Delta Epsilon Limits Proving: a+L and a*L

In summary, the homework statement given is that lim f(x)=L as x approaches a . To prove this, the author uses the delta-epsilon definition of limit and proves that lim x*f(x)=aL as x approaches a .
  • #1
Shelby
4
0

Homework Statement



Given that lim f(x)=L as x approaches a , prove that lim (x+f(x))=a+L as x approaches ahttps://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/9630. Your proof cannot assume that the limit of a sum of two functions is the sum of their individual limits. You must use the delta-epsilon definition of limit in your proof.
and
Given that lim f(x)=L as x approaches a , prove that lim x*f(x)=aL as x approaches a

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


attempt is in the attatchment
 

Attachments

  • task 4 math part 1 and 2.doc
    29 KB · Views: 348
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Next, the negative must be distributed to the “a” and to the “L” of (a + L) and an L must be substituted for f(x) because it is given that the [tex]\lim_{x \rightarrow a} f(x) = L[/tex]
|x + L - a - L|...
That part is wrong, you cannot sub L for f(x) like that, it's not correct.

Now, back at the start, the problem gives that:
[tex]\lim_{x \rightarrow a} f(x) = L[/tex], and you must use this to prove: [tex]\lim_{x \rightarrow a} [x + f(x) ] = a + L[/tex]
[tex]\lim_{x \rightarrow a} f(x) = L[/tex] means that, for any arbitrary small [tex]\epsilon[/tex], there exists a [tex]\delta[/tex], such that:
[tex]0 < |x - a| < \delta \Rightarrow |f(x) - L| < \epsilon[/tex]What we should prove is:
For any arbitrary small [tex]\epsilon_1[/tex], there exists a [tex]\delta_1[/tex], such that:
[tex]0 < |x - a| < \delta_1 \Rightarrow |[x + f(x)] - [a + L]| < \epsilon_1[/tex]

We will deal with this part:
[tex]|[x + f(x)] - [a + L]| = |(x - a) + [f(x) - L]| < |x - a| + |f(x) - L|[/tex]Now we choose, [tex]\epsilon = \frac{\epsilon_1}{2}[/tex].

Now, there should exists a [tex]\delta[/tex], such that: [tex]0 < |x - a| < \delta \Rightarrow |f(x) - L| < \epsilon = \frac{\epsilon_1}{2}[/tex]
Choose [tex]\delta_1[/tex], so that: [tex]\delta_1 = \mbox{min} \left( \delta, \frac{\epsilon_1}{2} \right)[/tex]

[tex]\delta_1 = \mbox{min} \left( \delta, \frac{\epsilon_1}{2} \right) \Rightarrow \delta_1 \leq \delta[/tex], so we have:
[tex]0 < |x - a| < \delta_1 \leq \delta \Rightarrow |f(x) - L| < \epsilon = \frac{\epsilon_1}{2}[/tex]

[tex]\delta_1 = \mbox{min} \left( \delta, \frac{\epsilon_1}{2} \right) \Rightarrow \delta_1 \leq \frac{\epsilon}{2}[/tex]Now, if we have:
[tex]0 < |x - a| < \delta_1 \Rightarrow |[x + f(x)] - [a + L]| < |x - a| + |f(x) - L| < \delta_1 + \epsilon < \frac{\epsilon_1}{2} + \frac{\epsilon_1}{2} = \epsilon_1[/tex], so:
[tex]\lim_{x \rightarrow a} [x + f(x) ] = a + L[/tex] (Q.E.D)

Is there any where unclear?
Can you do the same to part II? :)
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Thank you, I do have one question

Why did you choose to divide epsilon 1 by 2?
 
  • #4
because eventually you want to sum up two of them.. and 1/2 +1/2 =1 gives you just one epsilon... and this matches the target you want to reach. that's all
 
  • #5
Shelby said:
Why did you choose to divide epsilon 1 by 2?
Since you want to prove that:
[tex]|[x + f(x)] - [a + L]| = |(x - a) + [f(x) - L]| < |x - a| + |f(x) - L| < \epsilon_1[/tex], i.e, the sum of |x - a|, and |f(x) - L|, so it's natural to choose the sum of [tex]\frac{\epsilon_1}{2}[/tex], and [tex]\frac{\epsilon_1}{2}[/tex], as [tex]\frac{\epsilon_1}{2} + \frac{\epsilon_1}{2} = \epsilon_1[/tex].
Then assign [tex]\delta, \ \delta_1 , \ \epsilon[/tex] wisely, so that: [tex]|x - a| < \frac{\epsilon_1}{2}[/tex], and [tex]|f(x) - L| < \frac{\epsilon_1}{2}[/tex]
 
  • #6
I think I understand the process shown for the above proof but if someone could provide the second part it would improve my understanding. Given that lim f(x)=L as x approaches a , prove that lim x*f(x)=aL as x approaches a using the delta epsilon definition of a limit. This would be much appreciated. Thanks.
 
  • #7
just try it yourselves! Use the method and I'm confident it will work out!
 

1. What is Delta Epsilon Limits Proving?

Delta Epsilon Limits Proving is a mathematical method used to prove the limit of a function. It involves using the concepts of delta and epsilon to determine the closeness of a function's output to its limit.

2. What is the significance of a+L and a*L in Delta Epsilon Limits Proving?

In Delta Epsilon Limits Proving, a+L and a*L represent the upper and lower bounds, respectively, of the function's output. These values are used to determine the closeness of the function's output to its limit.

3. How does Delta Epsilon Limits Proving work?

In Delta Epsilon Limits Proving, a function is said to have a limit L at a point a if for any given epsilon (ε), there exists a corresponding delta (δ) such that when the distance between the input and a is less than delta, the distance between the output and L is less than epsilon.

4. What are the conditions for Delta Epsilon Limits Proving to be applicable?

For Delta Epsilon Limits Proving to be applicable, the function must be defined and continuous at the point a. Additionally, the limit L must exist.

5. What is the difference between a+L and a*L in Delta Epsilon Limits Proving?

The difference between a+L and a*L in Delta Epsilon Limits Proving is that a+L represents the upper bound, while a*L represents the lower bound. These values are used to determine the closeness of the function's output to its limit and help to prove the existence of the limit.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
872
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
985
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
841
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
305
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top