New Scientist: What's Your Take?

  • Thread starter Alkatran
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses various topics related to science and the universe, including the placebo effect, the Big Bang theory, cosmic rays, dark matter, Martians, tetraneutrons, the Pioneer anomaly, and the Wow signal. The participants express their opinions and thoughts on these subjects, with some skepticism towards certain claims. The conversation ends with a humorous comment about homeopathy and the absurdity of buying water as medicine.
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
#1. Placebo effect - Just when do they consider it something that 'Makes sense'? The placebo effect is well understood, it's understood in how it is created, how it develops, and what the subject feels in the end. It's not like we're in the dark about it. If we call this "not making sense", there are many many things that do not make sense.

#2. Big Bang - It's the big bang. It was created a long long time ago, and quite simply has no place in a modern factual discussion of the universe. At least as far as I know. Also, does this not imply that the "Big Bang" is an explosion of matter, rather than an explosion of spacetime?

#3. Cosmic Rays Wrong - So what? No real scientist and realist will ever tell you that einstein is completely correct in anything, or that any theory is, or that any results are perfect.

#5. Dark Matter - Doesn't completely make sense, and doesn't completely not. No, we can't describe everything in the universe. Oh no!

#6. Martians, Martians, Martians! - Cool. Good to know.

#7. Tetraneutrons - Sounds interesting, but still has a high probability of being a flop.

#8. Pioneer - I think Nieto is right, it probably is some mundane effect.

I'm going to bed now. Goodnight.

EDIT: Whoop, had to come back for #11. This quote should be signatured or at least put in some archive of stupid things on the internet:

The nearest star in that direction is 220 light years away. If that is where is came from, it would have had to be a pretty powerful astronomical event - or an advanced alien civilisation using an astonishingly large and powerful transmitter.

Others think there must be a mundane explanation. Dan Wertheimer, chief scientist for the SETI@home project, says the Wow signal was almost certainly pollution: radio-frequency interference from Earth-based transmissions. "We've seen many signals like this, and these sorts of signals have always turned out to be interference," he says.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
I was mainly suspicious of the homeopathy one. I've seen homeopathic descriptions "waves propagating in the water" ETC... it makes no sense. I mean you can make billions upon billions upon billions of tons of a homeopathic remedy from a gram of (whatever). The more dilute it is the better! ?

It occurs to me that people are ACTUALLY BUYING WATER AS A MEDECINE.
 
  • #4
Yes, that's kind of weird. I'm surprised more people haven't replied to this thread, it kinda belongs in the general discussion, and it kinda belongs here.
 

1. What is "New Scientist: What's Your Take?"

"New Scientist: What's Your Take?" is a feature on the New Scientist website that allows readers to share their opinions and perspectives on various scientific topics and articles.

2. How can I submit my take on a topic?

To submit your take, you can click on the "What's Your Take?" button on the New Scientist website and fill out the submission form. You can also submit your take through social media using the hashtag #NSWhatsYourTake.

3. Can anyone submit their take or do I need to be a scientist?

Anyone can submit their take on "New Scientist: What's Your Take?" You do not need to be a scientist or have a scientific background. As long as your take is respectful and relevant to the topic, it will be considered for publication.

4. Will my take be edited before being published?

Yes, the editorial team at New Scientist will review and edit your take before publishing it. They may make minor changes for clarity or to adhere to their style guidelines, but they will not change the overall message or tone of your submission.

5. How can I read other people's takes on a topic?

You can read other people's takes by clicking on the "What's Your Take?" button on the New Scientist website and selecting a topic from the drop-down menu. You can also browse through the hashtag #NSWhatsYourTake on social media platforms to see other submissions.

Similar threads

  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
4
Views
16K
  • STEM Educators and Teaching
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
35
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
7
Views
14K
Replies
3
Views
87
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
59
Back
Top