Calculating Separation Increase: 2000km Space Drop

In summary, the conversation discusses the problem of calculating the time it takes for the separation between two balls, dropped in a spaceship at 2000km above the surface of the Earth, to increase from 1m to 1.01m. The hint suggests calculating the relative acceleration between the balls and using a first-order approximation. The formula for relative acceleration is given, and it is recommended to use calculus for its calculation. The next step is to find the time needed for the relative acceleration to produce a difference in distance of 0.01m, which can be done by using the formula s = (1/2)at^2.
  • #1
roz77
16
0
There is a spaceship in low-earth orbit, at 2000km above the surface of the earth. There are two balls in the spaceship that are dropped. The balls are 1m apart. How long will it take for their separation to increase to 1.01m? Assume that one ball is at 2000km, and the other is at 2000km+1m.

So the hint that we are given is to calculate the relative acceleration between the balls. Then we need to realize that this relative acceleration is right along the radial line passing through them and the center of the Earth. Also, do feel free to make first-order approximations!

So I did what the hint said. I calculated the acceleration of the ball at 2000km as 5.683936914 m/s^2. I then calculated the acceleration of the ball at 2000km+1m as 5.683935556 m/s^2. So the relative acceleration is 1.358 x10-6 m/s^2. That's great and all, except I have no idea what to do now. Suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If you know calculus, you can find the relative acceleration by using the formula

[tex] a(r + dr) - a(r) = \frac{d}{dr}a(r)dr [/tex]

Where a(r) is the acceleration due to the Earth at distance r, and dr is the distance between the two balls (1 m in this case). This is a reasonable thing to do because 1m is very small compared to 2000km, and the rate at which a(r) changes over such small distances is approximately constant (i.e. is of first order in r)

Once you know the relative acceleration, you have to find out the time needed for this acceleration to produce a difference in distance of 0.01m. (Hint: do you recognize this formula: [tex]s = (1/2)at^2[/tex]?).
 

What is "Calculating Separation Increase: 2000km Space Drop"?

"Calculating Separation Increase: 2000km Space Drop" is a scientific process used to determine the distance between two objects in space after one object has been dropped from a height of 2000km.

Why is calculating separation increase important?

Calculating separation increase is important for understanding the effects of gravity and orbital dynamics in space. It can also be used for planning and predicting the trajectory of objects in space.

What factors are involved in calculating separation increase?

The factors involved in calculating separation increase include the initial height of the dropped object, the gravitational force of the larger object, and the velocity of the dropped object.

How is calculating separation increase performed?

To perform a calculation of separation increase, the initial distance between the two objects is measured, along with the initial velocity of the dropped object. Then, using equations of motion and principles of gravity, the final distance between the two objects can be determined.

What are some real-life applications of calculating separation increase?

Calculating separation increase has many real-life applications, such as predicting the trajectory of satellites and spacecraft, understanding orbital dynamics, and planning space missions. It is also used in astronomy to study the movements of celestial bodies.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
38
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Classical Physics
2
Replies
64
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
34
Views
685
Replies
3
Views
652
Replies
1
Views
782
Replies
18
Views
966
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
29
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
7
Views
715
Back
Top