Fusion Propulsion Concept

In summary, the conversation discusses a setup for fusion technology where horizontal tori and vertical pipes are used to create magnetic fields for plasma confinement. The direction and intensity of these fields can be controlled by adjusting the number of pipes and distance between the tori and pipes. This setup has the potential to be more energy efficient and may also stabilize the plasma in the vertical direction. However, it would need to be further researched and discussed with experts in the field to determine its feasibility.
  • #1
tomkeus
77
0
I came up with this during idle afternoon. Don't know if it's worth something but I wanted to discuss it with someone. Basically, outline of business part is given on the picture

attachment.php?attachmentid=19176&stc=1&d=1243872414.jpg


Horizontal tori are basically tokamaks and vertical pipes are "fusion combustion chambers" where working fluid is heated and ionized by fusion then directed downward to nozzles. Inner and outer tokamaks create magnetic field directed along vertical pipes , let's call it [tex]\vec{B}_v[/tex], and vertical pipes generate magnetic field approximately tangential to tokamaks, let's call this one [tex]\vec{B}_t[/tex]. Purpose of [tex]\vec{B}_v[/tex] is plasma confinement in tokamaks while purpose of [tex]\vec{B}_t[/tex] is plasma confinement in vertical pipes.

Now, [tex]\vec{B}_t[/tex] is not perfectly tangential to tokamaks. Rather it's direction deviates from tangent for some angle [tex]\Delta\alpha[/tex] and it's intensity varies from average value on a torus by [tex]\Delta B_t[/tex]. Both [tex]\Delta\alpha[/tex] and[tex]\Delta B_t[/tex] are periodic functions along tokamak length. By increasing number of vertical pipes both [tex]\Delta\alpha[/tex] and [tex]\Delta B_t[/tex] get smaller, while they get bigger when distance between tori and pipes is decreased. As for intensity of vertical field along pipes, [tex]B_v[/tex] it also has periodic deviations.

One advantage of setup like this (if it could work) is that it doesn't require separate magnets for confinement in tokamaks because tangential field is provided by ionized working fluid rushing out. We only have to provide magnets that create poloidal fields. This also makes tokamaks more energy efficient.

Now, question is whether these deviations could be reduced enough by using appropriate number of toruses and pipes at appropriate distance, so that instabilities doesn't destroy confinement and fusion.
 

Attachments

  • machine.JPG
    machine.JPG
    40.4 KB · Views: 571
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Actually, I just had another idea.

The fact that direction of magnetic field produced by vertical pipes deviates from tangential direction, and the fact that deviations are periodical along the length of the tokamaks might stabilize tokamak plasma in vertical direction because particle trajectories in tokamak will wiggle around in normal direction which will in combination with field produced by tokamaks provide force in vertical direction whose direction will change periodically along tokamak.
 
  • #3
Thank you for sharing your idea! It sounds like an interesting concept and I can see how it could potentially be more energy efficient. However, I am not an expert in this field so I cannot say for certain if it could work or not. Have you discussed this with any experts in fusion technology? It may be worth reaching out to them to get their thoughts and feedback on your idea. It's always great to bounce ideas off of others and get different perspectives.
 

1. What is a Fusion Propulsion Concept?

A Fusion Propulsion Concept is a theoretical method of using nuclear fusion reactions to generate thrust and propel a spacecraft through space.

2. How does Fusion Propulsion work?

In a fusion propulsion system, hydrogen atoms are heated to extremely high temperatures and pressures, causing them to fuse together and release large amounts of energy. This energy is then directed out of the back of the spacecraft, creating thrust.

3. What are the advantages of Fusion Propulsion over traditional rocket engines?

Fusion Propulsion has the potential to provide much higher speeds and efficiency than traditional rocket engines. It also uses a nearly inexhaustible fuel source and produces less radioactive waste.

4. What are the current challenges in developing Fusion Propulsion technology?

One of the main challenges in developing Fusion Propulsion is finding a way to sustain and control the fusion reaction for long periods of time. Additionally, the technology is still in the early stages of development and requires significant investment and research.

5. When could we see Fusion Propulsion being used in space travel?

It is difficult to predict when Fusion Propulsion will be used in space travel, as it is still in the early stages of development. However, some experts estimate that it could be feasible within the next several decades with significant advancements in technology.

Similar threads

  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
28
Views
26K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top