New Reply

Integrating a function of the complex conjugate of x with respect to dx

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Jun8-12, 08:55 AM   #1
 

Integrating a function of the complex conjugate of x with respect to dx


The reason I ask the aforementioned question is because I came across the expectation values of operators in Quantum Mechanics. And part of the computation involves integrating a function of the complex conjugate of x with respect to dx.

So as an example let's say I have:

∫ sin (x*) dx where the * denotes the complex conjugate.

How would I do it? (I would post an attempt to solve it but I have no idea whether to even treat the x* as a constant, or variable or.....something).


Thank you in advance for any help you may provide.
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> King Richard III found in 'untidy lozenge-shaped grave'
>> Google Drive sports new view and scan enhancements
>> Researcher admits mistakes in stem cell study
Jun8-12, 09:17 AM   #2
 
Is [itex]x[/itex] a complex variable, then?
Jun8-12, 09:26 AM   #3
 
Yes, x is a complex variable.
Jun8-12, 01:30 PM   #4
 

Integrating a function of the complex conjugate of x with respect to dx


If your x is just real or imaginary conjugate(x) = x or conjugate(x) = -x and so integration can be performed pretty easily.

I don't believe the function sin(conjugate(z)) is holomorphic so it won't end up having a complex anti-derivative.

This mean that numerical integration will be needed.
Jun8-12, 03:46 PM   #5
 
Is it a definite or indefinite integral?

If it is definite, what path would you like to use? A complex integral can be looked at as a path integral in the plane, for which a parametrization might make it feasible to calculate exactly.

But like Skrew said, this does not look amenable to methods from complex analysis like computing residues.
Jun8-12, 04:11 PM   #6
 
Quote by Skrew View Post
If your x is just real or imaginary conjugate(x) = x or conjugate(x) = -x and so integration can be performed pretty easily.

I don't believe the function sin(conjugate(z)) is holomorphic so it won't end up having a complex anti-derivative.

This mean that numerical integration will be needed.
IN Fact holomorphic depends on the derivative wrt z* to be zero
Jun8-12, 10:38 PM   #7
 
Quote by Mandlebra View Post
IN Fact holomorphic depends on the derivative wrt z* to be zero
I'm not well versed on different approaches but my book defines d/dz and d/d(conjugate(z)) to be such that the cauchy Riemman equations are satisified IFF d/d(conjugate(z)) = 0, at which point the definition of the derivative can be applied and the limit exists.

Is there another way to look at this using the difference quotient of conjugate(z)?
Jun11-12, 06:16 PM   #8
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Some insight may be gained by considering the integral over a path P consisting of a straight line segment at angle θ to the real axis:
[itex]\int_{P}f(z).d\overline{z} = e^{2i\theta} \int_{P}f(z).dz[/itex]
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Integrating a function of the complex conjugate of x with respect to dx
Thread Forum Replies
How/when can I take a wave function and its complex conjugate as independent? Quantum Physics 1
Partial derivative with respect to complex conjugate Calculus 2
Complex function conjugate Calculus & Beyond Homework 4
Integrating the Complex conjugate of z with respect to z Calculus & Beyond Homework 5
Complex conjugate of wave function Quantum Physics 4