Is it possible for two planets to merge and still sustain life?

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of two partially merged planets in a fantasy world and raises questions about the feasibility of such a scenario. The possibility of sustaining this state, the survival of pre-existing life, gravity, rotation, and other phenomena are discussed. While some ideas are presented, there is no definitive answer and it is likened to a classic 3 body problem in space. The conversation also explores the potential flaws in this concept, such as the release of energy and the impossibility of a "soft landing".
  • #1
Lonewolf27
2
0
Hi people!

Strange request but not having much luck in anything specific to what I'm doing, either that or I'm not sure what i should be searching for...

85739627.jpg


I'm making a fantasy world for a book and wanting to create a single planet that is still distinguishable as having been 2 separate planets at a previous time. (similar to the bubbles above, but separated more). I've toyed with ideas on what may or may not work and realized its a bit over my knowledge level.

My reason I am seeking help is to find out several things:

- Could the 2 partially merged planets sustain this state? (maybe they could be still orbiting each other while physically attached)
- Could pre-existing life survive even a minor collision of the 2 planets?
- How would gravity work at different points on the planet?
- What would you expect the planets rotation to be like?
- What would happen along the "rub" points as the 2 planets synchronised their rotations? (would there be a large valley or a volcanic ridge)

Strange question I know, but I think its a cool concept for a world and want to get as much out of it as possible in regards to scenarios and further ideas.

Any help is appreciated, even if only to tell me where to look or what book i should be reading.

Cheers,
Lonewolf
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
Could the 2 partially merged planets sustain this state? (maybe they could be still orbiting each other while physically attached)
its possible
- Could pre-existing life survive even a minor collision of the 2 planets?

unlikely http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impact_event

- How would gravity work at different points on the planet?

much like it does on earth...everything on th surface is attracted to the center of gravity (mass)

- What would you expect the planets rotation to be like?

it would have to be gentle enough so as to no separate any parts...gravity would have to hold the planets together...

- What would happen along the "rub" points as the 2 planets synchronised their rotations? (would there be a large valley or a volcanic ridge)

the planets would rub in a such as way as to minimize the gravitational potential energy...that is the centers of mass would tend to move as close together as possible but would be opposed from doing so by friction...
 
  • #3
There's no such thing as a "minor" collision.

Check out the double-planet Roche/Ewe that share an atmosphere, in Robert Forward's novels set there.
 
  • #4
you would need to make one a moon and have it slowly spiral inward till it reached the roche limit.
At that point I am not sure what would happen.
of course they would have to be tidally locked at all times
 
  • #5
I suppose the planets would have to be reasonably small (or just not too dense). Too big and the gravitational forces would pull them into a sphere.

Although still presumably big enough to retain an atmosphere if you're thinking of life there?

Gravity would be stronger where there is more ground underneath... so on the 'ends' of the double planet.

Due to conservation of angular momentum i would expect the object to be rotating fast...
 
  • #6
Thanks for your replies

You've given me some ideas and concepts to think about. The current concept I have is as follows:

- Planet A Is in orbit around its sun. Planet B is on the same orbit but slightly faster, shadowing planet A.
- They eventually have a cosmic collision and planet B becomes a Satellite of planet A
- Due to the masses/velocities of the 2 planets, Planet B's falling orbit, it eventually makes contact with planet A once more.
- Any liquid water on both planets would touch before any landmass does, this would cool the landmass's friction of each planet when they actually touch, preventing the mantle being breached, and also Planet B's falling orbit
- The Axis of rotation they are on in all likely hood would be different, causing a massive climate change to the worlds as they synchronised. But as both had pre-existing atmospheres before the second collision took place they would both be capable of supporting life, but maybe not the pre-existing life.

Possible phenomena
- As mentioned by Granpa Most of the liquid water on one planet would be following the other planet, likely leaving the only water source as a single ocean around the merge point. An Ice age on both planets prior to the 2nd contact might explain why water is still abundant. The water would still want to collect at that point, and would be lethally hot as friction disperses its heat into the water, causing it to evaporate, the lack of sunlight in the area causing it to cool quickly back to its water state.
- Just like with the water, the atmospheres would move to the merging point, this would leave the furthest point of each planet with relatively thin atmospheres
- The planet you would be on would have the dominant gravity, but with a strong influence from the other planet's pull, meaning there would be some sideways pull unless you were standing on the furthest point on either planet.

Is that close to believable? Any obvious flaws in logic?

Thanks again for your feedback,
Lonewolf
 
  • #7
A classic 3 body problem in space. There is no absolute solution, only approximations. Add more gravitating bodies and you get a bigger mess [but can still be approximated].
 
  • #8
Lonewolf27 said:
Is that close to believable? Any obvious flaws in logic?

The amount of energy released would melt both bodies to magma. There's just know way to have a "soft landing"!

After they are in common orbit and the orbit decays (why?), it will reach Roche's Limit where the tidal forces rip it apart. Think Saturn here. A large body would not stay intact all the way down.

In "low orbit" you are moving at some 17000 miles per hour. The planet's rotation will be much slower, so it will make quite a scrape when it lands, if that much were possible.

"Same orbit" and "slightly faster" are mutually exclusive. If they are in orbits that are very close together, they will interact over time and swap places, as is seen with at least one set of moons in our own solar system.
 
  • #9
You said it's a "fantasy world", so don't worry about making it hard science fiction. Just say a powerful wizard did it.
 
  • #10
The best you could probably do is to have the rotational speed of PlanetA match the orbital speed of PlanetB so there is no relative velocity between the two near surfaces. And of course, PlanetB would need to be tidally locked to A. I have no idea if this would be even semi-stable for any size of A and B. Obviously, your best story would be if A and B were about the same mass and 'almost' touching, say 25mi apart, so you could trap an atmosphere between the two and have very low gravity between them.
 

1. What is the concept of multiple gravity sources?

The concept of multiple gravity sources refers to situations where an object is being influenced by more than one source of gravity. This can occur in space, where multiple planets or stars may exert gravitational pull on an object, or on Earth where an object may be affected by both the Earth's gravity and the gravitational pull of nearby objects.

2. How does multiple gravity sources affect the motion of an object?

Multiple gravity sources can cause an object to experience complex and unpredictable motion. The object's trajectory and speed may be constantly changing as it is pulled in different directions by the various sources of gravity. This can make it difficult to accurately predict the object's movement.

3. How do scientists study and understand multiple gravity sources?

Scientists use mathematical models and simulations to study and understand the effects of multiple gravity sources. They also observe and analyze the behavior of objects in space or on Earth to gather data and make predictions about how multiple gravity sources may be influencing their motion.

4. Can multiple gravity sources be beneficial for space exploration?

Yes, multiple gravity sources can actually be beneficial for space exploration. Spacecraft can use the gravitational pull of multiple planets or moons to slingshot and gain speed without using as much fuel. This technique is known as gravity assist and has been used by many missions, including NASA's Voyager and Cassini spacecraft.

5. How does the concept of multiple gravity sources relate to Einstein's theory of general relativity?

Einstein's theory of general relativity takes into account the effects of multiple gravity sources on the curvature of space-time. It explains how the presence of massive objects can bend the fabric of space and time, causing objects to experience the force of gravity. This theory has been crucial in understanding and predicting the behavior of objects in the presence of multiple gravity sources.

Similar threads

  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
0
Views
699
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
2
Replies
37
Views
3K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
21
Views
970
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
14
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
9
Views
5K
Back
Top