Scattering field formulation used in DGFEMby discworld Tags: dgfem, field, formulation, scattering 

#1
Apr2913, 05:35 AM

P: 1

Hello!
Reading up on simulations of electromagnetic scattering with DGFEM and trying some myself, I got stuck. In some of papers I have read, a scattering field formulation is used, in which the total field is linearly decomposed in incident field and scattering field: [itex] E^{T}=E^{S}+E^{I}[/itex] And, the 2D equations for the scattering field in a lossless, isotropic medium are: [itex] \epsilon_{r} \frac{\partial E^{S}}{\partial t} = \nabla \times H^{S}  (\epsilon_{r}  \epsilon_{r}^{I}) \frac{\partial E^{i}}{\partial t} [/itex] [itex] \mu_{r} \frac{\partial H^{S}}{\partial t} = \nabla \times E^{S}  (\mu_{r}  \mu_{r}^{I}) \frac{\partial H^{i}}{\partial t} [/itex] My problem is in the interpretation of the "scattering field" and "incident field" in this context. In every use I see of this formulation [itex]\epsilon_{r}[/itex] is space dependent, while [itex]\epsilon_{r}^{I}[/itex] is a constant  specifically, the incident medium's permittivity (same for the permeability). How can this work for multisubstrate cases, where, if I am thinking correctly, the medium considered incident should change? (I am quite confused with the affair in general, so any clarifications are quite welcome) 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Hamiltonian formulation of *classical* field theory  Classical Physics  7  
Magnetic field formulation!  Classical Physics  1  
Scattering of Waves Formulation (moved to correct forum)  Calculus & Beyond Homework  0  
Scattering of Waves Formulation  Precalculus Mathematics Homework  0  
Equivalence between path integral formulation and matrix formulation  Quantum Physics  1 