Magnatars (Hypothetical Question)

  • Thread starter 1Truthseeker
  • Start date
In summary, a strong magnetic field would be lethal to humans even at a distance of 1000 km, and would also affect non-ferrous materials. Magnetars are not visible in the visual spectrum, but they do emit EM radiation.
  • #1
1Truthseeker
43
0
This is a question for the astronomers and other scientists that have knowledge of magnatars. I am conducting some research for a science fiction novel, and I would like to be somewhat reasonable in my canon. Here is my question:

How many AUs would be the minimum safe distance from a somewhat older magnatar (older, because it has a period of say 8-10 seconds). The hypothetical purpose would be to observe/study its strong magnetic field and perhaps (again, science fiction so don't take this the wrong way) sap its angular momentum through reactive inductance by placing a load on the field.

I realize that this is so out of the ordinary, but it is a hard science fiction novel and I would appreciate any knowledge you could give in regard to this scenario. I realize that the magnetic fields of magnatars are unimaginably strong, so I am figuring it will have to be quite a distance.

Thanks in advance for any that take the time to seriously answer this question.

Humbly,
Ts.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
Here's wikipedia's page on Magnetars-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetar"

Quote-
The magnetic field of a magnetar would be lethal even at a distance of 1000 km, tearing tissues due to the diamagnetism of water. At a distance halfway to the moon, a magnetar could strip information from all credit cards on Earth.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
Thanks for the reply. I had posted here because I felt the Wikipedia article on maganatars did not sufficiently answer my questions or give me a level of assurance. I was hoping to find an authoritative response from an astronomer or cosmologist before I based my entire novel around the concept.
 
  • #4
I guess for a first approximation, the 3 pieces of information we need are
1) What is the strength of the magnetar's magnetic field at a given distance?
2) How fast does said magnetic field decay?
3) In how strong of a magnetic field can humans in a spaceship survive?

Now I am just doing some guess work: Let's take the magnetar's field to be 10^10 tesla at the magnetar's surface (R = 10km). I think it is reasonable to assume the field is like a dipole, and thus decays as 1/r^3. Finally, we need to do some guesswork as to what magnetic field a spaceship could withstand. This is probably pretty flexible for a sci-fi story though. But let's say it can withstand a magnetic pressure of 1000 atmospheres.

We then want to solve

[tex]\frac{B^2\left(r/10\textnormal{km}\right)^{-6}}{2\mu_0} = 1000\textnormal{atm}
[/tex]

If I do this I get an answer of... 10^109 metres?!?... Well clearly I am either calculating wrong or one of my assumptions (most likely the dipole assumption) is wrong. Hopefully someone can add some insight to this post.
 
  • #5
nicksauce said:
I guess for a first approximation, the 3 pieces of information we need are
1) What is the strength of the magnetar's magnetic field at a given distance?
2) How fast does said magnetic field decay?
3) In how strong of a magnetic field can humans in a spaceship survive?

Now I am just doing some guess work: Let's take the magnetar's field to be 10^10 tesla at the magnetar's surface (R = 10km). I think it is reasonable to assume the field is like a dipole, and thus decays as 1/r^3. Finally, we need to do some guesswork as to what magnetic field a spaceship could withstand. This is probably pretty flexible for a sci-fi story though. But let's say it can withstand a magnetic pressure of 1000 atmospheres.

We then want to solve

[tex]\frac{B^2\left(r/10\textnormal{km}\right)^{-6}}{2\mu_0} = 1000\textnormal{atm}
[/tex]

If I do this I get an answer of... 10^109 metres?!?... Well clearly I am either calculating wrong or one of my assumptions (most likely the dipole assumption) is wrong. Hopefully someone can add some insight to this post.

Thank you for this reply. I have a question: will a strong magnetic field affect non-ferrous materials? For example, if the station were made of some type of material that did not interact with it, would it not then have affect on how deep within the field it was? (Notwithstanding gravity).

Also, are magnetars emissivity in the visual spectrum? Ie: would the depiction that an individual observing it from a safe distance seeing it "pulse" light a light house require viewing in upper bands of EM or would it be a visible dim white like that of neutron stars?

Thank you again, I apologize for these ignorant questions but they are very helpful in making this story seem at least plausible.
 
  • #6
Dare we assume the magnetic pole is aligned with the spin axis ? If not, your intrepid explorers not only have the steady field, but a very significant cyclic variation. It would surely induce ferocious eddy currents in a metal hull. Perhaps you need to surround the crew area with a superconductive shell to repel the magnetic field and 'shield' the occupants ?
 
  • #7
Nik_2213 said:
Dare we assume the magnetic pole is aligned with the spin axis ? If not, your intrepid explorers not only have the steady field, but a very significant cyclic variation. It would surely induce ferocious eddy currents in a metal hull. Perhaps you need to surround the crew area with a superconductive shell to repel the magnetic field and 'shield' the occupants ?

Hmm very interesting insight into that. I had naively assumed it would be aligned with the spin axis. I am thinking that a distance of 0.5 to 1 AUs is a minimum. But I am just guessing. Perhaps I am over thinking this. :)
 

1. What are magnatars?

Magnatars are hypothetical astronomical objects that are believed to have a magnetic field that is trillions of times stronger than the Earth's magnetic field.

2. How are magnatars formed?

Magnatars are believed to be formed when a massive star collapses, causing the core to shrink and the magnetic field to intensify. This process is similar to the formation of neutron stars.

3. What is the difference between a magnatar and a neutron star?

Magnatars and neutron stars are both formed from the collapse of massive stars, but magnatars have a much stronger magnetic field. In fact, the magnetic field of a magnatar could be strong enough to disrupt atomic nuclei, while the magnetic field of a neutron star is not as powerful.

4. Can magnatars be observed?

Currently, there is no evidence of the existence of magnatars, so they cannot be directly observed. However, scientists are studying pulsars, which are rotating neutron stars with strong magnetic fields, to learn more about the potential properties of magnatars.

5. What impact could magnatars have on the universe?

If magnatars do exist, they could have a significant impact on the universe. Their extremely strong magnetic fields could affect the behavior of matter and radiation in their surroundings, influencing the formation of stars and galaxies. They could also play a role in cosmic events such as supernovae and gamma-ray bursts.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
903
Replies
1
Views
317
Replies
3
Views
659
Replies
2
Views
607
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
685
Back
Top