the beginning as well. There are recurrent questions about it. And in that Blog entry I tried to provide a didactic explanation, which I think is in line with what everybody has in mind, I just try to make it clearer.
 
  • #12
Thanks for all responses.
Histspec's is consistent with the mass-energy equivalence which affects the light path near a massive object as verified in the 1919 experiment. This is also my basic understanding from reading Max Born's explanation in his book on Relativity.
Having read Feymann's book on light propagation, I also leave room for revisions!
 

1. What is an angled light path in a moving clock?

An angled light path in a moving clock refers to the path that light takes when it travels through a clock that is in motion. This path is affected by the relative motion between the observer and the clock, and can result in differences in the observed time compared to the actual time on the clock.

2. How does the angled light path affect the measurement of time in a moving clock?

The angled light path can result in time dilation, which means that time appears to pass slower for a moving clock compared to a stationary clock. This is due to the fact that the light has to travel a longer distance in a moving clock, resulting in a longer perceived time interval.

3. What is the significance of the angled light path in relation to Einstein's theory of relativity?

The angled light path is a crucial aspect of Einstein's theory of relativity, as it explains the phenomenon of time dilation and how time can appear to pass differently for observers in different frames of reference. It also helps to reconcile the concept of absolute time with the concept of relative motion.

4. How is the angled light path in a moving clock measured?

The angled light path can be measured using a variety of methods, such as the use of high-speed clocks and precise measurement tools. One common method is the use of the Michelson-Morley experiment, which measures the speed of light in different directions to determine any deviations caused by the angled light path.

5. Are there any practical applications of understanding the angled light path in a moving clock?

Yes, there are several practical applications of understanding the angled light path in a moving clock, including the use of time dilation in GPS systems to account for the differences in time caused by the movement of satellites. This understanding also has implications for space travel and the development of accurate timekeeping devices.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
5
Replies
146
Views
6K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
89
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
44
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
62
Views
5K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
18
Views
1K
Back
Top