Register to reply

∇E = 0 in an Ohmic, 2d Hall conductor with constant B?

Share this thread:
Apr30-13, 06:46 AM
P: 155
I've been trying to figure this out for long now but unfortunally, I'm not able to prove that ∇E = 0 in an Ohmic, 2d Hall conductor E = Rj + vB with B = const (and orthogonal to j).

There is quite a bit of subtlety involved in how to interpret v in that sort of ad-hoc generalization of Ohm's law, and I'm not 100% sure I got that right. If we define ρ by j := ρv and assume a static background-charge ρ' so that ∇E = (ρ' + ρ)/ε I end up at

∇E = -1/ρ(Bj + B/(ρR)j)∇ρ

from Ohm's relation. However, I don't see how that would prove that ∇E = 0 given that this PDE appears to have nontrivial solutions for j's which satisfy ∇j = 0.

Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.

Edit: I just thought of something: Perhaps this depends on assumptions concerning the carriers of charge. In particular that the mobile charges are strictly of one sign and thus ρ > 0! Then it could possibly be shown that the PDE cannot be satisfied. Investigating...
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on
Physical constant is constant even in strong gravitational fields
Physicists provide new insights into the world of quantum materials
Nuclear spins control current in plastic LED: Step toward quantum computing, spintronic memory, better displays

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Hall constant & Electron concentration. Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 0
Ohmic conductor, when R tends to zero I=V/R General Physics 15
Ohmic heating in a conductor Advanced Physics Homework 5
(u.∇)u = ∇(1/2u^2)+w∧u Advanced Physics Homework 13
Hall resistance and fine structre constant General Physics 8