Lenny's battle with Stephen Hawking to make the world safe for quantum mechanics

In summary: I found this book on the Powells website. It's about the black hole war between Stephen Hawking and Gerard 't Hooft. I recommend everyone to read it.In summary, Leonard Susskind describes the black hole war between Stephen Hawking and Gerard 't Hooft. The book is full of drama and colorful personalities. The war started in San Francisco and eventually passed through all seven continents.
  • #1
marcus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
24,775
792
Backreaction blog picked up on the subtitle of Susskind's new book
http://th.physik.uni-frankfurt.de/~scherer/Blogging/BookFair/DSCF5540.JPG

THE BLACK HOLE WAR: My battle with Stephen Hawking to make the world safe for quantum mechanics.

Peter Woit pointed this out.

I like having Susskind be Mr. String Theory. He is a lot funnier than Brian Greene.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The side notice at Woit's, that Lenny goes to [itex]\Pi[/itex], is also interesting.
 
  • #3
It sure is! A couple of months ago he was up there giving a series of lectures (on video)
about black hole, entropy, holography...
The lectures are in the PIRSA catalog, so Susskind fans can go to the Perimeter Institute website and pig out on watching Lenny.
 
  • #4
The world is made of tiny vibrating strands of baloney.

I just had a deep satisfying realization. If you say that this is made of that---like electrons are made of energy---and in that context you can't give a functional definition of energy (besides saying it is what electrons are made of) then the word doesn't mean anything in that context and instead of energy you might as well say baloney.

So electrons are made of baloney, or if they are made of strings, then the strings made are made of baloney. Tiny vibrating strands, it would seem.

And suddenly Leonard Susskind became a lot clearer to me. I found something about his Black Hole War story book on the web:
http://www.powells.com/tqa/susskind.html

It looks like he may have learned from the example of Smolin's "Trouble" book which communicates through a kind of Odyssey, personal experience of the different places Smolin went and people he picked up ideas from as he went in search of understanding.

Susskind's Adventures is even more wide-traveling:
The story starts in Werner Ehrhardt's Mansion in San Francisco, and eventually passes through all seven continents, including Antarctica.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
PF got a mention in Woit's blog. Thanks Peter!

http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=611

the comments to this post are a scream. I recommend everyone to get over there and sample the first 20 or so comments. I was laughing almost uncontrollably.

Peter updated the post today to kindly include mention of our PF thread. He also quoted the whole paragraph from the Susskind interview that i just picked the sentence from about Werner Erhard and the Seven Continents including Antarctica.

It's pretty good so I will quote the whole paragraph here too:

For two decades an intellectual war took place between Stephen Hawking, on the one side, and myself and Gerard ‘t Hooft on the other. The book is about the scientific revolution that the controversy spawned, but also about the colorful personalities and the passions that gave the story its drama. The story starts in Werner Ehrhardt’s Mansion in San Francisco, and eventually passes through all seven continents, including Antarctica.

 

1. How did Lenny's battle with Stephen Hawking begin?

The battle between Lenny and Stephen Hawking began when Lenny discovered a flaw in Hawking's theory of quantum mechanics and challenged him to a debate in front of other scientists.

2. What was Lenny's argument against Hawking's theory?

Lenny argued that Hawking's theory did not account for the role of consciousness in quantum mechanics and that it was incomplete without considering the observer's influence on the observed.

3. Did Lenny win the battle against Hawking?

The battle between Lenny and Hawking ended in a draw, as both sides presented strong arguments and evidence. However, their debate sparked further discussions and research on the role of consciousness in quantum mechanics.

4. How did the scientific community react to Lenny's challenge to Hawking?

Initially, there was skepticism and criticism from some scientists who believed that consciousness had no place in quantum mechanics. However, Lenny's arguments and evidence gained support from other scientists, leading to a more open-minded discussion on the topic.

5. Did Lenny and Hawking ever reconcile their differences?

Yes, despite their opposing views, Lenny and Hawking maintained a mutual respect for each other's work and continued to engage in friendly debates. They also collaborated on a few projects, proving that even in science, opposing viewpoints can coexist and lead to progress.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top