Does Intention or Interpretation Hold More Weight in Communication?

In summary, the outcome of communication is influenced by both the persuader and the person being persuaded. While the persuader may have more initial influence, their intentions may not always align with the perception of the other person. Ultimately, the success of communication relies on how the other person receives and interprets the message.
  • #1
Loren Booda
3,125
4
Which carries a greater weight regarding the outcome of communication? E. g., if I encourage an individual to go out with me, and they respond according to their personal judgment, whose action would be more influential in the general milieu?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If by respond you mean they agree I venture to say the persuader had the greater influence on the outcome but this must be weighed (for whatever the reason?) by the quality of the persuasion required against the judgement of the persuaded. Then again maybe they blindsided you into 'persuading them' because this was their desire all along.
 
  • #3
Maybe we often see ourselves as one when, in fact, we are the other.
 
  • #4
Loren Booda said:
Maybe we often see ourselves as one when, in fact, we are the other.

the other person?
 
  • #5
Encouraging an individual to go out, is disequally weighted. If energy of encouragement must be exerted, then the other person either has time constraints, doubts, aversion, xenophobia, or some other x factor. In the realm of human dynamics, intention can be an ill fitting garment that covers a host of other vying motivations. Many times people claim high intent, but it is just handy like a hat. See I have my hat on, let's go out.
 
  • #6
Intention matters more to the intender, but the way the person you are communicating with takes your gesture is what will ultimately matter more to the success of your attempt to get your point across. If they take it the wrong way, they'll take it the wrong way, regardless of what you intend.
 

1. What is the difference between intention and interpretation?

The intention refers to the purpose or goal behind an action or communication, while interpretation is the understanding or meaning attributed to that action or communication by the receiver. In simpler terms, intention is what the sender wants to convey, while interpretation is how the receiver understands it.

2. Can intention and interpretation be different?

Yes, intention and interpretation can be different. Our intentions may not always align with how others interpret our actions or communication. This can be due to various factors such as cultural differences, past experiences, and personal biases.

3. How do intention and interpretation affect communication?

Intention and interpretation play a crucial role in communication. If the intention is not effectively conveyed or if it is misinterpreted, it can lead to misunderstandings and conflicts. On the other hand, when the interpretation aligns with the intention, it can strengthen relationships and promote effective communication.

4. Can intention and interpretation change over time?

Yes, intention and interpretation can change over time. As individuals and circumstances change, our intentions and interpretations may also evolve. This is why clear and open communication is important to avoid misunderstandings and ensure that intentions are accurately conveyed and interpreted.

5. How can we ensure that our intentions are accurately interpreted?

To ensure that our intentions are accurately interpreted, we can use effective communication techniques such as being clear and specific in our messages, actively listening to others, and being aware of our own biases and assumptions. It is also important to consider the context and perspective of the receiver to better understand their interpretation.

Similar threads

Exploring the Limitations of QM Interpretations in Fiction
    • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
817
A Game theory, quantum physics and the Bell inequality (paper)
    • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
2
Views
765
I Could Tim Maudlin's Views on Bell and QM Be Flawed?
    • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
37
Views
1K
I Is Energy an Illusion in the Many-Worlds Interpretation?
    • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Sticky
I Quantum Interpretations and Foundations Guidelines
    • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
1
Views
4K
A Loophole-free test of local realism via Hardy's violation
    • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
37
Views
1K
Why Information Grows: book review
    • General Discussion
Replies
3
Views
981
I A Bold New Take on Quantum Theory
    • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
25
Views
1K
A Can entanglement be detected in a single Bell pair?
    • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
815
A Post-Selection: Pre-existing Correlations or Action At A Distance?
    • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
54
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top