Solving Solenoids & Toroids: Show Approximation

  • Thread starter Chris W
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation is discussing the problem of approximating the magnetic field in a large toroid as the magnetic field in a small solenoid. The equations for the magnetic field in a solenoid and a toroid are given, and the dimensions and variables of each equation are clarified. The goal is to use the solution for the toroid to obtain the solution for the solenoid by taking the correct limit. It is mentioned that in the limit where the radius of the toroid is much larger than the inner and outer radii, the solution can be approximated as the magnetic field in a small solenoid.
  • #1
Chris W
27
0
Hi everyone.
I need help please.
I am working on problems with solenoids and Toroids
I have solution for the solenoid:
B = μo i n

And toroid:
B = (μ o i n)/ (2Π r)
Also, I know that the magnetic field is the function of r namely: B = B(r)

r- radius of the Ampere’s path
n – number of loops per unit length
i-Current
μo – constant

My problem is:
Using the solution for the toroid, show that for the large toroid the answer can be approximated as the solenoid on the very small piece of the toroid.
I know that I have to play with limits. Something like:
a - inner radius of the toroid,
b – outer radius of the toroid,
∆a - the difference between radius a and radius b.
I think I have to take a limit when ∆a goes to 0 and in this way radius a will approach radius b. in this way the solution for the toroid SHOULD be the solution for the solenoid (on the small length L of course)
I don’t know how to set it up. How to get from the toroid solution to the solenoid solution using limits or (other technique)

Thanks for help
Chris W
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Chris W said:
Hi everyone.
I need help please.
I am working on problems with solenoids and Toroids
I have solution for the solenoid:
B = μo i n

And toroid:
B = (μ o i n)/ (2Π r)
Also, I know that the magnetic field is the function of r namely: B = B(r)

r- radius of the Ampere’s path
n – number of loops per unit length
i-Current
μo – constant

My problem is:
Using the solution for the toroid, show that for the large toroid the answer can be approximated as the solenoid on the very small piece of the toroid.
I know that I have to play with limits. Something like:
a - inner radius of the toroid,
b – outer radius of the toroid,
∆a - the difference between radius a and radius b.
I think I have to take a limit when ∆a goes to 0 and in this way radius a will approach radius b. in this way the solution for the toroid SHOULD be the solution for the solenoid (on the small length L of course)
I don’t know how to set it up. How to get from the toroid solution to the solenoid solution using limits or (other technique)

Thanks for help
Chris W

You should be more specific. The B fields you gave are the B fields evaluated where exactly? And your two equations can't both be right since they don't even have the same dimensions. There is something missing in your toroid expression.

(Hint: the two "n" do not have the same meaning)
 
  • #3
Thanks nrqed

hmmm... I see it now... yeah...

-ok the calculated B field is in the toroid between the radius a and radius b.
-as for the meaning of n?? Yeah you are correct! there are two different n's

-I checked my math and I see now that the correct values for the B fields are:

for the Solenoid

B=μo*i*n

n - # of turn/ unit length
μo - constant (mu subscript o)



For the Toroid:

B=(μo*i*N)/(2*pi*r)

also, the strength of the B field id the function of r: B=B(r)

r - radius to the Ampere's Path a<r<b
N - # total number of loops in the toroid

__________________________________________________________________________
I was thinking about it and looks like I can say that:

a- inner radius of the toroid
b- outer radius of the toroid
(delta a) = b-a
r - radius of the Ampere's Path a<r<b
so...

b=(delta a)+a

limit when (delta a) goes to 0, than a=b
and I am stuck here...

___________________________________________________________________________
The goal is to use the solution of B field for the toroid ( INSIDE the toroid) and by taking the correct limit (or using other method) to obtain the solution for the B field of the solenoid INSIDE the SOLENOID.
So basically when (Delta a) is very small (limit goes to 0) over the small, call it; ds over solution looks like the regular, finite, straight solenoid with the B field inside.

Once again thanks a lot nrqed
Your comment opened my eyes a little bit.
I am still stuck, but I feel I am a step closer.

Any ideas? Need better explanation? I can derive the B fields for the solenoid and toroid if needed.

Please help!
I can be more specific if needed.

Chris W
_____________________________________________________________________________
 
  • #4
Chris W said:
Thanks nrqed

hmmm... I see it now... yeah...

-ok the calculated B field is in the toroid between the radius a and radius b.
-as for the meaning of n?? Yeah you are correct! there are two different n's

-I checked my math and I see now that the correct values for the B fields are:

for the Solenoid

B=μo*i*n

n - # of turn/ unit length
μo - constant (mu subscript o)



For the Toroid:

B=(μo*i*N)/(2*pi*r)

also, the strength of the B field id the function of r: B=B(r)

r - radius to the Ampere's Path a<r<b
N - # total number of loops in the toroid

__________________________________________________________________________
I was thinking about it and looks like I can say that:

a- inner radius of the toroid
b- outer radius of the toroid
(delta a) = b-a
r - radius of the Ampere's Path a<r<b
so...

b=(delta a)+a

limit when (delta a) goes to 0, than a=b
and I am stuck here...

___________________________________________________________________________
The goal is to use the solution of B field for the toroid ( INSIDE the toroid) and by taking the correct limit (or using other method) to obtain the solution for the B field of the solenoid INSIDE the SOLENOID.
So basically when (Delta a) is very small (limit goes to 0) over the small, call it; ds over solution looks like the regular, finite, straight solenoid with the B field inside.

Once again thanks a lot nrqed
Your comment opened my eyes a little bit.
I am still stuck, but I feel I am a step closer.

Any ideas? Need better explanation? I can derive the B fields for the solenoid and toroid if needed.

Please help!
I can be more specific if needed.

Chris W
_____________________________________________________________________________

It's much simpler than this. In the limit r>>a and r >>b, you can basically say that the length of the toroid is 2 pi R, right? (That's the length of the path for Ampere's law but that's basically the length of the toroid as well in the limit r much larger than a and b).

Now, the answer falls off directly (paying attention to the difference between "n" appearing in the solenoid formula and the "N" appearing in the toroid formula).
 
  • #5
WOW... great

Thanks
This is easy!

Thank you so much !

you rock man!

Chris W
 
  • #6
Chris W said:
WOW... great

Thanks
This is easy!

Thank you so much !

you rock man!

Chris W

:biggrin: You are very welcome!
 
  • #7
Hi all. Hi nrqed!
I Think I have a better way to do it!
hmmm... I was thinking about it and I think I see another way to do it.


the objective is to prove that the solution for the B field of toroid (with small delta a) is the solution of the solenoid (for the B field inside)

Also, I know that

N=n*A*L


so putting all together we have:



N= nAL n=N/AL


B = (μo i N)/(2 Π r) B = μo i n
B = (μo i n A L)/(2 Π r) B = (μo i N)/(A L)


B=B

o i n A L)/(2 Π r)=(μo i N)/(A L)

o i n A L)/(2 Π r)=(μo i N)/(A L)

( n A L)/(2 Π r)=( N)/(A L)


N= nAL
AL = 2 Π r
This is as far as I can go

But… if I say that AL=1 ( and I don't know WHY I can say that...lol)

( n )/(2 Π r)=N

N - # total number of loops in the toroid
n - (# of loops)/(unit length)

let’s check the units


N = (# of loops)/(unit length) * unit length= # of loops ≡ N



I hope I am doing this right.
Can someone please check it?
Nrqed any input?

Thanks

Chris W
 
  • #8
This section is of course:

N= nAL

n=N/AL

it came out together ...sorry
but N is defined above so there shouldn't be any problems
CHRIS W
 
  • #9
Same here:

Toroid Solenoid
B = (μo i N)/(2 Π r) B = μo i n
B = (μo i n A L)/(2 Π r) B = (μo i N)/(A L)
 
  • #10
Man... editing in this form is a challenge

Toroid
B = (μo i N)/(2 Π r)
B = μo i n


Solenoid
B = (μo i n A L)/(2 Π r)
B = (μo i N)/(A L)
 
  • #11
I hope you can follow my math here ...
anyone? please... is this correct?
Thanks
Chris W
 
  • #12
Chris W said:
Hi all. Hi nrqed!
I Think I have a better way to do it!
hmmm... I was thinking about it and I think I see another way to do it.


the objective is to prove that the solution for the B field of toroid (with small delta a) is the solution of the solenoid (for the B field inside)

Also, I know that

N=n*A*L

....

Thanks

Chris W

I don't follow. I don't even know what A is!

The only way to do the problem that I can see is what we discussed yesterday. The only key point is that you must define n= N/(length of the toroid) in order to compare with the solenoid result. But of ocurse, the length of a toroid is not well-defined.


Yesterday, I should NOT have written r>>a and r>>b, that was a mistake. Really, we are taking the limit r>>(b-a) (which also implies a>> (b-a) and b>>(b-a) . I apologize for this mistake.

For a toroid we can define the "inner length" 2pi a, or the "middle length" 2pi r or the outer length 2pi b. In the above limit, they are equal to one another,



For example, write r = a + (b-a)/2 Then clearly 2pi r approaches 2pi a in the limit above


[tex] 2 \pi r = 2 \pi (a + \frac{a-b}{2}) \approx 2 \pi a [/tex]


Patrick
 
  • #13
Thanks Patric!


Yeah I noticed that something is wrong with r>>a and r>>b.
All good man!

Thanks!

yeah a good sport!

Chris W
 

1. What are solenoids and toroids?

Solenoids and toroids are types of electromagnets used in various electronic and electrical devices. They consist of a coil of wire wrapped around a core, which generates a magnetic field when an electric current passes through it.

2. How do you solve for the approximate value of a solenoid or toroid?

To solve for the approximate value of a solenoid or toroid, you will need to know the number of turns in the coil, the length of the coil, the radius of the coil, the permeability of the core material, and the current passing through the coil. You can then use mathematical formulas, such as Ampere's Law and Biot-Savart Law, to calculate the approximate value.

3. What is the importance of approximating solenoids and toroids?

Approximating solenoids and toroids is crucial in order to design and build efficient electronic devices. The approximate value can help determine the strength of the magnetic field produced by the coil, which in turn affects the performance of the device.

4. Are there any limitations to approximating solenoids and toroids?

Yes, there are some limitations to approximating solenoids and toroids. The calculations assume ideal conditions, such as a perfect coil shape and uniform current distribution, which may not always be the case in real-world scenarios. Additionally, the presence of other magnetic fields or materials in the surroundings can also affect the accuracy of the approximation.

5. Can the approximate value of a solenoid or toroid be improved?

Yes, the approximate value can be improved by taking into account factors such as the shape and size of the coil, the material of the core, and the presence of other magnetic fields. This can be achieved through more advanced mathematical models and simulations. Additionally, conducting experiments and testing the device in different conditions can also help improve the accuracy of the approximation.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
443
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
107
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Back
Top