Moving Faster Than the Speed of Light? Exploring the Possibilities

In summary, according to Special Relativity, the speed of light is invariant, so a person traveling at 80% of the speed of light within a spaceship would be moving faster than the speed of light outside the spaceship. This is why it is incorrect to think that speeds add like this: V_{a/c} = V_{a/b} + V_{b/c}. The first approximation, Galilean addition of velocities, is only accurate for low speeds, and the second, relativistic addition of velocities, is more accurate.
  • #1
Pineapple
1
0
I know that according to e=mc^2, it should be impossible to accelerate anything with mass to the speed of light, but what if someone is on a large spaceship moving at 80% of c, and are themselves moving at, say 20 or 30% of the speed of light within the spaceship.

According to an immobile observer, outside the spaceship wouldn't this person be moving faster than the speed of light?

Of course I know this must be wrong, but I'm wondering what the flaw in my reasoning is.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Your question isn't naive. Your error is thinking that speeds add like this:

[tex]V_{a/c} = V_{a/b} + V_{b/c}[/tex]

When they really add like this:

[tex]V_{a/c} = \frac{V_{a/b} + V_{b/c}}{1 + (V_{a/b} V_{b/c})/c^2}[/tex]

The first (called Galilean addition of velocities) is only an approximation good for low speeds; the second is the more accurate relativistic addition of velocities. You'll see that speeds will never add to more than c.
 
  • #3
Pineapple said:
I know that according to e=mc^2, it should be impossible to accelerate anything with mass to the speed of light, but what if someone is on a large spaceship moving at 80% of c, and are themselves moving at, say 20 or 30% of the speed of light within the spaceship.

According to an immobile observer, outside the spaceship wouldn't this person be moving faster than the speed of light?

Of course I know this must be wrong, but I'm wondering what the flaw in my reasoning is.

This is sort of a reformulation of the classic "light flash" thought experments. No matter how you slice it, the speed of light in a given medium is STATIC. I would reach about the basics of Special Relativity, which basically takes the conundrum you're struggling with, and solves it.

This is WHY things are relative, because c is invariant. If c is the same everywhere, and if all observers have to "agree on the laws of physics", then it's SPACETIME which varies. This is how you get to Relativity in the first place.

If you hold a flashlight, and walk forward... the velocity of your motion is not added to the velocity of the light. The interval between the light reaching X target is a function of the medium and distance (geodesic followed).

EDIt: Doc Al beat me to, and probably for the best. Sorry Doc!
 

1. What is the speed of light?

The speed of light is a fundamental constant in physics, denoted by the letter 'c'. In a vacuum, its value is approximately 299,792,458 meters per second. This speed is considered to be the maximum attainable speed in the universe.

2. Can anything travel faster than the speed of light?

According to the current understanding of physics, nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. This is based on Einstein's theory of special relativity, which states that as an object approaches the speed of light, its mass increases infinitely and it would require infinite energy to accelerate further.

3. What would happen if something did travel faster than the speed of light?

If something were to travel faster than the speed of light, it would violate the laws of physics as we know them. It would also have some strange effects, such as time appearing to move backwards and the object's mass becoming imaginary.

4. Is there any evidence of objects moving faster than the speed of light?

No, there is currently no evidence of anything moving faster than the speed of light. Many experiments and observations have been conducted to test this, and so far, they have all confirmed the speed of light as the ultimate speed limit in the universe.

5. Are there any theories or possibilities for faster-than-light travel?

While there is currently no scientific evidence to support faster-than-light travel, some theoretical concepts, such as wormholes and warp drive, have been proposed. However, these are still highly speculative and require further research and understanding of physics to be possible.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
65
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
647
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
19
Views
1K
Back
Top