- #1
Kolahal Bhattacharya
- 135
- 1
We know,n=(rel.permittivityxrel.permeability)^(1/2)
For natural transperant mediums (to visible light of EM spectrum)are non-magnetic.So, rel.permeability=1
hence n=(dielectric constant)^(1/2)
Book says this is not valid for all materials,as dielectric constant is frequency dependent.Why yhis is not the case with vacuum?
As far as I know, we are familiar to r.i. s which are measured at the frequency of visible light.Book says dielectric constant are measured at much lower frequency.Why?why not we measure it at optical frequency?Wikipedia says static dielectric constant is a good approx.for altering field of low frequency--why?
For natural transperant mediums (to visible light of EM spectrum)are non-magnetic.So, rel.permeability=1
hence n=(dielectric constant)^(1/2)
Book says this is not valid for all materials,as dielectric constant is frequency dependent.Why yhis is not the case with vacuum?
As far as I know, we are familiar to r.i. s which are measured at the frequency of visible light.Book says dielectric constant are measured at much lower frequency.Why?why not we measure it at optical frequency?Wikipedia says static dielectric constant is a good approx.for altering field of low frequency--why?