Specific enthelpy at dryness fraction

In summary, the water in a kettle at 15°C was boiled and evaporated, using specific heats and steam tables. The kettle had an efficiency of more than 100%. However, when the water was boiled and evaporated using specific heats and steam tables using a higher value for Hfg (2676.0 kJ/kg), the efficiency increased to 121%.
  • #1
MonkSpeed
3
0

Homework Statement


Hi there,
I am trying to complete a thermodynamics assignment. I am doing fine until I get to the following question.

"Hx = Specific enthalpy at dryness fraction = hf + x . hfg" - I am not quite sure where Hf came from, I guess they want a value for Saturated liquid from the Enthalpy tables but which one?


Homework Equations



I have two Hf's I have already calculated.

Hf @ Ti 63 kJ/kg
Hf @ Tb 419.2 kJ/kg

These are just the values for saturated water at 15°C and 100°C.

Other relevant equations:

X = Dryness fraction = Mev / Mw = 0.013kg / 1.805kg = 0.007
Hfg at boiling temperature = 2256.4
Hev = Hx - Hf @ Ti
Qev = Mw * Hx

The Attempt at a Solution



I would just like to add that I have calculated all of the above, they were not given to me.

When I put the numbers I assume is supposed to be there I get.

Hx = Hf + x * Hfg = 419.2 - 0.007 * 2256.4 = 435
Hev = Hx - Hf @ Ti = 435 - 63 = 372
Qev = Mw * Hx = 1805grams * 435 = 785175J

Energy delivered by kettle
Qk = Pk * t = 2100watt * 310.4 = 651840J

Efficiency of my kettle
Nev = Qev / Qk = 785175 / 651840 = 1.20 or 120% lol

That can't be 120% so I have gone wrong somewhere and I think it is to do with "Hx = Specific enthalpy at dryness fraction = hf + x . hfg"

If anyone could shed some light that would be great.

Many Thanks.

Sorry for the long post.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Just to make sure i understand the experiment so that i can help -- So you had ~1.8kg of water in a kettle at 15°C which you evaporated fully? And you measured how long it took, along with the kettles power rating, to find the energy required which you then compare with the theoretical energy required? Is that the experiment you did?
 
  • #3
danago said:
Just to make sure i understand the experiment so that i can help -- So you had ~1.8kg of water in a kettle at 15°C which you evaporated fully? And you measured how long it took, along with the kettles power rating, to find the energy required which you then compare with the theoretical energy required? Is that the experiment you did?

Hi there,

You are nearly right. It's my fault for not explaining the situation properly.

I had 1.8kg of water which was at 15°C, I boiled that in a kettle and timed how long it took to boil and switch off (310.4s). Then I did some calculations using specific heats to work out my kettles efficiency. Then I did calculations using Steam Tables. I got 98.4% for the former and 98.6 for the latter methods respectively.

Then I had to do the calculations using steam tables and taking evaporation into account; of which there was 13g (1792g total after kettle had boiled) of water lost to evaporation.

This is where I am getting stuck and I have calculated 120% efficiency which must be wrong surely?

Many thanks.
:)
 
  • #4
So you had water at 15 degrees, it was heated to 100 degrees and then 13g was evaporated?

Have i interpreted that correctly? I did the calculation and got an efficiency of more than 100% which as you have noted is not possible.

I also noticed that you have used 2256.4 kJ/kg for the vapour enthalpy, however my textbook (Engineering and Chemical Thermodynamics, Koretsky) says that it should be 2676.0 kJ/kg which is significantly different. Did you maybe accidentally read the enthalpy of vaporisation instead of the vapour enthalpy (my textbook quotes the enthalpy of vaporisation as 2257.0 kJ/kg, so this is a possibility)?
 
  • #5
13g of water evaporated during the heating of the water to 100°C yes

You are right I have used enthalpy of vaporisation, is this not correct? Is this also known as Hfg?

For your information, I have just tried the calculations with 2676 kJ/kg and it has raised the efficiency from 120% to 121%

This really has me stumped. I keep going over everything and I'm starting to mix things up because I've been staring at it for too long.
 

1. What is specific enthalpy at dryness fraction?

Specific enthalpy at dryness fraction is a thermodynamic property that represents the amount of energy contained in a unit mass of a substance at a specific dryness fraction. It is a measure of the total internal energy of a substance, including both its internal energy and its pressure-volume energy.

2. How is specific enthalpy at dryness fraction calculated?

Specific enthalpy at dryness fraction can be calculated using the following formula: h = hf + x(hg - hf), where hf and hg are the specific enthalpies of the liquid and vapor phases, respectively, and x is the dryness fraction.

3. What is the significance of specific enthalpy at dryness fraction in thermodynamics?

Specific enthalpy at dryness fraction is important in thermodynamics because it is used to determine the energy required to change the state of a substance from a liquid to a vapor. It is also used in the analysis of steam power cycles and other industrial processes involving phase changes.

4. How does specific enthalpy at dryness fraction differ from specific enthalpy?

Specific enthalpy at dryness fraction takes into account the dryness fraction of a substance, which is the ratio of the mass of the vapor phase to the total mass of the substance. This makes it a more accurate measure of the energy contained in a substance compared to specific enthalpy, which only considers the internal energy.

5. Can specific enthalpy at dryness fraction be negative?

Yes, specific enthalpy at dryness fraction can be negative. This occurs when the dryness fraction is greater than 1, which means there is more vapor present than the total mass of the substance. In this case, the excess vapor has a negative specific enthalpy, resulting in a negative overall value for specific enthalpy at dryness fraction.

Similar threads

  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
15K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top