Is flight without moving parts possible?

In summary, the conversation discusses the fascination of ionocraft as a topic for a tenth grader with an interest in electronics. The possibility of creating a viable ionocraft using technologies such as microchannel plates and electron multipliers is also raised, along with the question of its practical use. The user is advised to repost their question without using a poll format and to consider posting in the Mechanical Engineering/Aerospace forum.

Do you think ionocraft development could have a lasting affect on AEEM?

  • Yes(definitely)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Borderline(maybe yes, maybe no)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • No(improbable)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total voters
    0
  • Poll closed .
  • #1
THP115
9
0
As a tenth grader with electronics on the mind, ionocraft is probably one of the most interesting topics I have run across(besides the Casimir effect; that, I believe, is quantum physics). But, what I am truly interested in is whether or not it is possible, with the use of technologies such as microchannel plates or electron multipliers, to produce a viable ionocraft that could actually have a practicle use. Do you think this is possible? Give your opinion(of course, with some reasoning).
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Welcome to the PF.

We generally do not allow polls in the technical forums here on the PF (as opposed to the General Discussion forum, where polls are generally allowed).

I have closed this thread. Please re-post your question, but not in poll form. Also, you may want to post in the Mechanical Engineering/Aerospace forum instead, which would seem to be a better match for your question.
 

1. Can an object fly without any moving parts?

Yes, it is possible for an object to fly without any moving parts. This type of flight is known as static lift or buoyancy, where the object is able to stay afloat due to the difference in air pressure above and below its surface.

2. How does static lift work?

Static lift works by utilizing the principles of Bernoulli's equation, which states that as the speed of a fluid increases, its pressure decreases. In the case of flight without moving parts, the object is designed in such a way that air flows faster over the top of its surface, creating an area of low pressure that lifts the object up.

3. What are some examples of flight without moving parts?

Some examples of flight without moving parts include hot air balloons, blimps, and airships. These objects use the principle of static lift to stay afloat in the air without any mechanical components.

4. Is flight without moving parts as efficient as traditional flight?

No, flight without moving parts is not as efficient as traditional flight using moving parts like wings and propellers. This is because it requires a large amount of energy to maintain the difference in air pressure that keeps the object afloat. However, it can still be a useful and cost-effective method for certain applications such as aerial surveillance or advertising.

5. Are there any limitations to flight without moving parts?

Yes, there are some limitations to flight without moving parts. It is heavily dependent on weather conditions, as changes in temperature and wind can greatly affect the lift generated by the object. Additionally, it is not suitable for high-speed flight and is limited in its maneuverability compared to traditional flight methods.

Similar threads

Flight, without moving parts
    • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
14
Views
4K
A In light of new evidence, what might be behind the Casimir Effect?
    • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
46
Views
2K
I Nuclear reactions in the Sun and other topics on stars
    • Astronomy and Astrophysics
2
Replies
49
Views
2K
Are these internal combusion (IC) engine claims physically possible?
    • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
1
Views
886
Requesting suggestions for languages, libraries, and architectures for parallel (and sometimes non parallel) numerical and scientific computations
    • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
8
Views
2K
Focus all of your ire on me, if you would
    • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
650
Is Alan Turing given too much credit when it comes to computers?
    • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
29
Views
3K
Chemistry 35yo combustion chemistry PhD, free time and still no plan
    • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
4
Views
1K
Other 2 years for MS Eng or Longer for MS Physics? Science Entrepreneur Qs
    • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
3
Views
966
Foundation Earth - seed package to reboot a technical society
    • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
9
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top