Incest. Does it really produce retards?

  • Thread starter pikapika!
  • Start date
In summary, incest can increase the chances of rare recessive traits appearing in offspring, such as deformations or genetic disorders. This is because when closely related individuals mate, there is a higher chance of both parents carrying the same recessive allele. However, being colorblind, which is often considered a genetic weakness, may also have its advantages, such as better night vision and the ability to detect camouflage. The term "colorblind" is also misleading as it does not mean a complete inability to see color, but rather difficulty distinguishing between certain shades. Labels such as "retard" or "mentally challenged" are now considered offensive and outdated, and it is more appropriate to use specific diagnoses when referring to individuals with certain conditions.
  • #1
pikapika!
28
0
I can't remember what i was told but in science class the teacher just said that incest just enforced the weaknesses in your genes such as color blindness.

Also, I was watching this documentry once of how egyptian phaoros often had children from incest and as a resultant they had deformations like abnormally large hips and as a result of there deformations didnt live as long.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #2
pikapika! said:
I can't remember what i was told but in science class the teacher just said that incest just enforced the weaknesses in your genes such as color blindness.

Also, I was watching this documentry once of how egyptian phaoros often had children from incest and as a resultant they had deformations like abnormally large hips and as a result of there deformations didnt live as long.

"retards"? Let me guess you were going for the politically correct look.

Incest increases the chance of rare recessive traits showing up. For example, if a man has an allele of a rare genetic disorder, which is a recessive than it is very unlikely for that person to mate with a another person who also has the recessive allele. So most likely the trait will never show up. But, if the same man mates with his sister, there is a very good likelyhood that she too will have the recessive allele - so most likely their offspring will inherit the 2 recessive alleles, which will cause the trait to be manefested.

An example of this is lab retrievers. They are breed very pure, but b/c of this the is a rare hip disorder that is displayed in an unusually large number of dogs.

Nautica
 
  • #3
pikapika! said:
the weaknesses in your genes such as color blindness.
Since I am a person who has been genetically diagnosed as colorblind (I do not have the gene for green cones, therefore I am a deuteromorph, the most common type) I guess it falls upon me top defend our so-called "weakness".

Despite my inability to sometimes correctly match certain items of clothing (my wife is very handy for this), I hardly find this a detriment to my life and I would also point out some of the known advantages of colorblindness. Our ability to ignore certain shades allows us to better define edge/outline characteristics and makes us less likely to be fooled by camouflage. This attribute was and probably still is utilized by military forces who prize the colorblind sniper. Also our night vision is typically better than the average person, I believe due to the shift in rod/cone numbers. Thus these advantages probably dictate the prevalence of colorblindness in our society (~8-10% of males) as it carried a fitness advantage to our hunter-gatherer ancestors.
 
  • #4
We also call this inbreeding depression, where inbreeding causes the decrease in overall fitness of a trait.
 
  • #5
I seem to recall reading somewhere that most mutations were recessive in nature. Is that true? And if so, why?
 
  • #6
thanks for your info on color blindness. but id still rather see a rainbow with all its colors.
 
  • #7
pikapika! said:
thanks for your info on color blindness. but id still rather see a rainbow with all its colors.

well, if you were raised as not seeing any different, it might not make any difference. the term color blind is such a limited term. there are many "colors" we cannot detect, so by your definition, you are colorblind, unless you can see ultraviolet light. :rolleyes:

and i suggest you do a little more research on what a retard is, as the context of how you used it in this topic is quite degrading to a group of people who enhance lives in ways you might not expect.
 
  • #8
What is the politically correct term? metally challenged. I thought that was scientific term.
 
  • #9
While it is true that terms like cretin, idiot, moron and mentally retarded originate from medical and judiciary circles, such labels are rarely used today, even in science, and are typically associated with offensive and/or derogatory statements. Generally when referring to individuals who live with such conditions the exact syndrome, disease, etc is used, i.e., Down's syndrome, Asperger's..., rather than lumping vastly differing levels of functioning, even within a single disease-type, into some convenient class.

Definition's for mentally retarded status are easily found on the web or one can check the latest Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) at most libraries. You will probably find that most of the definitions are associated with law and judiciary procedures. These remain because changing laws that are on the books is a particularly complicated task.

pikapika! said:
thanks for your info on color blindness. but id still rather see a rainbow with all its colors.
The term "colorblind" is rather misleading as Kerrie states. I can see all primary colors and enjoy a rainbow as much as the next person. Where it comes into play is in shading between colors. Thus on a graded color scale between green and brown, what you might call brown, I see as green, but at either end I can see the parent colors. True colorblindness, or monochromacy, results in seeing only black, white and shades of gray and is extremely rare. Check out this website for an excellent review of colorblindness and a chance to see how I experience things. http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/primer/java/humanvision/colorblindness/
 

1. What is incest?

Incest is the sexual relationship between two individuals who are closely related by blood or marriage.

2. Does incest really produce retards?

There is no scientific evidence to support the claim that incest produces "retards" or individuals with intellectual disabilities. In fact, studies have shown that the risk of genetic abnormalities in children of closely related individuals is only slightly higher than that of unrelated couples.

3. Why is incest considered taboo?

Incest is considered taboo in many cultures because it involves a violation of social and cultural norms, and can lead to power imbalances and exploitation within families. It can also result in genetic abnormalities in offspring.

4. Are there any potential consequences of incest?

In addition to potential genetic abnormalities in offspring, incest can also have negative psychological effects on both the individuals involved and their family members. It can also lead to legal and social consequences, such as criminal charges and social ostracism.

5. Is there any benefit to studying incest in a scientific context?

Studying incest can provide insights into the societal and cultural attitudes towards taboo subjects, as well as the psychological and genetic effects of this behavior. It can also inform discussions and policies surrounding issues such as sexual abuse and consent.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
2
Replies
67
Views
10K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
659
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
5
Views
20K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top