Feb26-12, 11:54 AM
I was going through my notes on different finite difference methods and came across something I don't quite understand. I have code that will calculate an approximate solution we can call this U_nm that I define on a grid using h and dt for the change in x and time respectively. Now I have written down the global error is just
e_nm =|U_nm - u(xn,tn)|
where u(xn,tn) is the exact solution evaluated at the gird points.
From there we can calculate our rate of convergence
So naively I just assumed I could take the solution I calculate and subtract the exact solution at every point take the absolute value. However, I have written something about actually just using e_nm to calculate the initial values as well as boundary conditions and then plugging them back into the finite difference method to calculate all the grid points for all of e_nm.
Is this correct or did I perhaps not fully understand what my instructor was saying?
(Note we are working with forward, backward and crank-nicolson methods)
|Register to reply|
|Finite element method versus intergrated finite difference for complex geometries?||Differential Equations||6|
|Linear & nonlinear shooting and linear & nonlinear finite difference methods||Calculus & Beyond Homework||0|
|Numerical methods: Finite difference and spectral methods?||Differential Equations||1|
|Finite difference methods||Calculus & Beyond Homework||2|
|Finite Difference Methods||Differential Equations||4|