Two precession rates for a spinning top (forced precession)

In summary, when a spinning top undergoes forced precession, it can exhibit two precession rates due to the quadratic equation governing its steady-state precession. The slower precession rate is typically observed as it requires less energy, while the higher precession rate can occur but is short-lived due to its higher energy state. This phenomenon is similar to the stable states of a pendulum.
  • #1
garygary
2
0
When you have a spinning top undergoing forced precession (due to the torque created by its weight trying to tip it), you seem to get two precession rates. Why?

I get this result from using Euler's equations, specifically that the sum of moments tipping the top is (in the case of steady precession):

[tex]\sum[/tex] M0 = [tex]\psi[/tex]' sin([tex]\theta[/tex]) (I ([tex]\psi[/tex]' cos([tex]\theta[/tex]) + p) - I0 [tex]\psi[/tex]' cos([tex]\theta[/tex]))

Where:
[tex]\psi[/tex]' = angular velocity of precession
I = mass moment of inertia of top about spin axis
I0 = mass moment of inertia of top about transverse axis
p = angular velocity of top about its spin axis, its spin
[tex]\theta[/tex] = angle of precession

The only moment acting on the top is its weight, which can be written as:
mgl sin([tex]\theta[/tex])

Where:
m = mass of top
g = gravity
l = distance from tipping axis to centre of mass of the top

This gives me the quadratic equation:

0 = ([tex]\psi[/tex]')2 cos([tex]\theta[/tex]) (I - I0) + I p [tex]\psi[/tex]' - lmg

Which when solved for [tex]\psi[/tex]' gives two precession rates. Which one will the top actually precess at, and why? One precession rate is much smaller than the other. If instead of a top it is a cylindrical shape, with I0>I, both precession rates have the same sign. I'm having trouble working out exactly what this means in reality. So the top can precess stably at both of these precession rates? What makes it go at one rate rather than the other?

In most other examples I can find it is typically assumed that the precession rate is much less than the spin rate, so the squared term of the quadratic is ignored and you only get one answer. This answer is always closest to the larger precession rate that I find above.

This is my first post, so hopefully you can understand my technique and exactly what I'm asking, any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
garygary said:
When you have a spinning top undergoing forced precession (due to the torque created by its weight trying to tip it), you seem to get two precession rates. Why?

I get this result from using Euler's equations [...]


I wonder whether the two rates you are getting are for precession rate and nutation rate respectively.

Nutation rate is always faster than precession rate. As you refer to, when the spin rate is not much faster than the precession rate things get critical.

The most informative discussion of nutation that I know of is in two articles by Eugene Butikov.
http://faculty.ifmo.ru/butikov/Applets/Precession.html" [Broken]
http://faculty.ifmo.ru/butikov/Applets/Gyroscope.html" [Broken]

And possibly the article about http://www.cleonis.nl/physics/phys256/gyroscope_physics.php" [Broken] on my own website will be helpful to you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
Cleonis said:
I wonder whether the two rates you are getting are for precession rate and nutation rate respectively.
The two rates are for steady-state precession. In other words, no nutation is present. The physics of gyroscopic precession is covered in detail in most undergrad classical mechanics texts. The reason you get two precession rates is because the equation for the steady-state precession is a quadratic.

It is usually the slow rate that is observed.
 
  • #4
garygary said:
In most other examples I can find it is typically assumed that the precession rate is much less than the spin rate, so the squared term of the quadratic is ignored and you only get one answer. This answer is always closest to the larger precession rate that I find above.
Dropping the quadratic term yields the smaller precession rate, not the larger one.

Consider the quadratic equation

[tex]ax^2 - bx + c = 0,\quad a,b,c>0[/tex]

This obviously has two solutions given by

[tex]x=\frac{b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a} = \frac{b}{2a}\left(1\pm\sqrt{1-\frac{4ac}{b^2}}\right)[/tex]

When [itex]b^2\gg 4ac[/itex], the radical can be expanded to yield two solutions,

[tex]\begin{aligned}
x_+ = \frac{b}{2a}\left(1+\sqrt{1-\frac{4ac}{b^2}}\right) \approx \frac b a \\[10pt]
x_- = \frac{b}{2a}\left(1-\sqrt{1-\frac{4ac}{b^2}}\right) \approx \frac c b
\end{aligned}[/tex]

Since [itex]b^2\gg 4ac[/itex], [itex]x_+\gg x_-[/itex].

Another way to look at this: The [itex]x_+[/itex] solution results from ignoring the constant term in the quadratic, leaving [itex](ax-b)x = 0[/itex]. The [itex]x_-[/itex] solution results from ignoring that quadratic term, leaving [itex]-bx+c = 0[/itex].
 
  • #5
D H said:
Dropping the quadratic term yields the smaller precession rate, not the larger one.

Yes you're right, I'd made a mistake when calculating it before. And yes, both the rates I get are definitely precession rates.

I asked one of my lecturers about this problem today, and he explained it all to me. Both precession rates exist, and the top can stably precess at either one of them. The difference is however in the energies of both states. The higher precession rate requires significantly more energy in the system, and as such it rarely exists. If it does occur, any damping will reduce its energy and it will try to switch to the lower energy state, with the slower precession rate.

If you imagine a pendulum say, it also has two stable states. The lowest energy stable state is with the pendulum pointing directly down, but it can also be stable with the pendulum perfectly balanced and pointing up. If there is any disturbance the system will try to switch from the high energy state to the lower energy state, ie; the pendulum will unbalance and try to point directly down. A similar thing occurs for the top apparently, which is why the higher precession rate rarely occurs and when it does it is short lived.
 

1. What is precession in a spinning top?

Precession is the phenomenon in which the axis of rotation of a spinning object gradually changes direction. In the case of a spinning top, it refers to the gradual change in the direction of the top's rotation.

2. What are the two precession rates for a spinning top?

The two precession rates for a spinning top are the natural precession rate and the forced precession rate. The natural precession rate is the rate at which the top would precess without any external forces acting on it. The forced precession rate is the rate at which the top precesses when an external force, such as a hand or string, is applied to it.

3. What factors affect the precession rates of a spinning top?

The precession rates of a spinning top can be affected by various factors such as the shape and weight distribution of the top, the force applied to it, and the surface on which it is spinning. These factors can impact the stability and direction of the top's rotation, thus affecting its precession rates.

4. How does the precession of a spinning top relate to its center of mass?

The precession of a spinning top is closely related to its center of mass. The center of mass of a top determines its stability and is the point around which the top rotates. As the center of mass shifts, the precession rates of the top may also change.

5. Can the precession rates of a spinning top be controlled?

Yes, the precession rates of a spinning top can be controlled to some extent. By adjusting the force applied to the top or changing the surface on which it is spinning, the precession rates can be altered. However, the natural precession rate of a top is largely determined by its physical characteristics and cannot be changed.

Similar threads

  • Classical Physics
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
1
Views
690
Replies
3
Views
651
  • Classical Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
5
Views
979
  • Classical Physics
Replies
2
Views
856
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
7
Views
919
  • Classical Physics
Replies
1
Views
579
  • Classical Physics
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
33
Views
875
Back
Top