Register to reply

Centre of mass frame in nuclear reactions?

by AntiElephant
Tags: centre, frame, mass, nuclear, reactions
Share this thread:
AntiElephant
#1
Mar7-14, 05:58 AM
P: 20
I'm slightly confused as to how we discuss centre of mass frames in nuclear reactions.

We have the reaction a(A,B)b. Before the reaction we can transfer to the centre of mass frame

[itex] v_c = \frac{\sum m_i v_i}{\sum m_i} [/itex]

and note that the total energy before the reaction is

[itex] E_{CM} = E_{masses~before} + E_{kinetic~before~in~CM} [/itex]

And the total energy after is

[itex] E_{CM} = E_{masses~after} + E_{kinetic~after~in~CM} [/itex]

The problem I'm having to understand is that these two before/after energies are often equated, but the centre of mass frame is not a constant since the masses are not constant in a nuclear reaction, so [itex] v_c [/itex] changes since the denominator [itex] \sum m_i [/itex] changes (numerator remains the same due to conservation of momentum).

Am I wrong here? If I were to guess why we can do this, it's because the change in masses is so small that we can assume the centre of mass frame is constant before/after the reaction. But then this discussion breaks down when we're considering only light particles and the fractional mass change is larger, right?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Scientists uncover clues to role of magnetism in iron-based superconductors
Researchers find first direct evidence of 'spin symmetry' in atoms
X-ray laser probes tiny quantum tornadoes in superfluid droplets
jbriggs444
#2
Mar7-14, 08:01 AM
P: 930
Am I wrong here? If I were to guess why we can do this, it's because the change in masses is so small that we can assume the centre of mass frame is constant before/after the reaction. But then this discussion breaks down when we're considering only light particles and the fractional mass change is larger, right?
Momentum is conserved. If you work in a frame where total momentum is zero before the interaction then total momentum will also be zero after the interaction.

The formula:

[itex] v_c = \frac{\sum m_i v_i}{\sum m_i} [/itex]

is a non-relativistic approximation. It will not, in general, correctly tell you the relative velocity of the frame in which total momentum is zero.
dauto
#3
Mar7-14, 09:51 AM
Thanks
P: 1,948
The relativistic formula for the speed of the center of mass is

[itex] v_c = \frac{\sum m_i \gamma_i v_i}{\sum m_i \gamma_i}, [/itex]

where [tex]\gamma_i = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v_i^2}{c^2}}}[/tex]

jbriggs444
#4
Mar7-14, 02:11 PM
P: 930
Centre of mass frame in nuclear reactions?

Quote Quote by dauto View Post
The relativistic formula for the speed of the center of mass is

[itex] v_c = \frac{\sum m_i \gamma_i v_i}{\sum m_i \gamma_i}, [/itex]

where [tex]\gamma_i = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v_i^2}{c^2}}}[/tex]
That seems not to account for the possibility of massless particles moving at light speed. May I assume that one would simply divide total momentum by total energy (using units in which c=1) to cover that case?
dauto
#5
Mar7-14, 03:06 PM
Thanks
P: 1,948
Quote Quote by jbriggs444 View Post
That seems not to account for the possibility of massless particles moving at light speed. May I assume that one would simply divide total momentum by total energy (using units in which c=1) to cover that case?
Yes.
Silversonic
#6
Mar8-14, 09:13 AM
P: 129
So the frame in which the momentum is zero, is the same before and after a nuclear reaction, because the actual formula takes relativistic mass changes in to account?
mfb
#7
Mar8-14, 06:28 PM
Mentor
P: 11,831
Yes.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Do I have to re-define electric field strength in Centre of Mass frame Classical Physics 5
A Question about Mass Defects in Nuclear Reactions, and a few more general questions High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 1
Collisions in the centre of mass frame Classical Physics 5
Centre of mass frame velocity Advanced Physics Homework 0
Centre of Mass frame of colliding molecules Classical Physics 2